Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/135,701

LIGHT DIFFUSING LENS AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 17, 2023
Priority
Jul 17, 2013 — RE 10-2013-0084327 +6 more
Examiner
MAI, THIEN T
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
408 granted / 690 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
730
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
86.0%
+46.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 690 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/16/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 17-21, 23-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20140293582) in view of Chang (US 20150009680 ) Lee discloses A light module comprising: a substrate (500) for electrical connection; light sources (200-204) disposed on the substrate and comprising a first light emitter and a second light emitter; and a plurality of lenses (101-104) disposed on the substrate, each lens comprising a light exit region, each of the plurality of lenses includes an upper surface and a lower surface and an outer side surface between the upper surface and the lower surface of the lens (Fig. 7-9), wherein the lower surface of each lens includes a light incident region depressed inwards therefrom (Fig. 3-5) at an optical axis defined by a straight line passing through a center of the lens, wherein the upper surface of each lens includes a curved shape depressed toward the optical axis and the light incident region of the lens (Fig. 5), wherein the outer side surface of each lens comprises a first region 120 and a second region 150 bulging further outward from the optical axis than the first region, wherein a light emitted through one of the lenses corresponding to the first light emitter has a different shape of beam angle distribution than a shape of a beam angle distribution of a light emitted through another one of the lenses corresponding to the second light emitter (par. 49-50, 68), the first light emitter and the second light emitter are disposed on the same substrate (Fig. 7, 9), wherein the optical axis of each of the plurality of lenses is oriented perpendicular with respect to the substrate (Fig. 7, 9), and wherein the first region (120) is a planar surface extending from a distal end of the upper surface (Figs. 7-9), and Lee is silent to the second region 150 is a convex surface extending from an end of the planar surface 120 to a position above a top surface of the substrate. Chang discloses a second region 120 is a convex surface extending from an end of the planar surface 130 to a position above a top surface of the substrate (Chang, Fig. 1-3) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Chang to achieve a light distribution pattern or mounting structure characterized by the structure in Chang. Claim 18.17, wherein a distance from an outer boundary of the first region to the optical axis is not constant (Fig. 5-9). Claim 19.17, wherein a distance from an outer boundary of the second region to the optical axis is not constant (Fig. 5-9). Claim 20.18, wherein the distance from the outer boundary of the first region to the optical axis increases as the first region extends toward the lower surface (Figs. 5-9). Claim 21.18, wherein the outer boundary of the first region comprises a flat face (Fig. 7-9). Claim 24.21, wherein the light incident region includes a first convex face and a second convex face (Fig. 3-5, 6c-f). Claim 25.24, wherein the first and second convex faces have different radiuses of curvature (Fig. 3-5, 6c-f). Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20140293582)/ Chang (US 20150009680 ) in view of Pao (US 20070273984) Re claim 22.21, wherein an angle defined between the flat face of the first region and the lower surface is less than about 90* Pao discloses an angle defined between the flat face 320 of the first region and the lower surface is less than about 90* (Fig. 5) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Pao to achieve a light distribution pattern characterized by the flat face angle. Claim(s) 23, 27-31, 33-34, 36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20140293582)/ Chang (US 20150009680) in view of Kasai (US 20120099046) 23.17, further comprising a reflective sheet disposed on the substrate and reflecting a light emitted from each lens (Lee discloses a reflective sheet, par. 54; Lee is silent to the substrate arranged on the lower surface of the reflective sheet; Kasai discloses a reflective sheet (42, 11) disposed on substrate 41 for reflecting a light emitted from the lenses; it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Kasai for ease of manufacturing by being able to be attached to the substrate and for reflecting more light upward) 27. A display apparatus comprising: a substrate 500 for electrical connection; a light source 200 disposed on the substrate and comprising a first light emitter and a second light emitter (Figs. 7-9); a plurality of lenses disposed on the substrate, each lens comprising a light exit region, each of the plurality of lenses includes an upper surface and a lower surface and an outer side surface between the upper surface and the lower surface of the lens (Lee, Figs. 3-9); and a reflective sheet reflecting a light emitted from the lenses, wherein the lower surface includes a light incident portion depressed inwards therefrom at an optical axis defined by a straight line passing through a center of the lens, wherein the upper surface includes a curved shape depressed toward the optical axis and the light incident portion of the lens, wherein the outer side surface comprises a first region and a second region bulging further outward from the optical axis than the first region, wherein the substrate is arranged on a lower surface of the reflective sheet (Lee discloses a reflective sheet; Lee is silent to the substrate arranged on the lower surface of the reflective sheet; Kasai discloses a reflective sheet (42, 11) disposed on substrate 41 for reflecting a light emitted from the lenses; it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Kasai for ease of manufacturing by being able to be attached to the substrate and for reflecting more light upward), wherein a light emitted through one of the lenses has a different shape of beam angle distribution than a shape of a beam angle distribution of a light emitted though at least one of the other lenses and wherein the optical axis of each of the plurality of lenses is oriented perpendicular with respect to the substrate (Lee, par. 49-50). Re claims 28-31, 33-34, 36, see discussion regarding claims above. Claim(s) 26, 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20140293582)/ Chang (US 20150009680 ) in view of Kijima (US 20090140630) Re claim 26.17, 35.27, Lee is silent to each of the first light emitter and the second light emitter comprise a light emitting diode chip and a wavelength converter covering the light emitting diode chip. Kijima discloses a light emitter 201 is known to comprise a light emitting diode chip 4 and a wavelength converter covering the light emitting diode chip (Figs. 1-7, par. 170-172, 326-336). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Kijima for emitting a desirable wavelength via a conversion Claim(s) 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20140293582)/ Chang (US 20150009680 ) Kasai (US 20120099046) in view of Pao (US 20070273984) Re claim 32.31, wherein an angle defined between the flat face of the first region and the lower surface is less than about 90* Pao discloses an angle defined between the flat face 320 of the first region and the lower surface is less than about 90* (Fig. 5) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made to incorporate the teachings of Pao to achieve a light distribution pattern characterized by the flat face angle. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot in view of new ground of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THIEN MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-8283. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THIEN T MAI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 13 earlier events
Jul 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674890
AIMER LOCALIZATION AND TRIANGULATION IN MULTI-SENSOR SCANNER
5y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675656
GENERATING AND READING OPTICAL CODES WITH VARIABLE DENSITY TO ADAPT FOR VISUAL QUALITY AND RELIABILITY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657985
Conveyance Module Opening and Closing Device of Automated Teller Machine
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644576
AN OPTICAL DEVICE FOR MODIFYING A LIGHT DISTRIBUTION AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12626075
READING APPARATUS FOR A CONTACTLESS READOUT OF INFORMATION ON OBJECTS AND METHODS FOR SAFEGUARDING SUCH A READING APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+20.8%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 690 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month