Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/119,785

SELF CENTERING LOW FRICTION EXTENDABLE CATHETER

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 09, 2023
Priority
Sep 14, 2020 — provisional 63/078,143 +1 more
Examiner
STIMPERT, PHILIP EARL
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Imperative Care Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 872 resolved
-7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+49.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
952
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 872 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-9 are objected to because of the following informalities: the claim recites “the inner catheter” in line 9 instead of – inner extension segment –. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by US Pre-Grant Publication 2020/0069917 to Laby et al. (Laby hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Laby teaches an extendable catheter (10) having a proximal end (14), a distal end (12) and a sidewall (20, 34) defining a central lumen and a longitudinal axis. Laby further teaches an inner extension segment (38) having a proximal end (62) and a distal end (64) and positioned extending (and therefore extendable) through the central lumen such that the distal end is configured to extend beyond the distal end of the outer catheter, and annular gap (see e.g. Fig. 4A), and a plurality of projections (36) partially positioned between the inner extension segment and the outer catheter, which are configured to center the extension segment. Regarding claims 2 and 3, Laby teaches that there may be 16 projections (paragraph 61). Regarding claim 4, Laby teaches that the projections are on an outside surface of the extension (see Fig. 3). Regarding claim 5, Laby teaches an axially movable control wire (guidewire, paragraph 52). Regarding claim 6, Laby teaches a pattern of projections (MxN array, paragraph 61). Regarding claim 7, as shown in Fig. 4B, Laby teaches that portions of the projections may be non-normal to the axis. Regarding claim 8, Laby teaches an extension segment (38), a primary catheter (10) with a distal end (12) and a central lumen (see Fig. 3), a control wire (guidewire, see paragraph 52), and centering projections (36) on an outside surface of the extension segment. Regarding claim 9, Laby teaches that the projections extend at least minimally axially and are ridges. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 31 March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to the argument that Laby does not teach an inner catheter or extension segment which is extendable through the central lumen, the examiner is not persuaded. The remainder of the clause, “such that the distal end of the extension segment is configured to extend beyond the distal end of the outer catheter” indicates that the limitation refers to, or at least includes (under a broadest reasonable interpretation of the claim), positioning rather than any extensional function. Since the inner extension segment (38) of Laby is positioned as claimed, the examiner holds that the limitation is anticipated. With respect to the projections, the examiner has clarified above that the extensions are partially positioned as claimed. Such partial positioning is not excluded by the claim and the examiner therefore holds that Laby anticipates claim 1. With respect to claim 8, the examiner notes that no separate argument is made to address this independent claim and therefore continues to hold that it is anticipated by Laby. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP E STIMPERT whose telephone number is (571)270-1890. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chelsea Stinson can be reached at 571-270-1744. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP E STIMPERT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783 4 June 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 09, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669117
ELECTRIC AIR COMPRESSOR SYSTEM AND POWER REGULATOR THEREFOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12633506
Heat Transfer Using Ionic Pumps
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631182
SCROLL COMPRESSION MECHANISM AND SCROLL COMPRESSOR
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12577961
LOW-FLOW FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM AND LOW-FLOW DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573932
LINEAR MOTOR AND LINEAR COMPRESSOR
4y 2m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.2%)
3y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 872 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month