Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/121,345

MESH CURRENT COLLECTOR FOR DRY ELECTRODE LAMINATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2023
Examiner
SRIPATHI, ANKITH REDDY
Art Unit
1728
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
74 granted / 111 resolved
+1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 111 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-5 & 9, 10, 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US20230420644). Regarding Claim 1, Kim discloses a method for manufacturing electrodes for a battery cell ([002]), comprising: Providing a first free-standing electrode (free-standing dry electrode film on one layer of current collector, [0015]); Providing a current collector including holes (current collector can be a foam, foil or porous body, [0040]); Providing a second free-standing electrode (free-standing dry electrode film can be coated on both sides of current collector, [0015]); and Laminating the current collector between the first free-standing electrode using at least one of heat and pressure and without using a solvent (apply heat and pressure to free-standing electrodes on current collector substrate, [0015]). Kim further discloses wherein the first free-standing electrode is a dry electrode formed without a solvent (free-standing dry electrode film comprising a dirty electrode, [0050-0051], dry electrode film is pre of solvent, created without using a solvent, [0053-0054]). Kim does not directly disclose wherein there is a second free-standing electrode. However, Kim discloses wherein the free-standing dry electrode film can be coated on both sides of current collector ([0015]). Therefore it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art using the disclosure of Kim to have wherein there is a second free-standing electrode. Regarding Claim 2, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the first free-standing electrode and the second free-standing electrode comprises an active material that exchanges lithium ions and binder selected from a group consisting of polytetrafluorethylene binder and thermoplastic polymer binder (active material can be material that exchanges lithium ions, [0057], binder can include PTFE and other thermoplastic polymer binders, [0017]). Regarding Claim 3, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the holes enable physical contact between the first free-standing electrode and the second free-standing electrode during the laminating such that the laminating results in electrode to current connector adhesions between the first free-standing electrode and the current collector and between the second free-standing electrode and the current collector in addition to electrode to electrode cohesion between the first free-standing electrode and the second free-standing electrode (current collector can be a foam or porous bodies, [0040], current collector is laminated to form the dry electrode, [0042], improved adhesion strength of the electrodes, [008]). Regarding Claim 4, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the current collector is made of a material consisting of aluminum, copper, carbon and or stainless steel ([0040]). Regarding Claim 5, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the current collector comprises a metal foam ([0040]). Regarding Claim 9 & 10, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the binder polymer comprises polytetrafluoroethylene and a thermoplastic polymer, wherein the thermoplastic polymer is polyvinylidene fluoride ([0017]). Regarding Claim 12, Kim discloses a method for manufacturing electrodes for a battery cell ([002]), comprising: Providing a first free-standing electrode formed with a power mixture including an active material that exchanges lithium ions and binder selected from a group consisting of polytetrafluorethylene binder and thermoplastic polymer binder (power mixture as defined in the instant specifications is a mixture of active material and binder material, free-standing dry electrode film on one layer of current collector, [0015], active material can be material that exchanges lithium ions, [0057], binder can include PTFE and other thermoplastic polymer binders, [0017]), wherein the power mixture is pressed and calendared to form the first free-standing electrode without a solvent ([0054]), Wherein the first free standing electrode is a dry electrode ([0050]); Providing a current collector including holes, wherein the current collector is a metal foam (current collector can be a foam, foil or porous body, [0040]); Laminating the current collector between the first free-standing electrode and second free-standing electrode using at least one of heat and pressure and without using a solvent (apply heat and pressure to free-standing electrodes on current collector substrate, [0015]). Regarding Claim 13, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the wires of the wire mesh are coated with a binder coating (see 112b rejection above for claim interpretation, binder polymer is in attachment enhancing layer which is coated onto the current collector, [0034]). Regarding Claim 14 & 15 Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the binder polymer comprises polytetrafluoroethylene and a thermoplastic polymer, wherein the thermoplastic polymer is polyvinylidene fluoride ([0017]). Regarding Claim 16, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the wires of the wire mesh are coated with a conductive coating (see 112b rejection above for claim interpretation, conductive material is in attachment layer which is coated onto the current collector, [0034]). Regarding Claim 17, Kim discloses a method for manufacturing electrodes for a battery cell ([002]), comprising: Providing a first free-standing electrode (free-standing dry electrode film on one layer of current collector, [0015]); Providing a second free-standing electrode (free-standing dry electrode film can be coated on both sides of current collector, [0015]); and Providing a current collector including holes, wherein the current collector is a metal foam (current collector can be a foam, foil or porous body, [0040]); Laminating the current collector between the first free-standing electrode and second free-standing electrode using at least one of heat and pressure and without using a solvent (apply heat and pressure to free-standing electrodes on current collector substrate, [0015]). Providing a first free-standing electrode formed with a power mixture including an active material that exchanges lithium ions and binder selected from a group consisting of polytetrafluorethylene binder and thermoplastic polymer binder (power mixture as defined in the instant specifications is a mixture of active material and binder material, free-standing dry electrode film on one layer of current collector, [0015], active material can be material that exchanges lithium ions, [0057], binder can include PTFE and other thermoplastic polymer binders, [0017]), wherein the power mixture is pressed and calendared to form the first free-standing electrode without a solvent ([0054]), Wherein the first free standing electrode is a dry electrode ([0050]); wherein the first free-standing electrode is selected from a group consisting of a dry electrode ([008]). Kim further discloses wherein the holes enable physical contact between the first free-standing electrode and the second free-standing electrode during the laminating such that the laminating results in electrode to current connector adhesions between the first free-standing electrode and the current collector and between the second free-standing electrode and the current collector in addition to electrode to electrode cohesion between the first free-standing electrode and the second free-standing electrode (current collector can be a foam or porous bodies, [0040], current collector is laminated to form the dry electrode, [0042], improved adhesion strength of the electrodes, [008]). Regarding Claim 18, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the wires of the wire mesh are coated with a binder coating (see 112b rejection above for claim interpretation, binder polymer is in attachment enhancing layer which is coated onto the current collector, [0034]). Regarding Claim 19 & 20, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim further discloses wherein the binder polymer comprises polytetrafluoroethylene and a thermoplastic polymer, wherein the thermoplastic polymer is polyvinylidene fluoride ([0017]). Claim(s) 6 & 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US20230420644) in view of Banno (US20060120021). Regarding Claim 6, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim does not directly disclose wherein the current collector comprises an expanded metal sheet. Banno discloses a current collector that can be formed of expanded metal sheets or foam ([0136]). Banno further discloses wherein the electrode attached to the current collector can contained PTFE and PVDF polymers ([0113]). Banno further discloses the electrode contains thermoplastic resins ([0114]). Banno further discloses wherein the current collector can be formed on the electrode through various methods ([0122]), including melting and extruding the film ([0124]). Banno further discloses wherein the current collector can be formed of stainless steel, or aluminum ([0136]). Banno teaches that this structure provides improved safety and stability of the battery cell ([0011]). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Kim with the teachings of Banno to have wherein the current collector comprises an expanded metal sheet. This modification would yield the expected result of improved safety and stability of the battery cell. Regarding Claim 7, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim does not directly disclose wherein the current collector comprises a perforated metal sheet. Banno discloses a current collector that can be formed of expanded metal sheets or foam ([0136]). Banno further discloses wherein the current collectors can be formed of perforated stampable sheets ([0123]). Banno further discloses wherein the electrode attached to the current collector can contained PTFE and PVDF polymers ([0113]). Banno further discloses the electrode contains thermoplastic resins ([0114]). Banno further discloses wherein the current collector can be formed on the electrode through various methods ([0122]), including melting and extruding the film ([0124]). Banno further discloses wherein the current collector can be formed of stainless steel, or aluminum ([0136]). Banno teaches that this structure provides improved safety and stability of the battery cell ([0011]). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Kim with the teachings of Banno to have wherein the current collector comprises a perforated metal sheet. This modification would yield the expected result of improved safety and stability of the battery cell. Claim(s) 8 & 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US20230420644) in view of Tiruvannamalai (US20220320504). Regarding Claim 8 & 11, Kim discloses the limitations as set forth above. Kim does not directly disclose wherein at least some wires of the wire mesh are coated with a binder coating. Tiruvannamalai discloses a lithium secondary battery that includes a mesh current collector ([0023]). Tiruvannamalai further discloses wherein the current collector has conductive-coating patches provided on the current collector web ([0026]). Tiruvannamalai further discloses wherein the conductive-coating patches are formed of binder material ([0028]). Tiruvannamalai teaches that this structure provides improved adhesion ([0028]). Therefore it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Kim with the teachings of Tiruvannamalai to have wherein the current collector comprises a wire mesh and at least some wires of the wire mesh are coated with a binder coating. This modification would yield the expected result of improved adhesion. Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments, see Claims, filed November 24th, 2025, with respect to Claim 8 & 11 35 USC 112(b) have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 35 USC 112(b) rejections of Claims 8 & 11 have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed November 24th, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Kim does not disclose wherein the free standing electrode are each a dry electrode formed without a solvent. Kim discloses that a dry electrode film is an electrode film free of a detectable processing solvent, a processing solvent residue or a processing solvent impurity. That is, as opposed to wet electrode films, the “dry” electrode film described herein refers to an electrode film formed by a dry manufacturing process without using a solvent ([0053]). Kim further discloses wherein the binder used in the dry electrode film is a dry binder not formed of solvent ([0015]). Furthermore, Kim discloses wherein the first free-standing electrode is a dry electrode formed without a solvent (free-standing dry electrode film comprising a dirty electrode, [0050-0051], dry electrode film is free of solvent, created without using a solvent, [0053-0054]). Therefore, Applicant arguments are not commensurate in scope with the claim language. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANKITH R SRIPATHI whose telephone number is (571)272-2370. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 7:30 am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Martin can be reached at 571-270-7871. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANKITH R SRIPATHI/Examiner, Art Unit 1728 /MATTHEW T MARTIN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1728
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12555780
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE AND SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12523705
Battery Apparatus and Current Sensor Diagnosis Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12519101
CERIA-CARBON-SULFUR COMPOSITE, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME, AND POSITIVE ELECTRODE AND LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERY COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12506139
Lithium-Doped Silicon-Based Oxide Negative Electrode Active Material, Method of Preparing the Same, and Negative Electrode and Secondary Battery Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12489161
SECONDARY BATTERY AND BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+26.2%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 111 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month