Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/125,851

SOLID-STATE BATTERY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 24, 2023
Examiner
YUSIF, HUNSUYADOR MUGEESATU
Art Unit
1743
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+35.0% vs TC avg
Strong +100% interview lift
Without
With
+100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
16
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Acknowledgment is made to applicant’s amendment of claims 1 and 2. Applicant’s amendments to the claims have overcome the 112(b) rejections previously set in the Non-final Office Action mailed 11/10/2025. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/10/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's argument that Sasakawa requires an insulating sheet between electrode groups, it is noted that claim 1 does not preclude an insulation sheet between the electrodes. Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In response to applicant’s argument that the prior art does not teach a series connection at inside the exterior film, Sasakawa discusses a series connection of the electrode groups 21 and 21 via a lead 23 (¶ 0056 and fig.). As shown in labeled fig. 2 below, this lead (23) is located within the perimeter of the exterior film which reason the series connection at inside the exterior film. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: On page 11, line 20, “…active material each other…” should read “…active materials to each other…” Appropriate correction is required. PNG media_image1.png 649 977 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akutsu (US 20210296739 A1) in view of Miki et al. (US 20160141613 A1), Sasakawa et al. (US 20180277904 A1) and Ryu et al. (US 20060159990 A1). With regards to claim 1, Akutsu teaches a solid-state battery cell (Abstract) comprising a stacked electrode body and an exterior film (104) configured to accommodate the stacked electrode body (Fig. 9). Akutsu teaches that the stacked electrode body comprises at least a first stacked electrode body (10) and a second stacked electrode body (20) that are formed by a stacked plurality of electrode plates (101, 102) that read on the single layer sheet electrodes (Fig. 9). Akutsu teaches that each single layer sheet electrode among the plurality of single layer sheet electrodes comprises a positive electrode (102), a negative electrode (101), and a solid electrolyte layer (103) disposed between the positive electrode and the negative electrode and comprising a solid electrolyte (Fig. 9). Akutsu goes on to teach the positive electrode comprising a positive electrode current collector layer stacked with a positive electrode active material layer comprising at least a solid electrolyte (¶ 0048). Akutsu also teaches the negative electrode comprising a negative electrode current collector layer stacked with a negative electrode active material layer comprising at least a solid electrolyte (¶ 0048 ). Akutsu teaches that in the first stacked electrode body (10), one outermost surface in the stacking direction of the plurality of the single layer sheet electrodes thereof and another outermost surface in the stacking direction of the plurality of the single layer sheet electrodes thereof are both formed by the negative electrode plates (Fig. 9). Akutsu teaches that in the second stacked electrode body, one outermost surface in the stacking direction of the plurality of the single layer sheet electrodes and another outermost surface in the stacking direction of the plurality of the single layer sheet electrodes are both formed by the positive electrode plates (Fig. 9). In Fig. 9, Akutsu shows that the negative electrode current collector layers of the plurality of single layer sheet electrodes forming the first stacked electrode body are bundled to form a first negative electrode bundled body at one end portion of the stacked electrode body in a width direction. Akutsu also teaches that the positive electrode current collector layers of the plurality of single layer sheet electrodes forming the second stacked electrode body are bundled to form a first positive electrode bundled body at other end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction (Fig. 9). Akutsu teaches that the first negative electrode bundled body of a negative electrode current collector layer of the first stacked electrode body and the first positive electrode bundled body of a positive electrode current collector layer of the second stacked electrode body may be connected in series at inside of the exterior film (fig. 9, ¶ 0006, 0083-0087). Akutsu teaches that the exterior film (104) can be a multilayer film material comprising a metal layer and an outer resin layer and may further include a polyamide such as nylon which is a resin (¶ 0054). The inclusion of this nylon reads on the inner resin layer of the claimed invention. While Akutsu teaches that the electrode plates include the current collectors (¶ 0048), Akutsu does not specifically teach that the negative and positive current collectors form the outermost surface of the first and second stacked electrode bodies respectively. In Fig. 9, Akutsu shows the electrode plates include an active material on both sides of the current collector. In a similar field of endeavor, Miki discloses a secondary battery comprising a power generating element comprising a positive electrode, an electrolyte layer, and a negative electrode that are adjacent to each other to form one single battery layer (¶ 0049 - ¶ 0050). In ¶ 0045, Miki teaches that the electrolyte may be a solid electrolyte. Miki also teaches a three-layer laminate film battery casing for covering the power generating element (¶ 0180). Miki teaches that this laminate film may be formed with propylene, aluminum and nylon. Miki goes on to teach that an active material is disposed only on a single surface of the outermost positive electrode current collector that forms the outermost layer of the power generating element (¶ 0050 and Fig. 1). However, Miki also discloses a current collector having an active material layer on both surfaces can be directly used as a current collector for the outermost layer (¶ 0050). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was effectively filed to directly use the current collector having an active material on both surfaces as taught by Akutsu as a current collector for the outermost layer of the electrode stacked body as there would be no unpredictable results as discussed by Miki. Akutsu in view of Miki does not teach an internal connecting portion configured to electrically connect the first negative electrode bundled body and the first positive electrode bundled body to the metal layer is provided at the one end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction to which the first negative electrode bundled body and the first positive electrode bundled body are connected in series. In the same field of endeavor, Sasakawa teaches a stacked battery comprising: a stacked electrode body, and an exterior film configured to accommodate the stacked electrode body (Fig 2, ¶ 0026 the electrode group stack reads on the stacked electrode body and the container member which houses the electrode group stack reads on the exterior film configured to accommodate the stacked electrode body). Sasakawa teaches the stacked electrode body at least has a first stacked electrode body stacked such that both stacked end outermost surfaces become a negative electrode current collector layer (Fig 2, 31c, ¶ 0031) one electrode group reads on at least a first stacked electrode body), and a second stacked electrode body stacked such that both stacked end outermost surfaces become a positive electrode current collector layer (Fig 2, 32c, ¶ 0040), one top electrode group reads on a second stacked electrode body). Sasakawa teaches a negative electrode bundled body of a negative electrode current collector layer of the first stacked electrode body and a positive electrode bundled body of a positive electrode current collector layer of the second stacked electrode body are connected in series (¶ 0056). Sasakawa also teaches the exterior film has an inner resin layer, a metal layer, and an outer resin layer (¶ 0064, Fig. 4 12a and 12b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to utilize a similar terminal at the cladding connecting the negative and positive bundled bodies in series in modified Akutsu as taught by Sasakawa as both relate to stacked battery configurations in which the negative and positive bundled bodies are connected in series within an outer multi-layer enclosure presenting a reasonable expectation of success, and doing so allows for an additional terminal presenting a simple application of a known technique to a similar device to improve the device in the same way. While Sasakawa teaches an internal electrode group connector to electrically connect the electrode groups in series (¶ 0027 and Figs. 1-3), Sasakawa does not teach an internal connecting portion configured to electrically connect the negative electrode bundled body and the positive electrode bundled body to the metal layer is provided at one end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction to which the negative electrode bundled body and the positive electrode bundled body are connected in series. In a similar field of endeavor of a solid-state battery, Ryu teaches that similar to Akutsu, Miki and Sasakawa there is a stacked electrode body, and an exterior film configured to accommodate the stacked electrode body (ABSTRACT, Fig. 3). Similar to Akutsu and Sasakawa, Ryu also teaches that the exterior film has an inner resin layer, a metal layer, and an outer resin layer (ABSTRACT, Fig. 3). Ryu teaches an internal connecting portion configured to electrically connect the negative electrode bundled body and the positive electrode bundled body to the metal layer is provided at one end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction to which the negative electrode bundled body and the positive electrode bundled body are connected in series (¶ 0015, Fig. 4, 7). Ryu recognized that a local short circuit that occurs in the positive and negative electrodes of a battery due to nail penetration, pressing, impact, exposure to high temperature, etc. can be resolved by attempting to disperse the short circuit current toward either the aluminum layer inside a battery package or a metal foil placed outside the battery package, thereby securing the safety of the battery. Ryu does not explicitly teach that the connection is in series, however, an electrical connection comprises a series connection and therefore reads on it. A labeled Fig. 4 is shown below: PNG media_image2.png 364 746 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to include the internal connecting portion Ryu teaches in modified Akutsu as both relate to a solid-state battery comprising a stacked electrode body, and a three-layer laminate (outer resin layer, metal layer, inner resin layer) exterior film configured to accommodate the stacked electrode body. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that applying Ryu’s improvement of the solid-state state battery to modified Akutsu’s solid-state battery would present a reasonable expectation of success as it yields a safer solid-state battery where short circuits are prevented via an internal connecting portion that allows for dispersion of the short circuit current toward either the aluminum layer inside a battery package. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akutsu (US 20210296739 A) in view of Miki et al. (US 20160141613 A1), Sasakawa et al. (US 20180277904 A1) and Ryu et al. (US 20060159990 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Tam et al. (US 20120299555 A1). With regards to claim 2, modified Akutsu teaches a second positive electrode bundled body of the positive electrode current collector layer of the first stacked electrode body and a second negative electrode bundled body of the negative electrode current collector layer of the second stacked electrode body are each bonded to tab leads at the other end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction (Fig. 9 of Akutsu). Although modified Akutsu teaches connecting a terminal to the metal layer of the exterior film, modified Akutsu does not teach that the exterior film has an exposed portion from which the metal layer is exposed and which is electrically connected to electrical equipment outside the solid-state battery at the other end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction. In a similar field of endeavor of a solid-state battery, Tam teaches that the positive electrode current collector layer of the first stacked electrode body and the negative electrode bundled body of the negative electrode current collector layer of the second stacked electrode body are each bonded to tab leads at other end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction (¶ 0006, the two power terminals read on the tab leads). Tam teaches the exterior film has an exposed portion from which the metal layer is exposed and which is electrically connected to electrical equipment outside the solid-state battery at the other end portion of the stacked electrode body in the width direction (¶ 0024 - ¶0025). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to include an exposed metal layer from the exterior film in Tam to electrically connect the battery to equipment outside the battery since both Akutsu in view of Sasakawa and Ryu as well as Tam relates to a solid-state battery with an exterior film including a metal layer and having electrodes bonded to tab leads. Akutsu and Sasakawa do not mention a specific method of connecting the battery to an external equipment however, it is known that the battery would be connected to an external equipment in some way. One with ordinary skill in the art would recognize that combining the connection method of Tam and Akutsu in view of Ryu and Sasakawa’s lead such as the metal foil which is charged due to connection with a terminal would have been predictably yielded a successful method of connecting the battery to an external equipment. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNSUYADOR YUSIF whose telephone number is (571)272-4531. The examiner can normally be reached 7 am - 5 pm (M-R). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Galen H Hauth can be reached at (571) 270-5516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNSUYADOR MUGEESATU YUSIF/Examiner, Art Unit 1743 /GALEN H HAUTH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1743
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+100.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month