Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/139,387

TECHNIQUE FOR ADJUSTING CHARGING OPERATION OR DISCHARGING OPERATION OF EXTERNAL DEVICE BY BATTERY PACK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 26, 2023
Examiner
TSO, EDWARD H
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Makita Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1098 granted / 1260 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1297
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed 4/26/23 has been considered and placed of record. The initialed copy is attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by document JP2019075955A. See translation. Re claim 1, the document discloses a battery pack 2 having, inter alia, a rechargeable battery 10 including (i) a positive electrode, (ii) a negative electrode, and (iii) at least one battery cell; a first power supply terminal 11 configured to be detachably coupled to a positive electrode terminal of an external device 40; a second power supply terminal 12 configured to be detachably coupled to a negative electrode terminal of the external device 40; a first signal terminal 18 configured to be detachably coupled to a first corresponding terminal of the external device 40; a second signal terminal 14 configured to be detachably coupled to a second corresponding terminal of the external device 40; a positive-side current path (i) electrically coupling the first power supply terminal to the positive electrode of the rechargeable battery or (ii) configured to electrically couple the first power supply terminal to the positive electrode of the rechargeable battery (positive-side current path is same path as first supply terminal 11 to the positive side of battery 10); a negative-side current path (i) electrically coupling the second power supply terminal to the negative electrode of the rechargeable battery or (ii) configured to electrically couple the second power supply terminal to the negative electrode of the rechargeable battery (negative-side current path is same path as second supply terminal 12 to the negative side of battery 10) ; a temperature signal generation circuit 22 (i) including a temperature detection device and (ii) configured to generate a temperature signal across the first signal terminal and the second signal terminal (signal terminals 14,18 communicate with charge signal and battery control for voltage/current/temperature), the temperature detection device having a variable resistance that is dependent on a battery temperature (pars 24), the temperature signal having a voltage associated with the variable resistance (para 24), and the battery temperature corresponding to a temperature of (i) the rechargeable battery or (ii) the at least one battery cell (dotted line to the battery 10); a biasing circuit 30 configured to bias the voltage of the temperature signal, wherein the voltage biased makes the external device reduce or stop (i) charging from the external device to the rechargeable battery (control unit 30 stopping operation according to temperature) and/or (ii) discharging from the rechargeable battery to the external device; and a control circuit configured to operate the biasing circuit based on a battery status (control unit 30 sets charge completion based on temperature of battery), the battery status corresponding to (i) a status of the rechargeable battery and/or (ii) a status of the at least one battery cell. See figures 1-2. Re claim 15, the document further discloses the negative electrode terminal of the external device is common with the second corresponding terminal of the external device (shared through charge control circuit 60); and the second power supply terminal of the battery pack is common with the second signal terminal of the battery pack (shared through monitoring circuit). Re claim 16, the document further discloses a temperature detection circuit 22 configured to detect the battery temperature; and/or a voltage detection circuit configured to detect a battery voltage, the battery voltage corresponding to a voltage of (i) the rechargeable battery or (ii) the at least one battery cell, and wherein the battery status includes (i) the battery temperature detected by the temperature detection circuit (S320), and/or (ii) the battery voltage detected by the voltage detection circuit. Re claim 17, the document further discloses the external device is a charger or a battery-operated device. Figure 1. Re claim 18, the document discloses a method for adjusting charging and/or discharging between a battery pack and an external device having, inter alia, outputting a temperature signal 22 from the battery pack to the external device, the temperature signal having a voltage associated with a variable resistance of a temperature detection device in the battery pack , the variable resistance being dependent on a temperature of (i) a rechargeable battery in the battery pack or (ii) at least one battery cell in the rechargeable battery (para 24), and the external device being coupled to the battery pack; and biasing the voltage of the temperature signal based on (i) a status of the rechargeable battery (control unit 30 stopping operation according to temperature) and/or (ii) a status of the at least one battery cell, wherein the voltage biased makes the external device reduce or stop (i) charging from the external device to the rechargeable battery (control unit 30 sets charge completion based on temperature of battery) and/or (ii) discharging from the rechargeable battery to the external device. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over document JP2019075955A in view of document CN114112092A. Re claim 2, the JP document further discloses the temperature signal generation circuit includes a pair of terminals (i) respectively coupled to the first signal terminal and the second signal terminal (through 14 and 18) and (ii) configured to receive an input voltage across the pair of terminals at least para 24); the temperature signal generation circuit is configured to generate the temperature signal having the voltage based on the electrical resistance in response to an electric current flowing across the pair of terminals through the temperature detection device (para 24); and it only provided description in boxes). The CN document teaches a temperature measuring circuit having voltage dividing resistors and biasing circuit to measure the varying voltage across the connectors. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have incorporated the circuit components of the CN document into the temperature signal circuit of JP to ensure the proper temperature is measured at the terminals. Re claim 4, the JP document further discloses the temperature signal generation circuit 22 includes a first current path (line between 22 and 30) electrically coupling the pair of terminals with one another (14, 18); and the temperature detection device 22 is on the first current path (line between 22 and 30). Fig 2. Re claim 5, the JP document further discloses the biasing circuit ensure change in temperature is measured to halt charging). Official notice is taken of the fact that having a resistor in the current path would allow for measuring the resistance across the current path. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have included a resistor in the current path in order to measure the resistance across the path. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over document JP2019075955A in view of document CN114112092A and further in view of document WO2019014949A1. The JP document further discloses the external device (fig 3; 40) . Claims 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over document JP2019075955A in view of document CN114112092A and further in view of Seong et al. (US 2020/0186093). Re claim 6, JP and CN documents do not suggest the bias circuit having a second current path in parallel with the first resistor and the first switch is on the second path and control circuit configured to switch on/off state. Seong teaches bias circuit 210 having resistor circuit 211 sets up as claimed bias circuit (fig 2; para 57-58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have incorporated the bias circuit 211 of Seong in the JP document in view of CN document to improve the varying of the resistance in response to the voltage for better control. Re claims 7 and 8, the three documents do not suggest switching based on the particular of first and second temperature ranges. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have selected any particular range of temperatures since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. Re claim 9, the three documents do not suggest having a third current path with a second resistor and second switch in parallel with the second current path. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have added an additional switch and resistor combination in parallel with the first switch since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known materiale on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Re claim 10, the three documents do not suggest switching the switches in the claimed patterns and having an additional fourth and fifth temperature ranges. Official notice is taken of the fact that switching the switches in particular patterns to achieve a particular result would have been recognized as being within a level of ordinary skill in the art. Therefore, it would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have switched the multiple switches to achieve a desired result would have been recognized as being within a level of ordinary skill in the art. In addition, it would also have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have selected any particular range of temperatures since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. Re claim 11, the three documents do not suggest switching the first and second switch to on/off state when the temperature is within the fourth temperature range. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have selected the fourth temperature range out of other claimed temperature ranges since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Re claim 12, the three documents do not suggest having a fourth current path with a third resistor and a third switch in parallel with the fourth current path. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have added an additional switch and resistor combination in parallel with the other switches/resistors since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known materiale on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Re claim 13, the three documents do not suggest having the third switch and a combined first resistor, second resistor and resistance of the temperature detection device switching on/off based on a sixth temperature range. It would have been well within the skill of one versed in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have selected a sixth temperature range for switching, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over document JP2019075955A in view of Gignac (US 6,707,273). The JP document does not disclose the temperature detection device (i) has a negative temperature coefficient and (ii) is configured such that the variable resistance decreases in accordance with an increase in the battery temperature. Gignac teaches a temperature-controlled battery charger having a negative temperature coefficient thermistor that has a variable resistance that changes in value to the inverse of the temperature being sensed for a more accurate sense. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have applied the NTC thermistor of Gignac to the JP document to increase the accuracy of the temperature sense. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Art made of record exemplified the art of batteries having a temperature thermistor. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to the Examiner at the below-listed number. The Examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thu from 7:00am-5:00pm. The Examiner’s SPE is Taelor Kim and he can be reached at 571.270.7166. The fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /EDWARD TSO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 571.272.2087
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 19, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603523
ELECTRONIC CHARGING SHELF SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597782
CHARGER INCLUDING MULTIPLE ADJUSTABLE POWER SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597787
DATA LINE AND CHARGING DEVICE WITH SWITCHABLE CONFIGURATION CHANNEL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587022
A BATTERY STORAGE SYSTEM WITH MULTI-LEVEL CONVERTER AND MULTIPLE STORAGE SECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580418
GROUND ASSEMBLY FOR AN INDUCTIVE CHARGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month