Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/139,342

SINUS DILATION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Examiner
KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medtronic Xomed, LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
290 granted / 408 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
443
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 408 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/11/25 has been entered. Response to Amendment Claims 19-38 are pending in the application. Claims 1-18 have been canceled. Claims 19 and 29 have been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19-22, 24-32, and 34-38 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Drontle et al. (US 2010/0312101 A1) (“Drontle”) in view of Heimbecher (US 2012/0173217 A1). Regarding claims 19 and 20, Drontle discloses (Figures 1-12) a sinus dilation instrument configured for accessing a region of a patient's nasal sinus system, the sinus dilation instrument comprising: a handle (12) including a tracking device (60); a probe (14) including a proximal end portion (21) coupled to the handle (Figure 7), a distal tip portion (44) opposite the proximal end portion (Figures 6A-6C), and a curved segment (16) disposed between the proximal end portion and the distal tip portion (Figures 6A, 6B); a balloon (36) coupled to the probe (Figure 7). Drontle discloses (Figures 6A-6C) that the degree of curvature of the curved segment is pre-shaped and the nature and degree of the curved segment is configured to reach specific anatomy (paragraphs 0025 and 0040-0041). For example, in Figure 6A, the “U” shape curved of the curved segment is useful to treat hard to reach ostia, such as the maxillary ostium. In Figure 6B, the radius of curvature is less pronounced, to treat a frontal recess anatomy (paragraph 0041). However, Drontle fails to disclose a connector associated with the handle and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system; and an electronic identifier device electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including of a location within a patient's nasal sinus system assigned to the sinus dilation instrument, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system. Heimbecher teaches (Figures 1-5) an analogous catheter system. Heimbecher teaches a connector associated with the handle (38, Figure 1) and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system (22); and an electronic identifier device (28) electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including of a location within a patient's anatomy assigned to a catheter, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system (paragraphs 0034-0035). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the sinus dilation instrument disclosed by Drontle to include a connector associated with the handle and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system; and an electronic identifier device electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including a location within a patient's nasal sinus system assigned to the sinus dilation instrument, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system, as taught by Heimbecher. This modification would identify the type of catheter for use in the diagnostic or therapeutic procedure and would identify the target location for diagnosis or treatment (Heimbecher, paragraphs 0034-0035). Regarding claim 21, the balloon taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher is capable of being disposed in fixed spatial relation (such as Figures 10 and 11 of Drontle) relative to the tracking device (60) of the handle. Regarding claim 22, the probe taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher defines a rigid configuration (Drontle, paragraph 0025) such that the balloon is capable of being disposed in fixed spatial relation (such as Figures 10 and 11 of Drontle) relative to the tracking device (60) of the handle. Regarding claim 24, the tracking device (60) taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher tracks movement of the balloon (Drontle, paragraph 0044). Regarding claim 25, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches (Drontle, Figure 6B) that the assigned location is a frontal sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Regarding claim 26, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches (Drontle, Figure 6A) that the assigned location is a maxillary sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Regarding claim 27, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches that the assigned location is a sphenoid sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Regarding claim 28, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches (Drontle, Figure 5A) an inflation path (48) fluidly connected to an interior of the balloon (Drontle, paragraph 0027). Regarding claims 29, 30, and 38, Drontle discloses (Figures 1-12) a sinus dilation instrument configured for accessing a region of a patient's nasal sinus system, the sinus dilation instrument comprising: a handle (12) including a tracking device (60); a probe (14) including a proximal end portion attached to the handle (Figure 7), a distal tip portion opposite the proximal end portion (Figure 6), and a curved segment disposed between the proximal end portion and the distal tip portion (Figure 2; paragraph 0045); a balloon (14) secured to the probe and capable of being disposed in fixed spatial relation (such as Figures 10 and 11 of Drontle) relative to the handle (12); and an inflation path (48) fluidly connected to an interior of the balloon (paragraph 0027). Drontle discloses (Figures 6A-6C) that the degree of curvature of the curved segment is pre-shaped and the nature and degree of the curved segment is configured to reach specific anatomy (paragraphs 0025 and 0040-0041). For example, in Figure 6A, the “U” shape curved of the curved segment is useful to treat hard to reach ostia, such as the maxillary ostium. In Figure 6B, the radius of curvature is less pronounced, to treat a frontal recess anatomy (paragraph 0041). However, Drontle fails to disclose a connector associated with the handle and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system; and an electronic identifier device electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including a sinus procedure to be performed that is assigned to the sinus dilation instrument, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system. Heimbecher teaches (Figures 1-5) an analogous catheter system. Heimbecher teaches a connector associated with the handle (38, Figure 1) and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system (22); and an electronic identifier device (28) electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including a procedure to be performed that is assigned to the catheter, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system (paragraphs 0034-0035). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the sinus dilation instrument disclosed by Drontle to include a connector associated with the handle and configured to electronically couple to an image guidance system; and an electronic identifier device electronically coupled to the connector, the electronic identifier device storing information including a sinus procedure to be performed that is assigned to the sinus dilation instrument, wherein the connector is configured to transmit the information from the electronic identifier device to the image guidance system when the connector is electronically coupled to the image guidance system, as taught by Heimbecher. This modification would identify the type of catheter for use in the diagnostic or therapeutic procedure and would identify the target location for diagnosis or treatment (Heimbecher, paragraphs 0034-0035). Regarding claim 31, the balloon taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher is capable of being disposed in fixed spatial relation (such as Figures 10 and 11 of Drontle) relative to the tracking device (60) of the handle. Regarding claim 32, the probe taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher defines a rigid configuration (Drontle, paragraph 0025) such that the balloon is capable of being disposed in fixed spatial relation (such as Figures 10 and 11 of Drontle) relative to the tracking device (60) of the handle. Regarding claim 34, the tracking device (60) taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher tracks movement of the balloon (Drontle, paragraph 0044). Regarding claim 35, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches (Drontle, Figure 6B) that the assigned location is a frontal sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Regarding claim 36, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches (Drontle, Figure 6A) that the assigned location is a maxillary sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Regarding claim 37, Drontle as modified by Heimbecher teaches that the assigned location is a sphenoid sinus (Drontle, paragraph 0041). Claims 23 and 33 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Drontle et al. (US 2010/0312101 A1) (“Drontle”) in view of Heimbecher (US 2012/0173217 A1) as applied to claims 20 and 30 respectively above, and further in view of Chang et al. (US 2006/0004286 A1). Regarding claims 23 and 33, Drontle in view of Heimbecher teaches the tracking device (60) may include an antenna, transmitter, optical reflectors, or the like that communicates a wireless signal that is then received and processed to determine the orientation and/or positioning of the balloon dilation catheter. In certain embodiments, more than one tracking device (60) may be disposed on the balloon dilation catheter (Drontle, paragraphs 0042 and 0044). However, Drontle in view of Heimbecher fails to teach an electromagnetically detectable receiver coil that generates tracking information for display by the image guidance system. In the same field of endeavor, Chang teaches (Figures 4-4B) a sinus dilation instrument that comprises a tracking device that includes an electromagnetically detectable receiver coil (16), wherein the tracking device tracks movement and positioning of the balloon (paragraphs 0081). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the sinus dilation instrument taught by Drontle in view of Heimbecher to further comprise an electromagnetically detectable receiver coil that generates tracking information for display by the image guidance system and tracking movement and positioning of the balloon during the step of pushing the distal tip end along the nasal sinus system of the patient to a target site, as taught by Chang. This modification would provide an accurate real time indication of the positioning and movement of the balloon during the treatment procedure (Chang, paragraph 0019). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 19-38 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Goldfarb et al. (US 2008/0195041 A1) also teach (Figure 2) that different curvatures are useable to access the ostia of different sinuses. For example, a 70 degree guide is used to access the ostium of frontal sinus. A 90 degree or 110 degree guide is used to access the ostium of a maxillary sinus (paragraph 0045). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTIAN D KNAUSS whose telephone number is (571)272-8641. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12:30-8:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 571-272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.D.K/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /DIANE D YABUT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 06, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 23, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599500
OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582801
MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569241
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR SUTURE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551360
STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12539140
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR GUIDING A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 408 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month