Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/135,037

GROUND PLANE FITTING METHOD, VEHICLE-MOUNTED DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 14, 2023
Priority
Dec 19, 2022 — CN 202211634941.1
Examiner
PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA
Art Unit
2669
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
28 granted / 36 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
53
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/30/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendments Claims 2-4, 9-11, and 16-18 are cancelled in the application. Claims 1, 5-8, 12-15, and 19-20 are pending in the application. Response to Arguments/Remarks Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 (see Remarks, filed 04/30/2026) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Information Disclosure Statement No Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) was filed; therefore, no applicant-submitted references were considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5-6, 8, 12-13, 15, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by “Takiguchi” (Takiguchi et al., US 20100034426 A1). 1. Takiguchi teaches a ground plane fitting method using a vehicle-mounted device, the vehicle-mounted device comprises a radar device installable in a front windshield of a vehicle, the method comprising: acquiring, by the radar device, a plurality of point clouds of a scene front of the vehicle along a traveling direction and acquiring a target image captured by a camera (Takiguchi, ¶[0070]; the camera 230, and the laser radar 240 (examples of a measurement sensor, respectively) are mounted on a top board 103 (base) (refer to FIG. 4) of a measuring carriage 102 (a vehicle, hereinafter). ; determining a set of ground point clouds corresponding to the target image according to the plurality of point clouds and the target image (Takiguchi, ¶[0032]; an image displaying unit for displaying and superimposing an image in which a feature is captured by a camera and a point cloud, which corresponds to the image and of which a three-dimensional position is known); obtaining a plurality of ground normal vectors (¶[0057]; road surface shape model which is a three-dimensional point cloud model generated based on distance and orientation data; orientation data is interpreted as including ground normal vector because: ¶[0260] labeling unit 331 classifies the LRF data into the first group of the point cloud showing the part continuous to the street … using the fact that the laser measured point located directly below the vehicle is always the street … which the orientation is 90 degrees corresponding to the direction of running of the vehicle.), comprising: acquiring a plurality of images comprising the target image that are taken by the camera, each image of the plurality of images corresponding to a timestamp (Takiguchi, ¶[0105]; the camera 230 captures images during the running and obtains time series image data and time of image data showing an image-capturing time of each image); determining a camera coordinate system corresponding to each image (“Camera position and posture data” is interpreted as camera coordinate system: Takiguchi, ¶[0081]; The camera position and posture computing unit 130 calculates the position and the posture of the camera 230 (camera position and posture) based on the vehicle position and posture and a camera attachment offset.) , and obtaining a camera normal vector for each image based on the camera coordinate system (¶[0081]; The camera attachment offset shows quantity of displacement formed by an axis of attachment of the camera 230 against a vehicle axis (orthogonal coordinate). The camera attachment offset is a value corresponding to the relation between the camera 230 and the top board 103 in FIG. 4.; the axis of attachment of the camera against the vehicle axis (orthogonal coordinate) is interpreted as a camera normal), wherein each camera normal vector is associated with the timestamp of the corresponding image (Takiguchi , ¶[0124]; the camera LOS computing unit 140 calculates a LOS vector from the center of the camera to the measurement image point in the ENU coordinate system based on the vehicle position and posture data, the image data, the time of image data, the specified image number, the camera position and posture data (camera position and posture data is based on camera attachment offset which is interpreted as the camera normal), and the measurement image point.); acquiring movement data of the camera (Takiguchi teaches a motion stereo unit 310 and that is used for determining a stationary body, looking at a part of an image, that is captured in a plurality of images (¶[0135]), and for determining the road surface (¶[0163]) . Takiguchi further states ¶[0165] Motion stereo method using a plurality of time series of images captured by the single camera 230 is an operating principle based on the assumption that the movement of the camera 230 is known and the image-capturing target remain stationary); and obtaining the plurality of ground normal vectors by correcting the plurality of camera normal vectors according to the movement data (Takiguchi, ¶[0281]; When the three-dimensional coordinates of the laser measured point obtained from the LRF data is (x0, y0, z0), the laser measured point cloud of the LRF data is converted into the three-dimensional coordinates (x2, y2, z2) for the position of the vehicle with the following equations 1 and 2. Further, FIGS. 4 and 5 show positional relation between the top board 103 mounted on the vehicle, the LRF (the laser radar 240), and the camera 230.); and obtaining a fitted ground plane of a ground of the scene along the traveling direction of the vehicle by fitting the set of ground point clouds and the plurality of ground normal vectors (Takiguchi ¶[0279]; By the three-dimensional Affine transformation, the road surface shape model generating unit 150 generates the road surface shape model representing with the ENU coordinates the laser measured point cloud corresponding to the image in which the measurement image point is specified.). 5. Takiguchi teaches the ground plane fitting method according to claim 1. Takiguchi further teaches further comprising: setting a coordinate axis pointing to a sky of a camera coordinate system of the camera as the camera normal vector (Takiguchi, See Fig. 5 exhibits camera 230 and y-axis pointing to the sky; PNG media_image1.png 445 578 media_image1.png Greyscale ). 6. Takiguchi teaches the ground plane fitting method according to claim 5. Takiguchi further teaches wherein the acquiring a plurality of images comprising the target image and determining the camera coordinate system corresponding to each image further comprises: associating each camera normal vector with the timestamp of the corresponding image (Takiguchi , ¶[0124]; the camera LOS computing unit 140 calculates a LOS vector from the center of the camera to the measurement image point in the ENU coordinate system based on the vehicle position and posture data, the image data, the time of image data, the specified image number, the camera position and posture data, and the measurement image point.). Claim 8 and claim 15 are similarly analyzed as analogous claim 1. Claim 12 and claim 19 are similarly analyzed as analogous claim 5. Claim 13 and claim 20 are similarly analyzed as analogous claim 6. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takiguchi in view of “Du” (Du et al., US 20230215026 A1), previously cited by examiner but not relied upon. 7. Takiguchi teaches the ground plane fitting method according to claim 1. Takiguchi further teaches wherein obtaining the plurality of ground normal vectors by correcting the plurality of camera normal vectors according to the movement data comprises: obtaining a gravitational acceleration from the movement data (Takiguchi ¶[0108] GPS/IMU data (the distance data, the angle velocity data, and the positioning data) obtained by each measuring sensor of the vehicle, the image data, the time of image data, and the LRF data (orientation/distance data);. Interpretation: Takiguchi teaches that the IMU data (i.e., movement data) includes velocity data and time stamped data from which gravitational acceleration may be obtained); and correcting each camera normal vector to a corresponding ground normal vector by correcting a rotation matrix of a camera pose of the camera according to a direction of the gravitational acceleration (interpretation of “a direction of the gravitational acceleration” is according to Specification ¶[0048]; the direction of the gravitational acceleration is the same as a direction pointing to a center of the earth) (Takiguchi teaches correcting the laser range finder data using the vehicle position and radar data: ¶[0263]; the three-dimensional Affine transformation of the LRF data based on the position and posture of the vehicle and the position and posture of the laser radar 240 (i.e., including ground normal)). Takiguchi does not explicitly disclose correcting each camera normal vector to a corresponding ground normal vector by correcting a rotation matrix of a camera pose of the camera according to a direction of the gravitational acceleration. However, Du, a similar field of endeavor of monitoring an environment proximal to a vehicle during operation and determining ground planes, teaches correcting each camera normal vector to a corresponding ground normal vector by correcting a rotation matrix of a camera pose of the camera according to a direction of the gravitational acceleration (Du, ¶[0081]; a left camera ground plane normal vector Norm.sub.L is determined based upon the rotation transformation matrix Rim and the front camera normal matrix). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include correcting camera normal with ground plane normal as taught by Du to the invention of Takiguchi. The motivation to do so would be to determine alignment to improve uneven ground, lane and environment sensing. Claim 14 is similarly analyzed as analogous claim 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANDHANA PEDAPATI whose telephone number is (571)272-5325. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-6pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chan Park can be reached at 5712727409. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHANDHANA PEDAPATI/Examiner, Art Unit 2669 /CHAN S PARK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705711
PROGRAM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694676
METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR GENERATING SPORTS GAME HIGHLIGHT VIDEO BASED ON EXCITEMENT OF GAMEPLAY
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688598
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OBJECT DETECTION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682505
SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD, SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE, AND IMAGING SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12654312
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSISTING IN OBJECT RECOGNITION IN OBJECT PROCESSING SYSTEMS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month