Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/138,732

Rear Window Clip

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
MERCADO, LOUIS A
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
529 granted / 666 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 666 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a non-final Office action responsive to the reply filed on 09/11/2025. Claim 1 has been amended. Claims 2 and 4-6 have been canceled. Claims 1 and 3 are pending. Amended drawing to Fig. 12 was filed for entry. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/12/2025 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, line 1 “a soft top vehicle” should be - - a soft top of a vehicle - -. Claim 1, line 5 “the top flat surface” should be - - a top flat surface - -. Claim 1, line 5 “a plate opening.” should be - - a plate opening, - -. Claim 1, line 8 “the screwing screw” should be - - the screwing screws - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "a secure receiver" in line 2. It is not clear that the subject matter “a secure receiver” is not properly described in the original disclosure. Appears that the secure receiver is the threaded screw receiver. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Essig et al. (US Patent No. 5,765,903). Regarding claim 1, Essig et al. discloses a device to close a window of a soft top vehicle comprising: a plurality of clips having a base, a securing plate and a plurality of screwing screws (it is inherent that the opposite side of the vehicle has a clip having a base, a securing plate and a plurality of screwing screws) where the base is flat with a hooked end having a threaded screw receiver that extends up from the top flat surface of the base (it inherent that the threaded screw receiver has threads in order to receive the screwing screw), where the securing plate has a plate opening, where the soft top has a window fold where the window fold is hooked by the hooked end of the base and held in place by the securing plate, where the securing plate is secured to the base by one of the screwing screw thru the plate opening into the threaded screw receiver where the clips turn pulling the window tight and flat against the soft top (see Fig. 1 and annotated Fig. 3). Regarding claim 3, Essig et al. further discloses comprising: where the base has a secure receiver (see annotated Fig. 3). PNG media_image1.png 403 570 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/11/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 1 Essig et al. broadly discloses the base is flat with a hooked end having a threaded screw receiver that extends up from the top flat surface of the base, where the securing plate has a plate opening, where the soft top has a window fold where the window fold is hooked by the hooked end of the base and held in place by the securing plate, where the securing plate is secured to the base by one of the screwing screw thru the plate opening into the threaded screw receiver where the clips turn pulling the window tight and flat against the soft top (see Fig. 1 and annotated Fig. 3). Examiner’s Comment In view of applicant’s amendments to the drawings and claims submitted in the reply filed on 09/11/2025, the objections to drawings, and the claim rejections under 35 USC § 103 indicated in the prior Office action have been withdrawn. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LOUIS A MERCADO whose telephone number is (571)270-5388. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason W. San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LOUIS A. MERCADO/ Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JASON W SAN/SPE, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 28, 2025
Response Filed
May 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Sep 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 12, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599246
BED SHEET RETENTION SYSTEMS, SYSTEM COMPONENTS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569038
GARMENTS WITH SEMI-PRECIOUS STONE SNAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557883
SYSTEM FOR INTERLOCKING FASTENER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553495
CORD STOPPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12540639
Fastening Clip
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month