Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/138,465

PEX EXPANSION TOOL

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
KHARE, ATUL P
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
365 granted / 672 resolved
-10.7% vs TC avg
Strong +73% interview lift
Without
With
+72.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
686
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 672 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 16 January 2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 11,633,775 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 16 January 2026 is acknowledged. Election/Restrictions Claim 8 is allowable, and so the restriction between Species A-B as set forth in the Office action mailed on 25 April 2025 has been reconsidered pursuant to MPEP § 821.04(a) and is hereby withdrawn due to the amendment of withdrawn species claims to depend from claim 8. In view of the above noted withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant is advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once a restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Allowable Subject Matter The pending claims would be considered allowable upon addressing the 35 U.S.C. 112 issues set forth below, in particular for the reasons set forth at Pages 3-4 of the Office action issued 16 October 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In particular: While the specification provides for an output member rotatable “in response to rotation of an input member” configured to receive rotational input from a motor shaft (spec. p. 2 [0005], original claim 8, etc.), the specification as originally filed does not support the claim 27 recitation of an output member rotatable “in response to rotation of” the motor shaft itself. Absent persuasive argument contesting this issue, appropriate correction by amendment is required. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. In particular: Since antecedent basis is not clearly conveyed, it is unclear at lines 9 and 11 of claim 27 exactly what the recited gear ratios are provided between. If these gear ratios are provided between previously recited components, then a fully supported amendment should be made identifying these components explicitly after each instance of “gear ratio”. If these gear ratios are provided between one or more components that are not recited but are essential therefor, then these one or more unrecited components must be added to the claim. Absent persuasive argument contesting this issue, appropriate correction by amendment is required. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Atul P. Khare whose telephone number is (571)270-7608. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina A. Johnson can be reached at (571) 272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Atul P. Khare/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Oct 10, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600079
DECORATIVE MOLDED PART AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600063
Method for temperature control in a molding tool for the production of molded parts from a fiber-containing material and molding station with a molding tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594701
Meal Bowl and a Production Process for The Meal Bowl
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589541
APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING ZIPPER FOR BAG AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ZIPPER FOR BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589558
MATERIAL LAYUP APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING WIND TURBINE BLADES USING FIBER PLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+72.6%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 672 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month