Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/135,772

BIO-BASED, MULTIPURPOSE TWO-PART ADHESIVE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 18, 2023
Priority
Aug 03, 2022 — provisional 63/394,761
Examiner
RODD, CHRISTOPHER M
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Viridis Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
571 granted / 785 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
63.2%
+23.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 785 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Niemann (U.S. 20060276614). Niemann teaches the adhesive of the claims including amounts, hydroxy numbers, trace amounts of diisocyanate in the B side, bio based content, VOC levels, surfactants as silicone, amines and organo tin catalyst and MDI A side (Mondur MR) ¶[0035]-¶[0036], water amount, etc. The phosphated soy oil in the Abstract anticipates any phosphate plant oil. Amount of phosphorous in ¶[0022]. Exemplified phosphorous amount is 1 % (see Example 2) and, therefore, this amount can be immediately envisaged when practicing the invention of Niemann with using the phosphate plant oil. Note phosphated plant oil is not required by any claim and Claim 21 only requires an isocyanate A side and a B side with hydroxylated plant oil according to the claim which it taught by multiple examples in Niemann. No petrochemical oils are in the above example anticipating Claim 20. Approximately 30 parts of A are mixed with 70 parts B which is reasonably in the range of “approximately” of Claim 11 as there is no definition in the as-filed specification defining the limits on “approximately. Further, other examples have 24 A and 76 B which makes these proportions exemplified sufficiently specific to anticipate the range of Claim 11. Finally, ¶[0025] teaches ranges which completely encompass the specific amounts of A and B side of Claim 11 which anticipates the claimed amounts. Note the adhesive of Niemann above (¶[0035-0036]) appears to be the same adhesive as Example 4 of the as-filed spec. This Example 4 does not appear to be a comparative example. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER M RODD whose telephone number is (571)270-1299. The examiner can normally be reached 7 am - 3:30 pm (Pacific). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at (571) 272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Christopher M Rodd/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637558
SYNDIOTACTIC PROPYLENE-BASED ETHYLENE- PROPYLENE COPOLYMERS
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630671
CYCLIC OLEFIN POLYMER, CYCLIC OLEFIN POLYMER MONOMER, AND OPTICAL PRODUCT
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630658
LOW CRYSTALLINITY ETHYLENE-VINYLCYCLOHEXANE COPOLYMERS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624210
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING TIRE RUBBER ASPHALT
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623964
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING AND ENHANCING TIRE RUBBER BITUMEN
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 785 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month