Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/140,632

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RENDERING DATA FOR ADDRESSABLE DISPENSING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 28, 2023
Priority
Aug 29, 2017 — provisional 62/551,279 +2 more
Examiner
GRACE, KELSEY C
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Stratasys, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
240 granted / 297 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
316
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 297 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 18-20 in the reply filed on March 13, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on March 13, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18-21 and 24-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Pena, et al. (US 2016/0332384). In reference to Claim 18, Pena discloses a coordinate transformation algorithm used to map coordinates of temperature distribution to the spatial coordinates of the layer of the material ([0066]) (a system for rendering data for addressable dispensing of material over a working surface), the data from the temperature distribution is interpolated if the image is not sufficiently captured ([0067]) (the system comprising: an input circuit for receiving input image data arranged grid-wise over a plurality of picture-elements); the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) (a first processor configured for generating an initial map describing a distance field perpendicular to the working surface and having a plurality of map-elements each storing distance information corresponding to one picture-element); and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (a second processor configured for linearly scanning said map), the carriage can move bi-directionally ([0035]-[0037]) (independently along a first axis and along a second axis), the camera is used to capture the image ([0052]) (for each picture-element of at least a portion of said picture-elements), and adjusting the image ([0052]) (for updating a respective map-element based on values of map-elements visited during said scan). In reference to Claim 19, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses different types of processors in the controller ([0023]-[0025]) (first processor is a graphics processing unit (GPU) and said wherein said second processor is a central processing unit (CPU) of the same computer system). In reference to Claim 20, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses an agent distributor, such as a printhead, used to apply the material ([0029]-[0034]) (a three-dimensional fabrication apparatus having a plurality of dispensing heads configured to dispense building materials; a controller designed and constructed to receive said dispensing instructions and to operate said dispensing heads according to said dispensing instructions). In reference to Claim 21, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses the carriage can move bi-directionally ([0035]-[0037]) (first and said second axes are orthogonal axes). In reference to Claim 24, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses x and y axes ([0036]) and creating the image on the x and y coordinates ([0067]) (grid is a two-dimensional grid describing coordinates of picture-elements of a two-dimensional image). In reference to Claim 25, Pena discloses the system of Claim 24, as described above. Pena discloses the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (first processor is configured to generate said initial map by setting one of two predetermined values for each map- element, wherein a first value of said two predetermined values is set when a respective picture-element is on a boundary of an object in said image, and a second value of said two predetermined values is set otherwise). In reference to Claim 26, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (at least one of said first and said second processors is configured to designate a material to be dispensed for each picture- element of at least a portion of said picture-elements, based at least in part on a respective map-element, to generate dispensing instructions readable by a controller of a printer based on said designation, and to transmit said dispensing instructions to said controller). In reference to Claim 27, Pena discloses the system of Claim 18, as described above. Pena discloses the grid may represent a three-dimensional model ([0071]) (grid is a three-dimensional grid describing coordinates of picture-elements of a three-dimensional image). In reference to Claim 28, Pena discloses the system of Claim 27, as described above. Pena discloses the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (at least one of said first and said second processors is configured to slice said input image data, wherein said first processor is configured to generate said initial map separately for each slice thereby forming a sub-map corresponding only to picture-element of said slice, and wherein said second processor is configured to scan said sub-map). In reference to Claim 29, Pena discloses the system of Claim 27, as described above. Pena discloses the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (at least one of said first and said second processors is configured to designate, for at least one sub-map, and for each picture-element of at least a portion of picture-elements corresponding to said sub-map, a material to be dispensed based at least in part on a respective map-element of said sub-map, to generate dispensing instructions readable by a controller of a printer based on said designation, and to transmit said dispensing instructions to said controller). In reference to Claim 30, Pena discloses the system of Claim 29, as described above. Pena discloses the processor using the memory to create the product ([0023]-[0025]) and using the laser to scan the build material ([0047]) (dispensing instructions comprise a material bitmap having a plurality of bitmap-elements, each storing information pertaining to a material to be dispensed, and said at least one of said first and said second processors is configured purge said sub-map from a memory following said generation of said material bitmap). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 22-23 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not disclose taxicab or Euclidean metrics. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELSEY C GRACE whose telephone number is (571)270-1113. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST, Friday 7:00 AM - 11:00 AM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KELSEY C. GRACE Examiner Art Unit 1742 /CHRISTINA A JOHNSON/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595346
POLYOLEFIN-BASED COMPOSITION FOR A LID AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12528242
METHOD FOR PRODUCING RESIN VESSEL MADE OF RESIN, MOULD UNIT AND MOULDING APPARATUS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12478485
PREPARATION METHOD OF A HIP JOINT BONE CEMENT PLACEHOLDER
4m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12453390
REMOVEABLE HELMET COVER AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 12441658
NON-HYDRATION STRENGTH IN CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITIONS
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.5%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 297 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month