Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/129,355

ELECTROSTATIC SPRAY DRIED ACTIVE COMPOUND POWDERS AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 31, 2023
Examiner
LAU, JASON
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Spraying Systems Co.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
470 granted / 880 resolved
-16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
941
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 880 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-21, 23-32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Sobel (US 20170312726 A1). Regarding claim 1, Sobel discloses a method of providing an active compound powder comprising electrostatic spray drying a formulation comprising at least one active compound (core material) (abstract), an encapsulating agent (carrier or wall material; abstract), and optionally an excipient at an inlet temperature of 150 °C or below and an exhaust temperature of 100 °C or below (abstract), wherein electrical charge is applied externally to droplets of active compound formulation feedstock liquid (para. 25). Regarding claim 2, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the atomizing temperature is about 100 C or below (para. 26). Regarding claim 3, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the applied voltage is about 0.1 kV or more (para. 23). Regarding claim 4, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the applied voltage is continuous (para. 55). Regarding claim 5, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the applied voltage is modulated between two or more different voltages (para. 55). Regarding claim 6, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the at least one active compound is an antioxidant, a vitamin, a bacterium, an omega oil, an essential oil, a flavoring agent, a pigment, a dye, or a combination thereof (para. 18). Regarding claim 7, Sobel discloses the method of claim 1, wherein when the active compound is an oil the optional excipient is an emulsifier, and when the active compound is other than an oil the optional excipient is an oil (para. 19). Regarding claim 8, Sobel discloses the method of claim 7, wherein the oil is plant or animal in origin (para. 18). Regarding claim 9, Sobel discloses the method of claim 8, wherein the at oil is vegetable oil, vegetable shortening, castor oil, rice brain oil, olive oil, canola oil, corn oil, palm oil, coconut oil, flaxseed oil, hempseed oil, rapeseed oil, linseed oil, grapeseed oil, rosehip seed oil, pomegranate seed oil, watermelon seed oil, seabuckthorn berry oil, camellia seed oil (tea oil), cranberry seed oil, hemp seed oil, borage seed oil, evening primrose oil, argan oil, jojoba oil, marula oil, carrot oil, sesame seed oil, sunflower oil, shea nut oil, soybean oil, peanut oil, walnut oil, almond oil, hazelnut oil, kukui nut oil, pecan oil, macadamia nut oil, meadowfoam oil, avocado oil, apricot kernel oil, an essential oil, silicone oil, fish oil, cocoa butter, shea butter, butter, ghee, medium chain triglycercides (MCT), or any combination thereof (para. 18). Regarding claim 10, Sobel discloses the method of any claim 1, wherein the encapsulating agent is a carbohydrate, a lipid, a protein, ascorbic acid, or a combination thereof (para. 17). Regarding claim 11, Sobel discloses the method of claim 13, wherein the carbohydrate is maltodextrin, sucrose, dextrose, glucose, lactose, trehalose, amylase, cyclodextrin, dextrin, galactomannan, pectin, starch, modified food starch, inulin, gum Arabic, guar gum, gellan gum, mesquite gum, xanthan gum, alginate, chitosan, shellac, carboxymethylcellulose, or a combination thereof (para. 17). Regarding claim 12, Sobel discloses the method of claim of 10, wherein the lipid is a fatty acid or an ester thereof, a fatty alcohol (e.g., decanol) or an ester thereof, a triglyceride (present in animal and vegetable oils), a phospholipid, a glycolipid, an aminolipid, a lipopeptide, partial acylglycerol, or a combination thereof (para. 18). Regarding claim 13, Sobel discloses the method of claim 10, wherein the protein is casein, caseinate, gelatin, casein, soy protein, wheat protein, whey protein, rice protein, pea protein, cocoa shell protein, or a combination thereof (para. 17). Regarding claim 14, Sobel discloses (see rejection of claim for citations unless otherwise noted) a method of providing an oil emulsion powder comprising electrostatic spray drying an emulsion comprising at least one oil (para. 18), an encapsulating agent, and optionally an emulsifier at an inlet temperature of 150 °C or below and an exhaust temperature of 100 °C or below, wherein electrical charge is applied externally to droplets of oil emulsion feedstock liquid. Regarding claim 15, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the atomizing temperature is about 100 C or below (see rejection of claim 2). Regarding claim 16, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the applied voltage is about 0.1 kV or more (see rejection of claim 3). Regarding claim 17, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the applied voltage is continuous (see rejection of claim 4). Regarding claim 18, Sobel discloses the method of claims 14, wherein the applied voltage is modulated between two or more different voltages (see rejection of claim 5). Regarding claim 19, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the oil emulsion powder has lower amount of surface free fat compared to a spray dried powder of the same oil emulsion (para. 27). Regarding claim 20, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the oil emulsion powder has an encapsulation efficiency of 50% or more (para. 42). Regarding claim 21, Sobel discloses the method of claim 20, wherein the oil load (total oil) ranges from 1-60% and the encapsulation efficiency ranges from 90-99% (para. 42). Regarding claim 23, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the at least one oil is plant or animal in origin (see rejection of claim 8). Regarding claim 24, Sobel discloses the method of claim 23, wherein the at least one oil is vegetable oil, vegetable shortening, castor oil, rice brain oil, olive oil, canola oil, corn oil, palm oil, coconut oil, flaxseed oil, hempseed oil, rapeseed oil, linseed oil, grapeseed oil, rosehip seed oil, pomegranate seed oil, watermelon seed oil, seabuckthorn berry oil, camellia seed oil (tea oil), cranberry seed oil, hemp seed oil, borage seed oil, evening primrose oil, argan oil, jojoba oil, marula oil, carrot oil, sesame seed oil, sunflower oil, shea nut oil, soybean oil, peanut oil, walnut oil, almond oil, hazelnut oil, kukui nut oil, pecan oil, macadamia nut oil, meadowfoam oil, avocado oil, apricot kernel oil, an essential oil, silicone oil, fish oil, cocoa butter, shea butter, butter, ghee, medium chain triglycercides (MCT), or any combination thereof (see rejection of claim 9). Regarding claim 25, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the encapsulating agent is a carbohydrate, a lipid, a protein, ascorbic acid, or a combination thereof (see rejection of claim 10). Regarding claim 26, Sobel discloses the method of claim 25, wherein the carbohydrate is maltodextrin, sucrose, dextrose, glucose, lactose, trehalose, amylase, cyclodextrin, dextrin, galactomannan, pectin, starch, modified food starch, inulin, gum Arabic, guar gum, gellan gum, mesquite gum, xanthan gum, alginate, chitosan, shellac, carboxymethylcellulose, or a combination thereof (see rejection of claim 11). Regarding claim 27, Sobel discloses the method of claim of 25, wherein the lipid is a fatty acid or an ester thereof, a fatty alcohol or an ester thereof, a triglyceride, a phospholipid, a glycolipid, an aminolipid, a lipopeptide, partial acylglycerol, or a combination thereof (see rejection of claim 12). Regarding claim 28, Sobel discloses the method of claims 25, wherein the protein is casein, caseinate, gelatin, casein, soy protein, wheat protein, whey protein, rice protein, pea protein, cocoa shell protein, or a combination thereof (see rejection of claim 13). Regarding claim 29, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the emulsion comprises an emulsifier (para. 19). Regarding claim 30, Sobel discloses the method of claim 29, wherein the emulsifier is at least one selected from casein, caseinate, lecithin, saponin, carrageenan, gum Arabic, xanthan, whey protein isolate, stearate, glyceryl monostearate, sucrose ester, monopropylene glycol, propylene glycol ester of fatty acid, polyglycerol esters of fatty acid, a mono- and diglycerol, mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, distilled monoglyceride, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, polysorbate 80, a sorbitan ester, a lactylated ester, an ethoxylated ester, a succinated ester, a fruit acid ester, carboxymethyl cellulose, and a combination thereof (para. 19). Regarding claim 31, Sobel discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the emulsion further comprises at least one active compound (para. 18). Regarding claim 32, Sobel discloses the method of claim 31, wherein the at least one active compound is an antioxidant, a vitamin, a bacterium, an omega oil, an essential oil, a flavoring agent, a pigment, a dye, or a combination thereof (para. 18). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sobel (US 20170312726 A1). Regarding claim 22, Sobel discloses the method of claim 20, except wherein the oil load ranges from 61-90% and the encapsulation efficiency ranges from 55-90%. However, the claimed ranges are a matter of optimization. Paragraph 37 provides the relationship between oil load (total oil) and encapsulation efficiency. The oil load determines the quantity of the active compound. The encapsulation efficiency affects the shelf life of the product (para. 27). Therefore, a person skilled in the art would have been motivated to arrive at the claimed ranges by considering the quantity of the active compound and the shelf life of the active compound. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON LAU whose telephone number is (571)270-7644. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 571-272-6460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON LAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601544
DRYING APPARATUS AND USE THEREOF AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN ISOCYANATE USING THE DRYING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601479
Process and Burner for the Thermal Disposal of Pollutants in Process Gases
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601543
DRYER FOR CERAMIC TILES OR SLABS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601496
ASSEMBLABLE FIRE PIT INSERT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595963
HEAT RECOVERY STEAM GENERATOR ACCESS DOOR ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 880 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month