Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/132,975

BROADBAND POWER SPLITTERS, DEVICES AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 11, 2023
Priority
Dec 31, 2017 — provisional 62/612,536 +2 more
Examiner
GLENN, KIMBERLY E
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
956 granted / 1065 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1097
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-6, 16 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jiao et al CN 105244591 A. Jiao et al discloses in figure 4, a power distributor of a radio frequency communication system comprising a first port D41 (i.e.an input port) : a second port D42 (i.e. a first output port) and a third port D43 (i.e. a second output port) ; a first signal path ( signal conductors L1a, L1b, L3b L3a) implemented between the first port and the second port, and a second signal path ( signal conductors L2a L2b L4b La1) implemented between the first port and the third port, each of the first and second signal paths including a variable capacitor (C31 C32) (i.e. a variable capacitance circuit ) ; and a resistor (R32) that couples the second and third ports. (per claim 1) With regards to claim 3, each of the first and second signal path includes a fixed capacitance circuit (C43 C44 C45 C46) and the respective variable capacitance circuit, the fixed capacitance circuit is configured to provide a fixed capacitance value. With regards to claim 4, each of the first and second signal paths further includes an inductance(L35 L36) that couples a node between the respective fixed capacitance circuit and the variable capacitance circuit to a ground. With regards to claim 5, the fixed capacitance value of the first signal path the same as the fixed capacitance value of the second path. Jiao et al states that the capacitance value of all DC blocking capacitors (C41, C42, C43, C44, C45, C46, C47, C48) is set to 1000pF, and the inductance of all inductors (L31, L32, L33, L34, L35, L36, L37, L38) are all set to 10nH With regards to claims 6 and 18 , a control circuit configured to provide control signal to the first and second paths to thereby provide a selected capacitance value for the variable capacitance circuit of the respective signal path. Jiao et al states “ Let one end of C31 be grounded, and the other end be connected to the DC bias voltage V3; Let one end of C32 be grounded, and the other end be connected to the DC bias voltage V4.” In this way, the capacitance values of C33, C34, C31, C32, C35, and C36 can be adjusted by adjusting the voltages of V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, and V6 respectively. PNG media_image1.png 667 559 media_image1.png Greyscale Jiao et al states “Construct the detailed parameters on the circuit board diagram in Figure 4 based on the above parameters. The high-frequency circuit board used in this embodiment is Rogers RO4350B, the dielectric constant of the board is 3.48, the loss tangent is 0.0037, and the board thickness is 0.76 mm.” Therefore, the power distributor is formed on circuit board (i.e. a packaging substrate) . (per claim 16) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arslan et al 6,108,517 in view of Jiao et al CN105244591A. Arslan et al discloses in figure 2, a radio communications system (wireless) 200 comprising a first radio transmitter 202 having a first transmit antenna 206, a second radio transmitter 204 having a second transmit antenna 208, and a radio receiver. The radio receiver includes a receive antenna 210, a radio frequency processor 211, and a baseband processor 218. The radio frequency processor 211 includes a power splitter 212, a first radio processor 214, and a second radio processor 216. An output of the first radio transmitter 202 is coupled to the first transmit antenna 206 and an output of the second radio transmitter 204 is coupled to the second transmit antenna 208. The receive antenna 210 is coupled to an input of the power splitter 212 and an output of the power splitter 212 is coupled to inputs of the first and second radio processors 214, 216. Outputs of the first and second radio processors 214, 216 are coupled to inputs of the baseband processor 218. With regards to claim 20, Arslan et al states that the present invention relates to digital communications and, in particular, to the demodulation of adjacent channel signals in digital communications systems. Therefore, the received signal are capable having frequencies within a cellular frequency band. Thus, Arslan et al is shown to teach all the limitation of the claim with the exception of a power splitter circuit including an input port for receiving the received signal from antenna, the power splitter circuit further including a first signal path implemented between the input port and a first output port and a second signal path implemented between the input port and a second output port, a variable capacitance circuit, the power splitter circuit further including a resistance that couples the first and second output ports. Jiao et al discloses in figure 4, a power distributor comprising a first port D41 (i.e.an input port) : a second port D42 (i.e. a first output port) and a third port D43 (i.e. a second output port) ; a first signal path ( signal conductors L1a, L1b, L3b L3a) implemented between the first port and the second port, and a second signal path ( signal conductors L2a L2b L4b La1) implemented between the first port and the third port, each of the first and second signal paths including a variable capacitor (C1 C2) (i.e. a variable capacitance circuit ) ; and a resistor (R3) that couples the second and third ports. One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to replace the general power splitter of Arslan et al with the power distributor as taught by Jiao et al . The motivation for this modification would have been to provide the advantageous benefit of a simple, symmetrical, compact and practical design, and a power distributor capable of realizing complex impedance transformation from source to load Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 7-15 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY E GLENN whose telephone number is (571)272-1761. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. November 14, 2025 /K.E.G/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
May 07, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 09, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 21, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640708
MULTI-FREQUENCY CAPACITANCE CANCELLATION IN AN ACOUSTIC FILTER CIRCUIT
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633634
NEGATIVE DIFFERENTIAL PHASE SHIFTER
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633893
FILTER AND MULTIPLEXER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626185
SIGNAL COMBINER
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620684
SPATIAL FILTER, DRIVING METHOD THEREOF AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month