Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/127,022

OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING APPARATUS, CAMERA MODULE, AND CAMERA-MOUNTED APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 28, 2023
Examiner
MERLIN, JESSICA M
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsumi Electric Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
714 granted / 1158 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1213
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1158 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (US 2020/0041811 A1). In regard to claim 1, Zhang et al. discloses an optical element driving apparatus 1a,b (denoted “first, second lens driving device”, see e.g. paragraph [0042]), comprising (see e.g. Figures 4-6): a fixing part 20 (denoted “OIS fixing part”, see e.g. paragraph [0043]); a movable part 10 (denoted “OIS moving part”) that allows an optical element 2a,b (denoted “first, second lens device”) to be held therein (see e.g. paragraphs [0042], [0047]); a plurality of support members 31+32 that supports the movable part 10 with respect to the fixing part 20 (see e.g. paragraph [0057]-[0058]); and a driving part 112 (denoted “AF coil part”) that moves the movable part 10 in a direction of an optical axis (see e.g. paragraph [0066]), wherein the plurality of support members 31+32 is formed of an elastic resin material (see e.g. paragraph [0048] for elastomer), each of the plurality of support members 31+32 including a movable-side connection part and a fixed-side connection part (see e.g. paragraphs [0057]-[0058] where element 32 is connect to fixing part 20 and element 31 is fixed to the movable part), the movable-side connection part being connected to the movable part 10 (see e.g. paragraphs [0057]-[0058] where element 32 is connect to fixing part 20 and element 31 is fixed to the movable part 10), the fixed-side connection part being connected to the fixing part 20 (see e.g. paragraphs [0057]-[0058] where element 32 is connect to fixing part 20 and element 31 is fixed to the movable part), and a plurality of the movable-side connection parts and a plurality of the fixed-side connection parts are alternately arranged in a circumferential direction around the optical axis (see e.g. Figure 6 and note that 31+32 are spaced at corners of the device). In regard to claim 2, Zhang et al. discloses the limitations as applied to claim 1 above, and wherein the plurality of support members 31+32 is arranged so as to be rotationally symmetric (see e.g. Figure 6 and note that 31+32 are spaced symmetrically at corners of the device). In regard to claim 3, Zhang et al. discloses the limitations as applied to claim 2 above, and wherein the plurality of support members 31+32 is arranged so as to be 90° rotationally symmetric (see e.g. Figure 6 and note that 31+32 are spaced symmetrically at corners of the device). In regard to claim 4, Zhang et al. discloses the limitations as applied to claim 1 above, and wherein: each of the plurality of support members 31+32 includes an arm part (see e.g. annotated Figure 6, attached below, where the arm is the portion that connects 31 and 32) that couples the movable-side connection part and the fixed-side connection part together (see e.g. annotated Figure 6, where the arm is the portion that connects 31 and 32), and the arm part has a two-axis hinge structure (see e.g. paragraphs [0053]-[0055] for hinge structure). In regard to claim 5, Zhang et al. discloses the limitations as applied to claim 5 above, and wherein the arm part (see e.g. annotated Figure 6, where the arm is the portion that connects 31 and 32) is separated from the movable part 10 and the fixing part 20 (see e.g. Figure 6 and note that the arm is considered to be the portion of 31+32 not in contact with elements 10 and 20). In regard to claim 6, Zhang et al. discloses a camera module, comprising (see e.g. Figure 6): the optical element driving apparatus according to claim 1 (see e.g. rejection of claim 1 above); a lens part 2 that is attached to the movable part 10 (see e.g. Figures 4-6); and an image-capturing part that captures a subject image formed by the lens part 2 (see e.g. paragraph [0042] and note that the image-capturing, denoted “imaging section” is not illustrated). In regard to claim 7, Zhang et al. discloses a camera-mounted apparatus that is an information device or a transport device, the camera-mounted apparatus comprising (see e.g. Figures 16a-16b and paragraph [0129] for camera-mounted apparatus, denoted “camera-equipped device): the camera module according to claim 6 (see e.g. rejection of claim 6); and a control part (not illustrated, denoted “control section”, see e.g. paragraph [0129]) that controls an operation of the camera module (see e.g. paragraph [0129]). PNG media_image1.png 776 666 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following reference is cited for disclosing related limitations of the applicant’s claimed and disclosed invention: Bai (US 2017/0254979 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA M MERLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-3207. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at (571) 272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA M MERLIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585057
A LIGHT DIFFUSER AND A METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572039
LIGHT MODULATION DEVICE AND PROJECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560794
MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATION METHOD AND MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560838
DISPLAY DEVICE AND VEHICLE-USE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554131
HEAD-UP DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1158 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month