Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/125,184

FOOT ACTIVATED ASSEMBLY FOR HANDS FREE WIRELESS CONTROL OF EXERCISE EQUIPMENT

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 23, 2023
Examiner
JIMENEZ, LOAN B
Art Unit
3784
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
5%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
8%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 5% of cases
5%
Career Allow Rate
6 granted / 112 resolved
-64.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
123
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 112 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 has been objected to as follows: On line 6, “the wireless” should be corrected to ---a wireless--- Claim 2 has been objected to as follows: On line 2, “communicating” should be corrected to ---communicates--- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tonal Tap Foot Pedal (https://www.etsy.com/listing/920482428/tonal-tap-foot-pedal-activator-for-tonal; archived October 19, 2021, accessed November 6, 2024; hereinafter: " Tonal Tap Foot Pedal"). Regarding claim 1: Tonal Tap Foot Pedal discloses a foot activated wireless control device (Foot pedal activator, See annotated Fig. below) for controlling an operation of exercise equipment ( “Attach your tonal bar control module to the Tonal tap and turn the Tonal Weights on and off with just the tap of your foot”, Page 2 Description section) comprises: a housing (Pedal Housing, see annotated Fig. below); the housing having a floor (Floor, see annotated Fig. below) with a first edge and a second edge (Floor has edges in both side, see annotated Fig. below), a first wall (First wall, see annotated Fig. below) extending from the first edge of the floor (First wall extends from the edge of the Floor, see annotated Fig. below) and a second wall (Second wall, see annotated Fig. below) extends from the second edge of the floor in parallel with the first wall (Second wall extends from the edge of the Floor and it’s parallel to First wall, see annotated Fig. below); the wireless control device (Tonal BCM, see annotated Fig. below) being disposed between the first wall and the second wall the wireless control device having an interior surface (the Tonal BCM has an interior surface that fits over the stabilization core of the device); the wireless control device having an external actuator switch (Actuator switch, see annotated Fig. below); and a stabilization core (Stabilization core, see annotated Fig. below) disposed between the first wall and the second wall (Stabilization is disposed between First wall and Second wall, see annotated Fig. below), the stabilization core receiving the wireless device (Tonal BCM, see annotated Fig. below) thereon, the stabilization core having a first portion (the top portion of the stabilization core that receives the Tonal BCM) having a shape configured to be received by, and mate with, the interior surface of the wireless device (see Fig. below that show the Tonal BCM placed on the stabilization core), and the stabilization core having a second portion having a shape preventing rotation of the wireless device about the stabilization core (The stabilization core has a taper on the back section shown best in the last annotated Fig. below that has been considered the second portion. Due to the shape of the Tonal BCM, the taper would not allow for the Tonal BCM to rotate around the stabilization core. Further, Tonal Tap Foot Pedal discloses “Our design ensures that the bar control module cannot slip out of place.” ); and a flipper (Flipper, Fig. 2) is rotatably mounted in the housing between the first wall and the second wall (Flipper is mounted between first wall and second wall, Fig. 2), the flipper rotating between a first position providing access to the wireless device (Flipper, Fig. 2) and at least a second position in which the flipper is in contact with the actuator switch to operate the wireless device upon the application of pressure to the flipper (Flipper shown in contact with the Tonal BCM, Fig. 3). PNG media_image1.png 647 536 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 624 541 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 579 738 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 416 495 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3: Tonal Tap Foot Pedal discloses wherein the flipper (Flipper, see annotated Fig. above) has a distal end (Distal, see annotated Fig. above) and a proximal end (Proximal, see annotated Fig. above), the flipper being in contact with the actuator at the proximal end (In contact with actuator switch, see annotated Fig. above), and further comprising an opening at the proximal end (Opening, see annotated Fig. above). Regarding claim 5: Tonal Tap Foot Pedal discloses wherein the interior surface of the wireless device is curved surface (see annotated Fig. below). PNG media_image5.png 467 541 media_image5.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tonal Tap Foot Pedal (https://www.etsy.com/listing/920482428/tonal-tap-foot-pedal-activator-for-tonal; archived October 19, 2021, accessed November 6, 2024; hereinafter: " Tonal Tap Foot Pedal") in view of Tonal BCM (https://knowledge.tonal.com/s/article/Smart-Accessories; archived September 9, 2022, accessed November 6, 2024; hereinafter: " Tonal BCM"). Tonal Tap Foot Pedal discloses the device as substantially claimed above. Regarding claim 2: Tonal Tap Foot Pedal fails to specifically discloses wherein the wireless device wirelessly communicating with a second device. Tonal BCM, discloses wherein the wireless device is a Bluetooth device that communicates with a secondary device (Bar Control Module (BCM) connects to Tonal Over Bluetooth, Page 1 Feature section). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Tonal Tap Foot Pedal to include the Bluetooth device of Tonal BCM, so that the user can have the functionality to turn the weight on/off with a press of a button (Tonal BCM, Page 1). The Examiner notes that Tonal Tap Foot Pedal does disclose a BCM, but fails to specifically state that the BCM wirelessly communicates with a secondary device. Response to Arguments The arguments have been considered and not found persuasive. With regards to the wireless control device not being rotatable around the stabilization core, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Tonal Tap Foot Pedal does disclose a second surface configured to keep the wireless control device from rotating around the stabilization core, please see the annotated Figure below. The NPL reference further discloses “Our design ensures that the bar control module cannot slip out of place.”. The wireless control device is not circular in shape, but instead on oval. Due to the nature of the shape of the wireless control device and the taper found on the stabilization core, the wireless device is prevented from rotation. With respect to the arguments addressing the “lock and key” configuration, this is a more narrow scope and has not yet been claimed. PNG media_image4.png 416 495 media_image4.png Greyscale Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LOAN B JIMENEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4966. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LOAN B. JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4966. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LOAN B. JIMENEZ Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 3784 /LOAN B JIMENEZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 23, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 12, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12544641
DYNAMIC EXERCISE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12465803
WEIGHTLIFTING RACK ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12453880
PHYSICAL TRAINING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 11577122
LIMBS COOPERATION EXERCISER AND CONTROL METHOD FOR THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 14, 2023
Patent 11541266
EXERCISE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 03, 2023
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
5%
Grant Probability
8%
With Interview (+3.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month