Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/140,270

WINDING ARRANGEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 27, 2023
Priority
May 05, 2022 — GB 2206600.5
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1014 granted / 1245 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1306
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1245 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 5, Figures 7A-7E in the reply filed on 3/26/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Species 1 [Figures 2A-3F] and 5 [Figures 7A-7E] should be examined together. This is found persuasive. Claims 1-5 and 12-20 will be examined herewith. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Objections Claim 17 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 17 is depended on claim 17. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 12-18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroyuki et al. [JP 2004-103624 A] in view of Yang [CN 104505248 A]. Regarding claims 1, 16, 18 and 20, Hiroyuki et al. discloses a transformer comprising: - a core; and - primary and secondary coils [1a, 1b] arranged around a center post of the core, wherein the primary and secondary coils having turns interleaved [figures 1-2] and wherein each of the primary and the secondary coils include flat wire having a rectangular, square, or circular shape [figures 1-2]. Aluminum is a known conductive material use for the coils in transformer. Hiroyuki et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific of the primary and secondary coils. Yang discloses a coil structure [figures 1-2] comprising two coils [10, 11], wherein each coil includes a first section [101/111] and a second section [102/112], and each of the first and second sections include a first set of turns having a first diameter and a second set of turns having a second diameter with the first diameter is larger than the second diameter [figure 2]. Yang further discloses the first and second sections are wound around a common winding axis, with the second set of turns of the second section positioned within the first set of turns of the first section, and the second set of turns of the first section positioned within the first set of turns of the second section, when viewed along the common winding axis [figure 2]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the coil structure of Yang in Hiroyuki et al. for the purpose of enhancing the inductances. The specific electrically parallel connection of the coil sections would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of combining two sections into one. Regarding claim 3, Hiroyuki et al. discloses turns of the primary coil and turns of the second coil alternate along the common winding axis [figures 1-2]. Regarding claims 4-5 and 12, Hiroyuki et al. discloses the primary and secondary coils are identical, wherein the coils rotated/arranged by 180 degrees about the common winding axis and fully overlap when viewed along the common winding axis [figures 1-2]. Regarding claim 13, Yang discloses a number of turns in the first set of turns of the first section and a number of turns in the first set of turns of the second section are equal, and a number of turns in the second set of turns of the first section and a number of turns in the second set of turns of the second section are equal. Regarding claims 14-15, Yang discloses for each of the first and the second sections of each of the primary and the secondary coils, a number of turns in the first set of turns is equal to a number of turns in the second set of turns, wherein the first set of turns and the second set of turns of each of the first and the second sections of each of the primary and the secondary coils are concentric about the common winding axis [figure 2]. Regarding claim 17, the specific width and/or thickness of the flat wire would have been an obvious design consideration based on the intended applications and/or environments uses. Claim(s) 2 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hiroyuki et al. in view of Yang as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Honna et al. [WO 2012/169325 B1]. Hiroyuki et al. in view of Yang disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific interleaved of the primary and secondary coils. Honna et al. discloses a transformer comprising: - a core [3]; and - primary and secondary coils [1, 2] arranged about the core, wherein the primary and secondary coils arranged in alternate arrangements [figures 2, 4, 9, 11, 15-16 ….49, 54]. Honna et al. discloses the number of turns of the primary coil different than that of the secondary coil [turn ratio, primary coil having more turns than secondary coil, see specification and figures 1-6 and 14-18]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use turn ratio design of Honna et al. in Hiroyuki for the purpose of facilitating different voltages and/or current for various applications. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683065
COIL COMPONENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665120
REACTOR, CONVERTER, AND POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665121
Stationary Induction Electric Apparatus
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665124
COIL COMPONENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658353
REACTOR, CONVERTER, AND POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1245 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month