Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/127,175

EDTA FOR TREATMENT OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS AND OTHER PULMONARY DISEASES AND DISORDERS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 28, 2023
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — provisional 63/324,332
Examiner
MAEWALL, SNIGDHA
Art Unit
1612
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
SterileCare, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
617 granted / 1050 resolved
-1.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
67.9%
+27.9% vs TC avg
§102
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1050 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action Restriction/Election Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 1-2 and 4-17 in the reply filed on 02/20/26 is acknowledged. Applicant’s election of species 1. A standard metered dose inhaler; 2. Polyvinyl alcohol; and 3. Cystic fibrosis, which is not caused by a microbe is also acknowledged. Claims 18-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/20/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 4-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Puvvadi et al. ("Role of Tris-CaEDTA as an adjuvant with nebulized tobramycin in cystic fibrosis patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections: A randomized controlled trial", Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2021, 20, 316-323, presented in IDS) in view of Wring et al. (US PG Pub. 2022/0339099A1). Puvvadi et al. teaches a double-blind randomized controlled trial using Tris-CaEDTA as an adjuvant with nebulised tobramycin in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. This pilot study demonstrated increased reduction of sputum density of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and increased ppFEV1 in patients treating with Tris-CaEDTA added to inhaled tobramycin compared to patients treated with inhaled tobramycin itself. The study utilized blinded 1.5 mL prefilled syringes, with the active drug containing 75 mg of CaEDTA in Tris-buffered solution (roughly 5 wt% CaEDTA). Administration was accomplished using a PARI LC SPRINT© nebulizer. (see supplemental box). Puvvadi et al. teach under study drug in section 2.4 that the study drug was supplied in blinded 1.5 ml prefilled syringes. The active drug contained CaEDTA 75 mg in Tris-buffered solution while the placebo consisted of Tris-buffered 0.9% saline. Active drug or placebo, when added to tobramycin (Tobra-Day ® 250 mg in 2.5 ml), resulted in a 4 ml solution at pH 7.1 to be inhaled using a PARI LC SPRINT ® nebulizer (an inhalation device). The dose and concentration of CaEDTA were based on safety and tolerability data obtained from previously published studies using inhaled CaEDTA, see section 2.4. Puvvadi et al. as discussed above does not teach use of Saline solution. Puvvadi et al. also does not teach use of EDTA microparticles or nanoparticles and polyvinyl alcohol polymer as claimed. Wring et al. discloses a pharmaceutical composition a peptide; a buffer; and optionally one or more additional components each selected from the group consisting of a stabilizer and a tonicity modifier, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is adapted for administration via inhalation. Kits and method of using same for treating an inflammatory disorder of lower airways in a human subject are also disclosed, see abstract. Wring et al. teaches that the delivery device for the drug can be a metered dose inhaler or a dry powder inhaler or nebulizers, see [0031]. The reference teaches that for formulations administered to lower airways, the composition can comprise a drug along with suitable carriers such as buffering agents, pH adjusting agents, tonicity adjusting agents, sodium chloride (saline solution) and viscosity adjusting agents as polyvinyl alcohols, see [0201]. The reference teaches use of EDTA microparticles, see table 8. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have utilized EDTA along with the known carriers used in the formulation comprising tonicity agent sodium chloride (reads on saline solution) and buffer for administration to the airways as taught by Wring et al. into the patients treated with inhaled tobramycin and calcium salt of EDTA of Puvvadi et al. One of ordinary skill would have been motivated to do so because Puvvadi et al. teaches treatment of cystic fibrosis by inhalation technique comprising CaEDTA and Wright et al. teaches that for formulations administered to lower airways, the composition can comprise a drug along with suitable carriers such as buffering agents, pH adjusting agents and tonicity adjusting agents sodium chloride (saline solution). Generally, it is prima facie obvious to select a known material for incorporation into a composition, based on its recognized suitability for its intended use. See MPEP 2144.07. Since Puvvadi et al. teaches that active drug or placebo, when added to tobramycin (Tobra-Day ® 250 mg in 2.5 ml), resulted in a 4 ml solution at pH 7.1 to be inhaled using a PARI LC SPRINT ® nebulizer, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to have manipulated the pH for inhalation by adjusting the amount of buffer and tonicity saline sodium chloride solution. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have utilized EDTA in the form of microparticles along with the known carriers used in the formulation as polyvinyl alcohol, tonicity agent sodium chloride and buffer for administration to the airways as taught by Wring et al. into the patients treated with inhaled tobramycin and EDTA of Puvvadi et al. One of ordinary skill would have been motivated to do so because Puvvadi et al. teaches treatment of cystic fibrosis by inhalation technique comprising EDTA and Wright et al. teaches that for formulations administered to lower airways, the composition can comprise a drug along with suitable carriers such as buffering agents, pH adjusting agents, tonicity adjusting agents, sodium chloride (saline solution) and viscosity adjusting agents as polyvinyl alcohols and wherein EDTA can be in particulate form. Generally, it is prima facie obvious to select a known material for incorporation into a composition, based on its recognized suitability for its intended use. See MPEP 2144.07. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SNIGDHA MAEWALL whose telephone number is (571)272-6197. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sahana S. Kaup can be reached on 571-272-6897. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SNIGDHA MAEWALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12616655
A TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC CONTAINING PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR BACTERIAL INFECTIONS AND WOUND HEALING
4y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12599625
TREATMENT OF ARDS AND OTHER CONDITIONS CAUSED BY ACUTELY ELEVATED CYTOKINE LEVELS AND POST ARDS CHRONIC CYTOKINE PRODUCTION USING INHALED ANESTHETICS
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599133
USE OF TRIFLUENFURONATE FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF AGRICULTURAL PEST INSECTS AND MITES
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599131
DISINFECTANT COMPOSITION
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595341
Process for continuous supercritical drying of aerogel particles
5y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+9.7%)
3y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1050 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month