Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/124,776

SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF REQUESTING BUFFER STATUS FOR WIRELESS P2P TRAFFIC

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Priority
Apr 22, 2022 — provisional 63/333,822 +1 more
Examiner
ALAWDI, SHEHAB A
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
24 granted / 28 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -15% lift
Without
With
+-15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§102
85.7%
+45.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims [1-3, 6-10, 11-13 and 16-20] are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yi (US 20210112626 A1). In regards to claims 1 and 11 Yi teaches an access point comprising: [0118] Example 1 includes an apparatus for an access point (AP) in a Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) network one or more processors configured to: [0065] The processing circuitry 1006 may be coupled to the communications circuitry generate a first frame [0118] encode a first trigger frame, to be transmitted, via the RF interface, to a plurality of stations (STAs) associated with the AP, to query a buffer status of each of the plurality of STAs to trigger a receiver device to send a response frame [0037] After receiving the first trigger frame (e.g., the MU_BSRP trigger frame) 310, each of the plurality of STAs 120 may determine whether it have any data stored in a buffer and to be transmitted to another STA (which may be considered as a “target receiver STA”). If the STA 120 determines that it has data to be transmitted to a target receiver STA, the STA 120 may send a response frame 320 to the AP 110 based on uplink (UL) OFDMA that comprises buffer status data [0038] In an embodiment, the response frame 320 may be an A-Control Buffer Status Report Extension (BSR_Ext) frame corresponding to wireless traffic between the receiver device and another device; [0037] After receiving the first trigger frame (e.g., the MU_BSRP trigger frame) 310, each of the plurality of STAs 120 may determine whether it have any data stored in a buffer and to be transmitted to another STA (which may be considered as a “target receiver STA”). If the STA 120 determines that it has data to be transmitted to a target receiver STA, the STA 120 may send a response frame 320 and wirelessly transmit, via a transmitter, the generated first frame to one or more devices [0118] encode a first trigger frame, to be transmitted, via the RF interface, to a plurality of stations (STAs) associated with the AP, to query a buffer status of each of the plurality of STAs. In regards to claims 2 and 12 Yi teaches wherein the wireless traffic comprises peer-to-peer (p2p) traffic between the receiver device and the another device. [0027] In the Wi-Fi network 100, all the STAs 120 are associated with the AP 110. When two STAs want to communicate with each other, they may establish a virtual P2P connection. As shown in FIG. 1, three virtual P2P connections have been established in the Wi-Fi network 100, including a first virtual P2P connection 121 between STA1 and STA4. In regards to claims 3 and 13 Yi teaches set a frame type field of the first frame to a type indicating a buffer status trigger frame. [0051] The first trigger frame may be the MU_BSRP trigger frame. The plurality of STAs may include all STAs that are associated with the AP 110, in the Wi-Fi network 100. In regards to claims 6 and 16 Yi teaches the first frame includes a Common Info field carrying information that is relevant to a plurality of users or receiver devices, [0043] The MU_P2P trigger frame 500 may include a media access control (MAC) header 510, a common info filed 520, a TX User info field 530, a RX User info field 540, padding 550, and a Frame Check Sequence (FCS) 560, among others. The MAC header 510, common info filed 520, padding 550, and FCS 560 are the same as those in a basic trigger frame defined in the IEEE 802.11ax and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to set a subfield of the Common Info field to a value indicating a buffer status request for wireless traffic between the receiver device and the another device. [0035] The AP 110 may broadcast a first trigger frame 310 to query a buffer status of each of the plurality of STAs 120. In an embodiment, the first trigger frame 310 may be a Multiple User Buffer Status Report Polling (MU_BSRP) trigger frame as defined in IEEE 802.11ax. In regards to claims 7 and 17 Yi teaches the first frame includes a Common Info field, and in generating the first frame, [0043] The MU_P2P trigger frame 500 may include a media access control (MAC) header 510, a common info filed 520, a TX User info field 530, a RX User info field 540, padding 550, and a Frame Check Sequence (FCS) 560, among others. The MAC header 510, common info filed 520, padding 550, and FCS 560 are the same as those in a basic trigger frame defined in the IEEE 802.11ax the one or more processors are configured to set a subfield of the Common Info field to a value to trigger a plurality of users or receiver devices[0051] The first trigger frame may be the MU_BSRP trigger frame. The plurality of STAs may include all STAs that are associated with the AP 110, in the Wi-Fi network 100, to send respective response frames [0037] After receiving the first trigger frame (e.g., the MU_BSRP trigger frame) 310, each of the plurality of STAs 120 may determine whether it have any data stored in a buffer and to be transmitted to another STA (which may be considered as a “target receiver STA”). If the STA 120 determines that it has data to be transmitted to a target receiver STA, the STA 120 may send a response frame 320 to the AP 110 based on uplink (UL) OFDMA, that comprise respective buffer status data corresponding to peer-to- peer (p2p) traffic. [0038] In an embodiment, the response frame 320 may be an A-Control Buffer Status Report Extension (BSR_Ext) frame, which is an extension of the A-Control BSR frame defined in the IEEE 802.11ax. FIG. 4 shows an example A-Control BSR_Ext frame 400, according to embodiments of the disclosure. In regards to claims 8 and 18 Yi teaches wherein the first frame includes a frame type field, and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to: set the frame type field to a type indicating a buffer status trigger frame for peer- to-peer (p2p) traffic. [0035] The AP 110 may broadcast a first trigger frame 310 to query a buffer status of each of the plurality of STAs 120. In an embodiment, the first trigger frame 310 may be a Multiple User Buffer Status Report Polling (MU_BSRP) trigger frame as defined in IEEE 802.11ax. In regards to claims 9 and 19 Yi teaches wherein the first frame includes a Common Info field carrying information that is relevant to a plurality of users or receiver devices, and the frame type field is a subfield of the Common Info field. [0042] The AP 110 may send a second trigger frame 330 to the selected group of STAs (e.g., STA1, STA2 and STA5) and the target receiver STA (e.g., STA4, STA3 and STA6) for each of the group of STAs, i.e., the selected group of STA pairs (e.g., (STA1.fwdarw.STA4), (STA2.fwdarw.STA3) and (STA5.fwdarw.STA6)). For example, the second trigger frame 330 may be a Multiple User Peer-to-Peer (MU_P2P) trigger frame. FIG. 5 shows an example MU_P2P trigger frame 500, according to embodiments of the disclosure In regards to claims 10 and 20 Yi teaches set the frame type field to a type to trigger a plurality of users or receiver devices [0035] The AP 110 may broadcast a first trigger frame 310 to query a buffer status of each of the plurality of STAs 120. In an embodiment, the first trigger frame 310 may be a Multiple User Buffer Status Report Polling (MU_BSRP) trigger frame as defined in IEEE 802.11ax, to send respective response frames [0037] After receiving the first trigger frame (e.g., the MU_BSRP trigger frame) 310, each of the plurality of STAs 120 may determine whether it have any data stored in a buffer and to be transmitted to another STA (which may be considered as a “target receiver STA”). If the STA 120 determines that it has data to be transmitted to a target receiver STA, the STA 120 may send a response frame 320 to the AP 110 based on uplink (UL) OFDMA that comprise respective buffer status data corresponding to wireless peer-to-peer (p2p) traffic. [0038] In an embodiment, the response frame 320 may be an A-Control Buffer Status Report Extension (BSR_Ext) frame, which is an extension of the A-Control BSR frame defined in the IEEE 802.11ax. FIG. 4 shows an example A-Control BSR_Ext frame 400, according to embodiments of the disclosure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim [4-5 and 14-15] are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103 as being unpatentable over by Yi (US 20210112626 A1) in view of Kedar (US 20170332385 A1). In regards to claims 4 and 14 Yi does teach the limitation of the parent claims. Yi does not teach the first frame includes a first User Info field that relates to a first device, and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to set a subfield of the first User Info field to a first value indicating a buffer status request for wireless traffic between the first device and a second device. However, Kedar does teach the first frame includes a first User Info field that relates to a first device, [0119] as the trigger frame 902 of FIG. 9, is shown to include a frame control field 1001, a duration field 1002, a receiver address (RA) field 1003, a transmitter address (TA) field 1004, a Common Info field 1005, a number of Per User Info fields 1006(1)-1006(n), and a frame check sequence (FCS) field 1007 and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to set a subfield of the first User Info field to a first value [0123] a trigger-dependent Per User info subfield 1027. The User Identifier subfield 1021 indicates the association identification (AID) of the STA that is allocated the RU for transmitting UL MU data. The RU Allocation subfield 1022 indicates the RU to be used by the STA identified by User Identifier subfield 1021, indicating a buffer status request for wireless traffic between the first device and a second device [0120] a value of “3” stored in the Sub-type field 1001B may indicate that trigger frame 902 is a multi-user ready-to-send (MU-RTS) frame; and a value of “4” stored in the Sub-type field 1001B may indicate that trigger frame 902 is a Buffer Status Report Poll (BSRP) variant trigger frame. These example trigger type values and trigger type descriptions are summarized in Table 1. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Yi and Kedar before him or her, to modify the method of Yi to include the buffer subfield event as taught by Kedar. The motivation to do so would be to the improved wireless commutation performance. (0046 by Kedar). In regards to claims 5 and 15 Yi does teach the limitation of the parent claims. Yi does not teach the first frame includes a second User Info field relating to a third device, and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to: set a subfield of the second User Info field to a second value indicating a buffer status request for wireless traffic between the access point and the third device, to trigger the third device to send a response frame that comprises buffer status data corresponding to the wireless traffic between the access point and the third device. However, Kedar does teach the first frame includes a second User Info field relating to a third device [0119] a duration field 1002, a receiver address (RA) field 1003, a transmitter address (TA) field 1004, a Common Info field 1005, a number of Per User Info fields 1006(1)-1006(n), and a frame check sequence (FCS) field 1007 and in generating the first frame, the one or more processors are configured to: set a subfield of the second User Info field [0081] For example, the processor 330 may execute the frame formation and exchange software module 344 to facilitate the creation and exchange of any suitable frames (such as data frames, action frames, control frames, and management frames) between the AP 300 and other wireless devices. The processor 330 may execute the trigger frame control software module 345 to control the transmission of trigger frames to one or more STAs to a second value indicating a buffer status request for wireless traffic between the access point and the third device, [0120] a value of “3” stored in the Sub-type field 1001B may indicate that trigger frame 902 is a multi-user ready-to-send (MU-RTS) frame; and a value of “4” stored in the Sub-type field 1001B may indicate that trigger frame 902 is a Buffer Status Report Poll (BSRP) variant trigger frame. These example trigger type values and trigger type descriptions are summarized in Table 1, to trigger the third device to send a response frame [0110] As depicted in FIG. 9, the AP may transmit a BSR request 910 to one or more of the stations STA1-STAn. The BSR request 910 may request, trigger, solicit, instruct, or otherwise cause the stations STA1-STAn to transmit buffer status information to the AP. In addition to requesting buffer status information, the BSR request 910 also may indicate the granularity (based on the quantization value (QV)) of the amount of queued UL data to be reported by the stations STA1-STAn that comprises buffer status data corresponding to the wireless traffic between the access point and the third device. [0108] As described with respect to FIG. 6, the stations STA1-STAn associated with an AP may each transmit a BSR 601 indicating an amount and the priority level(s) of queued UL data. In response, the AP may select the size and location of RUs to be allocated to the stations STA1-STAn based on the received BSRs 601. For the example of FIG. 6, the stations STA1-STAn may transmit the BSRs 601 to the AP in the absence of a request from the AP. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having the teachings of Yi and Kedar before him or her, to modify the method of Yi to include the buffer subfield event as taught by Kedar. The motivation to do so would be to the improved wireless commutation performance. (0046 by Kedar). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEHAB A ALAWDI whose telephone number is (571)270-3203. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, [ Hamza, Faruk ] can be reached at [ (571) 272-7969 ]. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEHAB A ALAWDI/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /JAY P PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12621737
NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CONNECTION MANAGEMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12593324
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COORDINATING DATA TRANSMISSION IN A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
4y 4m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587307
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR DETERMINING PARAMETERS OF BURSTS FOR DATA FLOW TRANSMISSION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK BASED ON CHANNEL QUALITY
4y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581330
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE
5y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580680
INTERLEAVER DESIGN FOR NONCOHERENT REED MULLER CODES
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (-15.2%)
3y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month