Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/135,146

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 15, 2023
Priority
Apr 18, 2022 — provisional 63/332,165 +20 more
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1044 granted / 1232 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1295
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1232 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office acknowledges the receipt of the response to the restriction requirement dated 08/07/2026. Elected Species PNG media_image1.png 232 650 media_image1.png Greyscale A search of the prior art did not show the elected species. As no claims were specifically drawn to applicants’ elected species in independent form, no claims have been indicated as allowable. Claims written in independent form which require all the limitations of the elected species along with any dependent claims which require all the limitations of the elected species would be allowable. Under MPEP 803.02, the search was expanded to find an examinable species. Examinable Species PNG media_image2.png 264 410 media_image2.png Greyscale Metal Complex 1496 reads on claims 1-11, 17-20. Claims 12-16 are withdrawn from further prior art consideration as not reading on the examinable species. Claim 13 was rejected due to 112 2nd issues in an effort shorten prosecution. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cai (US 2023/0058719 A1) Regarding Claims 1-11, Cai teaches a Metal complex 1499 (MC1496) (page 23): PNG media_image2.png 264 410 media_image2.png Greyscale MC1496 reads on applicants’ Formula 1 wherein m =1; X1-X4 = C; B = pyridine; R5 = t-Bu and F; R4 = CD3; Z1 = C; Z2 = N; Z3= N; R3 = H; R2 = H; Y = O; R1 = D = CN (per claims 1-8). MC1496 reads on PNG media_image3.png 190 122 media_image3.png Greyscale , PNG media_image4.png 172 104 media_image4.png Greyscale X2-X4 = C; R3a = H; R2a = H; R1a = D and CN (per claims 10 and 11). Regarding Claims 17-20, Cai teaches an OLED (paragraph 36): Device 100 may include a substrate 101, an anode 110, a hole injection layer 120, a hole transport layer 130, an electron blocking layer 140, an emissive layer 150, a hole blocking layer 160, an electron transport layer 170, an electron injection layer 180 and a cathode 190. MC1496 is in the emissive layer (paragraph 216) (per claim 17). The first host compound and the second host compound in the electroluminescent device comprises at least one chemical group selected from the group consisting of: benzene, pyridine, pyrimidine, triazine, carbazole, azacarbazole, indolocarbazole, dibenzothiophene, azadibenzothiophene, dibenzofuran, azadibenzofuran, dibenzoselenophene, triphenylene, azatriphenylene, fluorene, silafluorene, naphthalene, quinoline, isoquinoline, quinazoline, quinoxaline, phenanthrene, azaphenanthrene, and combinations thereof (paragraph 221) (per claim 18). A specific host is represented by PNG media_image5.png 214 406 media_image5.png Greyscale (page 24)(per claim 19). The OLED can be used in consumer products include flat panel displays, monitors, medical monitors, televisions, billboards, lights for interior or exterior illumination and/or signaling, heads-up displays, fully or partially transparent displays, flexible displays, smart phones (paragraph 41) (per claim 20). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 15 depends from claim 1 and recites LA is selected from the group consisting of the structures of LIST A1, LIST A2, and LIST A3 as defined herein; and LB is selected from the group consisting of the structures of LIST B1 and LIST B2 as defined herein. However, there is no LIST A1, LIST A2, and LIST A3; LIST B1 and LIST B2 listed in claim 1. The claim is rendered indefinite. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772655
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760040
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757568
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE, LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753191
ORGANIC COMPOUND, MIXTURE, COMPOSITION, AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757570
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.1%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1232 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month