Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/142,360

PISTON FOR WIND INSTRUMENTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 02, 2023
Examiner
LOCKETT, KIMBERLY R
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Conn-Selmer Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
972 granted / 1177 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1200
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1177 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 6, 8-13, 16, 17, 20, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wasser et al (US20060219083) in view of Brehm (20240371344). Regarding claim 1, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses a method of making a piston (30) for a wind instrument, the method comprising: removing a first portion of material from a single piece of the material to form a plurality of ports (see the material removed from the areas that create 18a and 18b) and one or more windways each connecting at least a subset of the plurality of ports (18a, 18b). Wasser does not specifically disclose treating a surface of the piston. Brehm discloses the use of a piston where the surface is treated a surface o by at least one of hard coat anodizing the surface or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sealing the surface (see paragraph 0027). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include the PTFE as disclosed in Brehn in order to minimize risk. Regarding claim 2, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the single piece of the material comprises a cylindrical rod of the material (see the cylindrical body in figure 6). Regarding claim 3, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the material comprises aluminum, an aluminum alloy, brass, a nickel-copper alloy, or stainless steel (see paragraph 0059). Regarding claim 6, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses that the use of CNC machining is conventional and well known in the art (see paragraph 0059). Wasser and Brehm do not specifically disclose removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material comprise s removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material using a computer numerical control (CNC) machine. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include the single piece of the material, the treated surface as disclosed in Brehm, and removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material using a computer numerical control (CNC) machine since the use of removing material using CNC machines is conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claim 8, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses one or more mounting holes. Wasser does not disclose a method of drilling the mounting holes. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include drilling of the mounting holes since drilling is a method that is well known in the art. Regarding claim 9, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses a second portion of material removed from the single piece of material to form a recessed feature configured to receive a spring (see the recessed feature in figure 21). Regarding claim 10 Wasser and Brehm do not disclose the use of a centerless grinder. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser, the treated surface as disclosed in Brehm, and the use of a centerless grinder since the use of centerless grinder is conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claim 11, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses a piston (30) for a wind instrument, the piston comprising (30): a one-piece body, the one-piece body defining: a plurality of ports (18a, 18b) ; and one or more windways each connecting at least a subset of the plurality of ports, wherein the plurality of ports (18a, 18b) and the one or more windways are formed by processing a single piece of a material to remove a portion of the material from the single piece (see the material removed from the areas that create 18a and 18b). Wasser does not specifically disclose treating a surface of the piston. Brehm discloses the use of a piston where the surface is treated a surface o by at least one of hard coat anodizing the surface or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sealing the surface (see paragraph 0027). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include the PTFE as disclosed in Brehn in order to minimize risk. Regarding claim 12, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the single piece of the material comprises a cylindrical rod of the material (see the cylindrical body in figure 6). Regarding claim 13, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the one-piece body is made of aluminum, an aluminum alloy, brass, a nickel-copper alloy, or stainless steel (see paragraph 0059). Regarding claim 16, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses that the use of CNC machining is conventional and well known in the art. Wasser does not specifically disclose removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material comprises removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material using a computer numerical control (CNC) machine. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include the single piece of the material comprises removing the first portion of material from the single piece of the material using a computer numerical control (CNC) machine since the use of removing material using CNC machines is conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claim 17, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the piston (30) is configured to fit within a casing (14b) of the wind instrument and is further configured to move translationally along a longitudinal axis of the casing (14b) when fit within the casing (14b). Regarding claim 20, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the wind instrument is a trumpet, a French horn, a tuba, a euphonium, a cornet, a flugelhorn, a mellophone, a trombone, a valve trombone, a baritone, a marching brass instrument, a sousaphone, a piccolo trumpet, or a novel valved brass instrument (paragraph 0001). Regarding claim 21, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses one or more mounting holes. Wasser does not disclose a method of drilling the mounting holes. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser to include drilling of the mounting holes since drilling is a method that is well known in the art. Regarding claim 22, Wasser et al (US20060219083) comprises a bottom surface that includes a recessed feature configured to receive a spring (see the recessed feature in figure 21). Regarding claim 35, Wasser and Brehm do not disclose the specific use of a centerless grinder. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device as disclosed in Wasser, the treated surface as disclosed in Brehm, and the use of a centerless grinder since the use of centerless grinder is conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claim 36, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the single piece of the material comprises a cylindrical rod of the material (see the cylindrical body in figure 6). Regarding claim 37, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses wherein the material comprises aluminum, an aluminum alloy, brass, a nickel-copper alloy, or stainless steel (see paragraph 0059). Regarding claim 38, Wasser et al (US20060219083) discloses that the use of CNC machining is conventional and well known in the art (see paragraph 0059).. Claims 23-29 and 32-34 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/21/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The indicated allowability of claims 4-5, 10, and 14-15 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered references. Rejections based on the newly cited reference are recited above. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY R LOCKETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2067. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIMBERLY R LOCKETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640126
Tri-Column Airlift Bass Stand
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640123
BUCKET TYPE DRUM SET
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626676
ELECTRIC GUITAR BODY-STRUCTURE AND ELECTRIC GUITAR
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626677
VALVE CASINGS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR VALVE-BASED MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626674
VIBRATION PLATE AND MUSICAL INSTRUMENT
1y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.8%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1177 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month