Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/124,688

PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE LEAFLET ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Examiner
GHERBI, SUZETTE JAIME J
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1160 granted / 1367 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1396
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1367 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-16 and 23-30) in the reply filed on 12/1/05 is acknowledged. Claims 17-22 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/1/05. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nguyen et al. (hereafter Nguyen) 2012/0259409. PNG media_image1.png 415 481 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1 and noting figures 3A and 3B supra Nguyen discloses a prosthetic heart valve comprising: an annular frame (12) comprising a plurality of interconnected struts, wherein the frame is radially compressible and expandable between a radially compressed state and a radially expanded state (see fig. 2) and a plurality of leaflets (22) situated within the frame, each leaflet comprising a main body (33), two opposing commissure tabs (34) arranged on opposite sides of the main body and two opposing sub-commissure tabs (36) arranged on opposite sides of the main body; wherein each commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet (see [0052] which states “…while lateral ends 30 and 31 are folded and joined to adjacent leaflets to form commissures..”, and [0055] which states “Adjoining leaflets 22 are then fastened together along adjacent seams 42…”) to form a commissure (24) that is coupled to the frame. Nguyen discloses that sub-commissure tabs of each pair of sub-commissure tabs are sutured to each other. However, Nguyen does not specify that “each sub-commissure tab is paired with an adjacent sub-commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet and connected thereto, wherein each pair of sub-commissure tabs extends radially inwardly relative to the frame.” It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the invention of Nguyen and join the sub-commissure tabs to adjacent leaflets and extend them radially inwardly to the frame in order to efficiently distribute and transmit forces along the leaflets and to the frame. Regarding claim 2, Nguyen does not specifically state that the sub-commissure tabs of each pair of sub-commissure tabs are sutured to each other. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the invention of Nguyen and suture the sub-commissure tabs to each other because Nguyen already utilizes sutures (see for example [0048]). Regarding claims 3-4, Nguyen discloses a cusp edge see markup supra that extends from one sub-commissure tab to the other sub-commissure tab and includes a reinforcing member (see fig. 4B e.g. 44) sutured to the cusp edge. It is obvious that the cusp edge portion is “coupled” to the frame as the illustrated in fig 5 around stitch area 44. Regarding claim 5, further comprising a second reinforcement member (e.g. 42) sutured to the cusp edge portions of the leaflets, wherein the first and second reinforcing members are positioned on opposite sides of the cusp edge portions of the leaflets (see [0058]). Regarding claim 6, the pairs of sub-commissure tabs are not directly connected to the frame rather to the support skirt (21). 11. Regarding claim 7, this claim is interpreted as a product by process recitation. See MPEP 2113. Products by Process claims are NOT limited to the manipulations of the recited steps only to the structure implied by the steps. Once a product appearing to be substantially the same or similar is found, a 35 USC 102/103 rejection may be made and the burden is shifted to applicant to show an unobvious difference. See MPEP 2113. A statement or argument by the attorney is not factual evidence. See MPEP 716.01. 10. Claim(s) 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nguyen et al. (hereafter Nguyen) 2012/0259409 in view of Salahieh et al. 2005/0137699 (hereafter Salahieh). 11. Nguyen has been disclosed however does not disclose “plurality of commissure support posts, and the commissures are mounted to the commissure support posts wherein the commissure support posts are components of actuators that are configured to produce radial expansion and compression of the frame. Salahieh teaches a heart valve frame (see figure 2B-2C) with actuator anchor commissure post (see e.g. 32/106). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the invention of Nguyen et al. and utilize a frame with actuator commissure post in order to improve radial strength of the implant and improve placement accuracy. 12. Claim(s) 23- 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Levi et al. 2012/0123529 (hereafter Levi). Regarding claim 23 and noting figures 21-24 Levi discloses PNG media_image2.png 297 441 media_image2.png Greyscale A prosthetic heart valve comprising: an annular frame (12) comprising a plurality of interconnected struts (see fig. 4), wherein the frame is radially compressible and expandable between a radially compressed state and a radially expanded state (see figures 17-18); and a plurality of leaflets situated within the frame, each leaflet comprising a main body, a cusp edge portion (see mark-up supra), two opposing commissure tabs (112) arranged on opposite sides of the main body, two sub-commissures edges forming notches (114) on opposite sides of the main body between the commissure tabs and upper end portions of the cusp edge portion, and two opposing sub-commissure tabs (116) arranged on opposite sides of the main body and extending laterally from the sub-commissures edges; wherein each sub-commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent sub-commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet and connected thereto (see fig. 24). However, Levi does not specify that each commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet to form a commissure that is coupled to the frame. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the invention of Levi and attached each commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet to form a commissure that is coupled to the frame because Levi envisions utilizing flexible connectors which could be utilized to form a continuous leaflet structure to be attached to the frame. 13. Regarding claims 24-25 see [0080] which states “the commissure tab assembly (comprised of a pair of lower tab portions 116 connected by connector 124) is inserted (here it is obvious that the tabs are capable of extending radially inward) through the commissure window 20 of a corresponding window frame portion 30. FIG. 32 is a side view of the frame 12 showing the commissure tab assembly extending outwardly (and in this instance it is obvious that the tabs can extend outwardly) through the window frame portion….”. 14. Regarding claim 26 see sutures 150 of figure 30 where the tabs are sutured together. Regarding claim 27 figure 30 illustrates suturing of the tabs. It is obvious that the sutures extend through the tabs thus not directly being attached to the frame. Allowable Subject Matter 15. Claims 8-14 and 28-30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 16. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closes prior art (regarding claims 1-16) is considered to be Nguyen et al. 2012/0259409 (see supra) which discloses a prosthetic heart valve with an annular frame comprising a plurality of interconnected struts, wherein the frame is radially compressible and expandable between a radially compressed state and a radially expanded state; and a plurality of leaflets situated within the frame, each leaflet comprising a main body, two opposing commissure tabs arranged on opposite sides of the main body and two opposing sub-commissure tabs arranged on opposite sides of the main body; wherein each commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet to form a commissure that is coupled to the frame; wherein each sub-commissure tab is paired with an adjacent sub-commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet and connected thereto, wherein each pair of sub-commissure tabs extends radially inwardly relative to the frame. The prior art fails to teach or disclose that the sub-commissure tabs comprise lower sub-commissure tabs and wherein each leaflet comprises two opposing upper sub-commissure tabs arranged on opposite sides of the main body, wherein each upper sub-commissure tab is paired with an adjacent upper sub-commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet and connected thereto. The closes prior art (regarding claims 23-30) is Levi et al. 2012/0123529. Levi discloses a prosthetic heart valve with an annular frame comprising a plurality of interconnected struts, wherein the frame is radially compressible and expandable between a radially compressed state and a radially expanded state; and a plurality of leaflets situated within the frame, each leaflet comprising a main body, a cusp edge portion, two opposing commissure tabs arranged on opposite sides of the main body, two sub-commissures edges forming notches on opposite sides of the main body between the commissure tabs and upper end portions of the cusp edge portion, and two opposing sub-commissure tabs arranged on opposite sides of the main body and extending laterally from the sub-commissures edges; wherein each commissure tab of a leaflet is paired with an adjacent commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet to form a commissure that is coupled to the frame; wherein each sub-commissure tab is paired with an adjacent sub-commissure tab of an adjacent leaflet and connected thereto. The prior art fails to teach or disclose that each sub-commissure tab is arranged between and spaced from an adjacent commissure tab and an adjacent upper end portion of the cusp edge portion on one side of the corresponding leaflet. Conclusion 17. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Suzette Gherbi whose telephone number is (571)272- 4751. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:00am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached on 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197. /SUZETTE J GHERBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774 February 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 17, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599470
SURGICAL-USE MEDICAL APPARATUS AND SYSTEM THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588996
CARDIAC VALVE REPAIR DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588987
LOW PROFILE TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582518
HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT PROSTHESIS WITH VARIABLE SEALING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582748
SELF-EXTENDABLE STENT FOR PULMONARY ARTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month