Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/120,473

HANDLING OF CARDBOARD BLANKS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 13, 2023
Priority
Mar 23, 2022 — DE 102022106782.3
Examiner
KOTIS, JOSHUA G
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
MULTIVAC Sepp Haggenmüller SE & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 558 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+56.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 558 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment field 11/4/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-12 and 16-23 are pending. Applicant's election with traverse of Claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 5/9/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal was not found persuasive as outlined in the Non-Final Rejection mailed on 8/6/2025 as previously explained, there is an undue search burden as the method claims can be readily carried out by a distinctly different device which would readily require different search strategy and further burden. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 16-18 are thereby withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12, and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Vangeli (US Patent 5,871,431). Regarding Claim 1, Vangeli discloses a device (50; Figure 1) for handling cardboard blanks (10; Figure 1), comprising: an erecting device (shaping station 51; Figure 8) with a plurality of engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9; note additionally, the forming heads 70-72 can also be viewed as “engagement elements”); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to transition from a receiving configuration (Figure 9) to a forming configuration (Figure 9a); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move at least several of the engagement elements (70-72, 91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9) to transition from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a; Col 5, lines 38-59; Col 6, lines 34-64); wherein the erecting device in the receiving configuration is configured to receive a group of cardboard blanks (10; note that different sections of the blank can be readily viewed as different blanks but alternatively, the device is clearly capable of receiving multiple blanks) each having a bottom region (i.e. 11-13; Figure 1) and side regions connected (i.e. 9, 17-22) to the bottom region (11-13 as shown in Figure 1); wherein the engagement elements (70-72, 91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9) are configured to erect the side regions (i.e. 9, 17-22) of the cardboard blanks (10) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move the bottom regions (11-13) of the cardboard blanks (10) relative to each other upon transitioning from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown; Col 6, lines 53-64); and wherein erecting device (51) is configured to carry out the erecting of the side regions (9, 17-22) of the cardboard blanks (10) and the moving of the bottom regions (11-13) of the cardboard blanks (10) relative to each other at least partially overlapping in time (as shown in the movement from Figure 9 to Figure 9a; Col 5, lines 38-59; Col 6, lines 34-64). Regarding Claim 2, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to receive the group of cardboard blanks (10; see compartments A-C and note the device is clearly capable of performing such erecting on multiple blanks) in the receiving configuration (Figure 9) such that the cardboard blanks lie in a common plane (as shown by compartments A-C in the common plane). Regarding Claim 3, Vangeli discloses engagement elements of the plurality of engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9) lying on opposite sides (see 91d is clearly on opposite sides of 105 and 106) of a cardboard blank (10) of the group of cardboard blanks (10) are configured to perform a relative movement directed towards each other when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown). Regarding Claim 4, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to receive the group of cardboard blanks (10) such that four engagement elements (edges of sector 91a, 91d and 105 engage with compartment “A”) of the plurality of engagement elements are arranged around each cardboard blank (A, B, C; note that the device is clearly capable of engaging separate blanks in the manner in which it engages the different compartments), wherein two of the four engagement elements are opposite to each other in pairs (edges of sector 91a are opposite to one another in one direction to engage wall 9, while 91d and 105 are opposite to one another in another direction to engage 17, 18). Regarding Claim 5, Vangeli discloses at least one of the plurality of engagement elements (105, 106) is simultaneously engageable with two cardboard blanks (at 18/19 and 20/21) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (shown in Figure 9a, strips 105, 106 engage adjacent walls of different compartments and therefore are capable of engagement with different blanks in the manner as claimed). Regarding Claim 6, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to move the at least several of the engagement elements (91d, 105, 106; Figures 9,9a) at different speeds when transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (as shown in Figures 9-9a, the outer elements 91d, converge a much greater distance than in which the strips 105, 106 pivot). Regarding Claim 7, Vangeli discloses the plurality of engagement elements are arranged in a grid (note the elements 91a-91d, 105, 106 can be readily connected by lines that form a rectangular grid), and wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move engagement elements (91d) of the plurality of engagement elements located at positions further outward in the grid at a greater speed than engagement elements (105, 106) of the plurality of engagement elements located at positions further inward in the grid when transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (as shown in Figures 9-9a, the outer elements 91d, converge a much greater distance than in which the strips 105, 106 pivot). Regarding Claim 8, Vangeli discloses the movement of the at least several of the engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration comprises a movement in a common plane (a horizontal plane planar with plates 96, 97 of Figures 9-9a). Regarding Claim 9, Vangeli discloses the movement of the at least several of the engagement elements when the erecting device transitions from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a) comprises lifting the at least several of the engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106; note each element is lifted relative to the forming heads 70-72 and blank which are lowered). Regarding Claim 10, Vangeli discloses the engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106) each have at least one engagement surface (top surfaces thereof) for engagement with a cardboard blank (10), wherein the engagement surfaces are configured as guide surfaces for erecting the side regions (9, 17-22) of the cardboard blanks (10). Regarding Claim 11, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) comprises holding elements (sectors 91a-91c) configured to hold the bottom regions (11-13) of the cardboard blanks (10; Col 5, lines 40-59). Regarding Claim 12, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to move at least several of the holding elements (91a-91c) to transition from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown). Regarding Claim 19, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to simultaneously carry out the erecting of the side regions (17-22) of the cardboard blanks and the moving of the bottom regions (11-13) of the cardboard blanks relative to each other (clearly shown in movement from Figures 9 to 9a). Regarding Claim 20, Vangeli discloses a device (50; Figure 1) for handling cardboard blanks (10; Figure 1), comprising: an erecting device (shaping station 51; Figure 8) with a plurality of engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9; note additionally, the forming heads 70-72 can also be viewed as “engagement elements”); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to transition from a receiving configuration (Figure 9) to a forming configuration (Figure 9a); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move at least several of the engagement elements (70-72, 91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9) to transition from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a; Col 5, lines 38-59; Col 6, lines 34-64); wherein the erecting device in the receiving configuration is configured to receive a group of cardboard blanks (10; note that different sections of the blank can be readily viewed as different blanks but alternatively, the device is clearly capable of receiving multiple blanks) each having a bottom region (i.e. 11-13; Figure 1) and side regions connected (i.e. 9, 17-22) to the bottom region (11-13 as shown in Figure 1); wherein the engagement elements (70-72, 91a-91d, 105, 106; Figures 8-9) are configured to erect the side regions (i.e. 9, 17-22) of the cardboard blanks (10) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown); wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move the bottom regions (11-13) of the cardboard blanks (10) relative to each other upon transitioning from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a as shown; Col 6, lines 53-64); and wherein at least one of the plurality of engagement elements (105, 106) is simultaneously engageable with two cardboard blanks (10) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration (Figure 9) to the forming configuration (Figure 9a; shown in Figure 9a, strips 105, 106 engage adjacent walls of different compartments and therefore are capable of engagement with different blanks in the manner as claimed; Col 6, lines 42-49). Regarding Claim 21, Vangeli discloses the erecting device (51) is configured to move the at least several of the engagement elements (91d, 105, 106; Figures 9,9a) at different speeds when transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (as shown in Figures 9-9a, the outer elements 91d, converge a much greater distance than in which the strips 105, 106 pivot). Regarding Claim 22, Vangeli discloses the plurality of engagement elements are arranged in a grid (note the elements 91a-91d, 105, 106 can be readily connected by lines that form a rectangular grid), and wherein the erecting device (51) is configured to move engagement elements (91d) of the plurality of engagement elements located at positions further outward in the grid at a greater speed than engagement elements (105, 106) of the plurality of engagement elements located at positions further inward in the grid when transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration (as shown in Figures 9-9a, the outer elements 91d, converge a much greater distance than in which the strips 105, 106 pivot). Regarding Claim 23, Vangeli discloses the movement of the at least several of the engagement elements (91a-91d, 105, 106) when the erecting device (51) transitions from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration comprises a movement in a common plane (a horizontal plane planar with plates 96, 97 of Figures 9-9a). Examiner’s Note Examiner notes that if Applicant was to amend Claim 1 (and Claim 20 in similar manner) as follows such an amendment would appear to overcome the cited prior art. 1. (Proposed) A device for handling cardboard blanks, comprising: an erecting device comprising: a plurality of engagement elements; a plurality of holding elements, wherein the plurality of engagement elements are configured to be lifted relative to the plurality of holding elements; an engagement element drive arrangement configured to drive the plurality of engagement elements; and a control device for controlling the engagement element drive arrangement; wherein the erecting device is configured to transition from a receiving configuration to a forming configuration; wherein the erecting device is configured to move at least several of the engagement elements to transition from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration; wherein the erecting device in the receiving configuration is configured to receive a group of cardboard blanks each having a bottom region and side regions connected to the bottom region; wherein the engagement elements are configured to erect the side regions of the cardboard blanks when the erecting device transitions from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration; wherein the erecting device is configured to move the bottom regions of the cardboard blanks relative to each other upon transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration; wherein the erecting device is configured to carry out the erecting of the side regions of the cardboard blanks and the moving of the bottom regions of the cardboard blanks relative to each other at least partially overlapping in time[[.]]; and wherein the control device is configured to control the engagement element drive arrangement such that different engagement elements of the plurality of engagement elements move at different speeds when transitioning from the receiving configuration to the forming configuration. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See “Notice of References Cited”. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA G KOTIS whose telephone number is (571)270-0165. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 6am-430pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shelley Self can be reached at 571-272-4524. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA G KOTIS/Examiner, Art Unit 3731 7/6/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667948
FASTENER DRIVING APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654890
POUCH CONTAINMENT AND CARTON LOADING
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654304
Handheld Power Tool
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649602
METHOD AND MANUFACTURING DEVICE FOR STERILISING AN INTERIOR OF A PACKAGING, AND PACKAGING WITH STERILISED INTERIOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643700
A HORIZONTAL PACKAGING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.6%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 558 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month