Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/138,417

DOOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
WHIRLPOOL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
583 granted / 990 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
79.9%
+39.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This is a first office action on the merits of application SN 18/138,417 and filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (appliance) in the reply filed on 7/09/2025 is acknowledged. Applicant's election with traverse of Species II (figures 6 and 7) in the reply filed on 7/09/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that that figure 1 is generic and should not be part of species I. This is found persuasive, but does not affect the claims being restricted. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 4, 5, and 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention and/or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 7/09/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites a snap feature “positioned” in line 8 and “coupled” in line 9, but is not “defined” until line 14. This renders the claim indefinite since it is unclear how the snap feature is positioned and coupled since the element that defines hasn’t been claimed yet. It is suggested to define the screen and snap feature before the details/relationships of the snap feature are being claimed. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims, 2, 3, 7-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 11-16 allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY MICHAEL AYRES whose telephone number is (571)272-8299. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 11:30-8. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dan Troy can be reached at (571) 270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY M AYRES/Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 11, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12653302
STANDING DESK WITH MODULAR BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649402
RETRACTABLE TABLE FOR VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630331
Removable Metal Pallet Kit
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628949
STRUCTURE FOR ASSEMBLY TYPE FURNITURE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622514
MODULAR SYSTEM FOR BUILDING FURNITURE USING ALUMINIUM PROFILES
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+21.3%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month