Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/138,753

APPLICATOR, CONTAINER INCLUDING SAME, AND MOLD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Examiner
ASQIRIBA, KARIM
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shya Hsin Packaging Industry (China) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
137 granted / 236 resolved
-11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
257
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 236 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II drawn to claims 1-9 and 11-17 in the reply filed on October 29, 2025, is acknowledged. Claims 10 and 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention I, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on October 29, 2025. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “container”, “bottle”, “an inner plug”, “lid component”, “the mounting portion of the applicator is fixedly connected to the lid component”; “the applicator is provided in the bottle”, “the lid component covers the bottle”; and “the inner plug is provided at an open end of the bottle” described in claim 9 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Geka GmbH (DE202017100134 U1, hereinafter “Geka”). Claim 1. Geka discloses an applicator (Fig 1-13 and ¶0001), comprising a mounting portion (Fig 8, 8) and an application portion (annotated Fig 2. The application portion is the two curved leaf elements 4 with bristles), wherein the mounting portion and the application portion are connected to each other (Fig 2), and the application portion is provided with a first surface (annotated Fig 10, A) and a second surface (annotated Fig 10, B), wherein the first surface and the second surface are opposite to each other (Fig 10); bristles (Fig 2, 7) are arranged on the first surface (Fig 10); a recessed portion (annotated Fig 2. The recessed central curved leaf element 4 with bristles, and annotated Fig 10, C) is provided on the application portion (Fig 8 and Fig 10); and the recessed portion communicates with the first surface (Fig 8 and Fig 10, and ¶0014. Cosmetic material is stored in the hollow interior of the applicator and the bristle 7 on the first surface making communication between the recessed portion and the first surface), and the recessed portion is protruded from the second surface (Fig 2 and annotated Fig 10, the recessed portion “C” is protruding from the second surface “B”). PNG media_image1.png 402 602 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 318 624 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 2. Geka discloses the invention of claim 1. Geka further discloses the recessed portion is provided with a third surface (annotated Fig 10, D) and a fourth surface (annotated Fig 10, E); the third surface and the first surface are located at a first side of the applicator (Fig 10. “D” and “A” are located at the first side being bottom facing side); the fourth surface and the second surface are located at a second side of the applicator (Fig 2. “E” and “B” are located at a second side being top facing side); and the bristles (bristles 7) are arranged on the third surface (Fig annotated Fig 10, bristles 7 are arranged on “D”). PNG media_image3.png 324 499 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim 3. Geka discloses the invention of claim 2. Geka further discloses the recessed portion extends along a length direction of the application portion (Fig 1-2), and the recessed portion is located at a central position of the application portion (Fig 1-2). Claim 5. Geka discloses the invention of claim 3. Geka further discloses a periphery of the recessed portion is fixedly connected to the application portion (Fig 6, periphery of the recessed portion (2 or 3) is fixedly connected to the application portion). Claim 7. Geka discloses the invention of claim 3. Geka further discloses at least a part of regions in a periphery of the recessed portion is disconnected from the application portion (annotated Fig 7, outer edge of the recessed portion where gap “A” is located shows at least a part of regions in the center in a periphery of the recessed portion is disconnected from the application portion). PNG media_image4.png 950 590 media_image4.png Greyscale Claim 8. Geka discloses the invention of claim 1. Geka further discloses the application portion is a curved structure (annotated Fig 2 above and Fig 7); the first surface is a convex surface (annotated Fig 10, A above. Fig 7 and Fig 8 shows the convex surface of “A”); the second surface is a concave surface (annotated Fig 10, B. Fig 7 and Fig 8 shows the concave surface of “B”); roots of the bristles are fixedly connected to the first surface of the application portion (Fig 10); and heads of the bristles extend toward a direction away from the second surface (annotated Fig 10 above), and the heads of the bristles are free ends (Fig 10). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geka Gmbh (DE 202017100134 U1, hereinafter “Geka”). Claim 4. Geka discloses the invention of claim 3. Geka further discloses a length of the recessed portion is defined as Ll (annotated Fig 11, L1), a length of the application portion is defined as L2 (annotated Fig 11, L2); and a width of the recessed portion is defined as Bl (annotated Fig 11, B1), a width of the application portion is defined as B2 (annotated Fig 11, B2). Geka is silent to 0.5L2<Ll<L2 and 0.5 B2<B1<B2. PNG media_image5.png 462 728 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 462 726 media_image6.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the dimensions of the length and width of the recessed portion and the application portion of Geka’s applicator to be 0.5L2<Ll<L2 and 0.5B2<B1<B2 such that the length of the recessed portion is defined as L1, length of the application portion is defined as L2; width of the recessed portion is defined as Bl, and width of the application portion is defined as B2. Such modification would allow the user to efficiently load the applicator with cosmetic material and hold sufficient cosmetic material, and allow the user to apply more cosmetic material on a single use of the applicator. In addition, the instant disclosure describes the selection of these dimensions as merely optional [¶0009] and does not describe it as contributing any unexpected result to the applicator. As such, the selection of the dimensions of the recessed portion and the application portion are deemed matters of design choice (lacking in any criticality), well within the skill of the ordinary artisan, obtained through routine experimentation in determining optimum results. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geka Gmbh (DE 202017100134 U1, hereinafter “Geka”) in view of De Bardonneche (US 20180220785 A1, hereinafter “De Bardonneche”). Claim 6. Geka discloses the invention of claim 5, and further discloses a cross section of the recessed portion along a width direction is V-shaped (Fig 11), but silent to the bristles are arranged on the fourth surface of the recessed portion. De Bardonneche teaches a cosmetic applicator (abstract and Fig 1-Fig 18A) including a mounting portion (Fig 4, 10) and an application portion (Fig 4, 20), wherein the mounting portion and the application portion are connected to each other (Fig 4), and the application portion is provided with a first surface (annotated Fig 4, A) and a second surface (annotated Fig 4, B), wherein the first surface and the second surface are opposite to each other (Fig 4); bristles are arranged on the first surface (annotated Fig 4, bristles are arranged on first surface “A”); a recessed portion (annotated Fig 4, C) is provided on the application portion (Fig 4); and the recessed portion communicates with the first surface (Fig 4), and the recessed portion is protruded from the second surface (Fig 4); the recessed portion (annotated Fig 4, C) is provided with a third surface (annotated Fig 4, D) and a fourth surface (annotated Fig 4, E); the bristles are arranged on the fourth surface of the recessed portion (annotated Fig 4. Bristles are arranged on fourth surface “E) to allow an efficient pick up of the cosmetic material, an efficient control of distribution of the cosmetic material, and an efficient placement of the cosmetic material on the user’s skin in order to meet the user’s needs and preferences. PNG media_image7.png 449 810 media_image7.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the fourth surface of the recessed potion and arrange bristles on the fourth surface of Geka’s applicator, as taught by De Bardonneche. Such modification would allow an efficient pick up of the cosmetic material, an efficient control of distribution of the cosmetic material, and an efficient placement of the cosmetic material on the user’s skin in order to meet the user’s needs and preferences. Claims 9, 11-14 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geka Gmbh (DE 202017100134 U1, hereinafter “Geka”) in view of Cattani et al (US 20220039539 A1, hereinafter “Catani”). Claim 9. Geka discloses the invention of claim 1, but silent to a container comprising the applicator according to claim l, a bottle, an inner plug, and a lid component, wherein the mounting portion of the applicator is fixedly connected to the lid component; the applicator is provided in the bottle, and the lid component covers the bottle; and the inner plug is provided at an open end of the bottle. Cattani teaches a container (Fig 4, container 2) for cosmetic product (abstract) including a bottle (Fig 4, bottle 4), an inner plug (Fig 4, inner plug 11), and a lid component (Fig 4, lid 3), wherein the mounting portion (Fig 4, 20) of the applicator (16) is connected to the lid component (¶0034); the applicator (16) is provided in the bottle (Fig 3 and Fig 4), and the lid component covers the bottle (Fig 1); and the inner plug is provided at an open end of the bottle (Fig 4 and ¶0031) to provide a container for cosmetic products in general, and for the eyes and lips in particular, which, unlike similar containers known in the art, can be recovered and therefore used again (¶0005). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use the applicator of Geka with the container, as taught by Cattani, to provide a container for cosmetic products in general, and for the eyes and lips in particular, which, unlike similar containers known in the art, can be recovered and therefore used again. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the time the invention was made to fixedly connect the mounting portion of the applicator to the lid component of the combination device of Geka and Cattani, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Claim 11. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 9. Geka further teaches in the applicator, the recessed portion is provided with a third surface (annotated Fig 10, D) and a fourth surface (annotated Fig 10, E); the third surface and the first surface are located at a first side of the applicator (Fig 10. “D” and “A” are located at the first side being bottom facing side); the fourth surface and the second surface are located at a second side of the applicator (Fig 2. “E” and “B” are located at a second side being top facing side); and the bristles (bristles 7) are arranged on the third surface (Fig annotated Fig 10, bristles 7 are arranged on “D”). PNG media_image3.png 324 499 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim 12. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 11. Geka further teaches in the applicator, the recessed portion extends along a length direction of the application portion (Fig 1-2), and the recessed portion is located at a central position of the application portion (Fig 1-2). Claim 13. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 12. Geka further teaches in the applicator, a length of the recessed portion is defined as L1 (annotated Fig 11, L1), a length of the application portion is defined as L2 (annotated Fig 11, L2), and a width of the recessed portion is defined as B1 (annotated Fig 11, B1), a width of the application portion is defined as B2 (annotated Fig 11, B2); but silent to 0.5L2<Ll<L2 and 0.5B<B 1<B2. PNG media_image5.png 462 728 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 462 726 media_image6.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the dimensions of the length and width of the recessed portion and the application portion of Geka’s applicator to be 0.5L2<Ll<L2 and 0.5B2<B1<B2 such that the length of the recessed portion is defined as L1, length of the application portion is defined as L2; width of the recessed portion is defined as Bl, and width of the application portion is defined as B2. Such modification would allow the user to efficiently load the applicator with cosmetic material and hold sufficient cosmetic material, and allow the user to apply more cosmetic material on a single use of the applicator. In addition, the instant disclosure describes the selection of these dimensions as merely optional [¶0009] and does not describe it as contributing any unexpected result to the applicator. As such, the selection of the dimensions of the recessed portion and the application portion are deemed matters of design choice (lacking in any criticality), well within the skill of the ordinary artisan, obtained through routine experimentation in determining optimum results. Claim 14. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 12. Geka further teaches wherein in the applicator, a periphery of the recessed portion is fixedly connected to the application portion (Fig 6, periphery of the recessed portion (2 or 3) is fixedly connected to the application portion). Claim 16. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 12. Geka further teaches in the applicator, at least a part of regions in a periphery of the recessed portion is disconnected from the application portion (annotated Fig 7, outer edge of the recessed portion where gap “A” is located shows at least a part of regions in the center in a periphery of the recessed portion is disconnected from the application portion). PNG media_image4.png 950 590 media_image4.png Greyscale Claim 17. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 9. Geka further teaches in the applicator, the application portion is a curved structure (annotated Fig 2 above and Fig 7); the first surface is a convex surface (annotated Fig 10, A above. Fig 7 and Fig 8 shows the convex surface of “A”); the second surface is a concave surface (annotated Fig 10, B. Fig 7 and Fig 8 shows the concave surface of “B”); roots of the bristles are fixedly connected to the first surface of the application portion (Fig 10); and heads of the bristles extend toward a direction away from the second surface (annotated Fig 10 above), and the heads of the bristles are free ends (Fig 10). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geka Gmbh (DE 202017100134 U1, hereinafter “Geka”) in view of Cattani et al (US 20220039539 A1, hereinafter “Catani”) as applied to claim 14 above, and further in view of De Bardonneche (US 20180220785 A1, hereinafter “De Bardonneche”). Claim 15. Geka and Cattani teach the invention of claim 14. Geka further teaches a cross section of the recessed portion along a width direction is V-shaped (Fig 11), but silent to the bristles are arranged on the fourth surface of the recessed portion. De Bardonneche teaches a cosmetic applicator (abstract and Fig 1-Fig 18A) including a mounting portion (Fig 4, 10) and an application portion (Fig 4, 20), wherein the mounting portion and the application portion are connected to each other (Fig 4), and the application portion is provided with a first surface (annotated Fig 4, A) and a second surface (annotated Fig 4, B), wherein the first surface and the second surface are opposite to each other (Fig 4); bristles are arranged on the first surface (annotated Fig 4, bristles are arranged on first surface “A”); a recessed portion (annotated Fig 4, C) is provided on the application portion (Fig 4); and the recessed portion communicates with the first surface (Fig 4), and the recessed portion is protruded from the second surface (Fig 4); the recessed portion (annotated Fig 4, C) is provided with a third surface (annotated Fig 4, D) and a fourth surface (annotated Fig 4, E); the bristles are arranged on the fourth surface of the recessed portion (annotated Fig 4. Bristles are arranged on fourth surface “E) to allow an efficient pick up of the cosmetic material, an efficient control of distribution of the cosmetic material, and an efficient placement of the cosmetic material on the user’s skin in order to meet the user’s needs and preferences. PNG media_image7.png 449 810 media_image7.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the fourth surface of the recessed potion and arrange bristles on the fourth surface of the combination of Geka and Cattani device, as taught by De Bardonneche. Such modification would allow an efficient pick up of the cosmetic material, an efficient control of distribution of the cosmetic material, and an efficient placement of the cosmetic material on the user’s skin in order to meet the user’s needs and preferences. Conclusion Additional references were also reviewed during the examination of this application and listed for your reference in the notice of reference cited form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KARIM ASQIRIBA whose telephone number is 571- 270-3416. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached on 571-270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KARIM ASQIRIBA/Examiner, Art Unit 3772 /EDELMIRA BOSQUES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599212
METHOD FOR TREATING THE HAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599213
HAIR TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599219
APPLICATORS AND CASES FOR ARTIFICIAL LASH EXTENSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588744
HAIRDRESSING AND STYLING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582184
WIG BASE, WIG AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR WIG BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+45.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month