Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/144,213

Lithium-ion polymer liquid automotive battery

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
May 07, 2023
Examiner
LEE, DANIEL H.
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Regen Technologies Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
381 granted / 542 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 542 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The amendment filed March 8, 2026 has been entered. Claims 2-4 have been canceled by Applicant. Claims 1 and 5-10 are pending. Claim Objections The previous objections to claims 1 and 2 have been withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The previous 112 rejections have been withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 5-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duduta et al. (“Duduta”, US 2011/0274948 A1) in view of Roumi et al. (“Roumi”, US 2012/0077095 A1), Visco et al. (“Visco”, US 8,932,771 B2), and Lee et al. (“Lee”, US 9,843,034 B2). Regarding claim 1, Duduta discloses an electrochemical cell comprising at least one fluid comprising electrode active material that is flowable into and/or out of the electrode compartment in which the electrode active material is charged and/or discharged (abstract). Duduta teaches first and/or second electrode compartments can be arranged such that electrochemically active fluid is transported through the compartments to generate energy (via discharge) and/or recharge depleted electrode active material (via charging) ([0034]). Fig. 1A depicts the compartments separated into upper and lower compartments, which reads on the claimed upper and lower layers. Duduta teaches electrochemically active fluids can be transported into and/or out of electrode compartments using a transporting device, such as a pump, or any other conventional device for fluid transport ([0035]). Duduta teaches transporting through conduits ([0061]) by injection ([0043]). Duduta teaches the ion-exchange medium can comprise a membrane ([0139]). Duduta teaches the electrochemically active fluid (including electrode active material) may include lithium metal ([0079]), binders (i.e. polymer) ([0125]), nanoparticles ([0105]), and an electrolyte salt ([0125]) including lithium salt ([0139]). Duduta teaches fullerenic carbon including single-wall carbon nanotubes may be used as electrode active materials ([0083]) but does not expressly teach a graphene porous carbon rod electrode communicating with an external pure oxygen tank. However, Roumi discloses electrochemical energy storage systems and methods (title) and teaches rod electrodes ([0012]. Useful electrode materials include those used in electrochemical cells and include graphene, inter alia ([0013]). Roumi also teaches an oxygen containing fluid, such as oxygen gas, positioned in contact with one or more rod electrodes ([0014]). As provided in [0015] Roumi discloses pumping the oxygen which implies the oxygen comes from a source as the pump must access the material to reasonably pump it. The foregoing appears to read on the broadly claimed storage tank. In the event that this is found unpersuasive, the examiner notes that Visco explicitly teaches oxygen being stored in a tank (2:41-53) and the courts have held that (1) Combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results; and (2) Use of known technique to improve similar devices (methods, or products) in the same way are both matters of obviousness (MPEP 2143). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to use the graphene rod electrodes of Roumi (in contact with oxygen) in the electrochemical cells of Duduta to provide higher power/energy density batteries, as taught by Roumi ([0159]). Duduta and Roumi teach lithium metal, a binder, nanoparticles, and a lithium salt electrolyte, as disclosed above. Duduta teaches a concentration sufficiently high to allow for operation of the energy storage device at its intended level and teaches ionic conductivity between about 0.01 and about 10 mS/cm ([0029]), which overlaps the claimed range. Duduta and Roumi do not expressly teach polyacrylonitrile or the porous silicon nanoparticles. However, Lee teaches a porous silicon-based anode active material may improve life characteristics of the lithium secondary battery by efficiently controlling the volume expansion (16:7-14). Lee teaches a plurality of honeycomb-shaped pores on surfaces, or on surfaces and inside of the crystalline silicon particles (16:16-20), wherein a diameter of the honeycomb-shaped pores in a range of 10 nm to 2 microns (16:35-37). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to use the silicon particles of Lee in the electrochemical cell of Duduta as modified by Roumi to help control volume expansion and improve life characteristics (16:7-14), as taught by Lee. As to the polyacrylonitrile (PAN), PAN is extremely well known in the art as a binder. For example, Lee teaches various types of binder polymers for the active material, include polyacrylonitrile (10:58-67). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to use PAN as the binder in Duduta as modified by Roumi since it was known to be an effective polymer binder for active materials on electrodes (Lee, 10:51-67). Duduta teaches the fluid can be transported to a reservoir, where it can be stored for later use ([0066]) or held in a dedicated tank or other suitable enclosure ([0059]). Duduta teaches injection ([0043]) using pumps or any other conventional device for fluid transport ([0035]), which is considered to read on the claimed micropower circulation pump. Duduta teaches the electrochemically active fluid can be shuttled back and forth between electrode compartments for charging ([0066]), including a dedicated tank ([0059]). Regarding claim 5, the electrochemical cell of Duduta as modified by the graphene rod electrodes of Roumi would operate in the manner claimed to pass lithium ions through the membrane and react with oxygen ions emerging from the graphene rod electrode. Regarding claim 6, Duduta teaches the negative electrode current collector may comprise copper ([0102]). Duduta also teaches the positive electrode current collector may comprise copper ([0103]). Regarding claim 7, the electrochemical cell of Duduta as modified by the graphene rod electrodes of Roumi is capable of being filled with pure oxygen while being heated and maintained at a certain temperature. Further, Roumi teaches heat transfer rods in thermal communication with electrode arrays ([0027]). Regarding claims 8 and 9, Duduta teaches pumps and conduits as well as a tank and reservoirs to shuttle the active fluid back and forth (see discussion of claim 1 above). Duduta does not expressly teach discharging for recycling and performing a reduction reaction. However, Roumi teaches a step of transporting depleted semi-solid or condensed ion-storing material to a discharged composition storage receptacle for recycling or recharging ([0058]). Roumi also teaches a step of applying an opposing voltage difference to the flowable redox energy storage device and transporting discharged semi-solid or condensed liquid ion-storing redox composition into the electroactive zone to be charged ([0059]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to recycle discharged by products or to replenish recoverable materials to reduce the unnecessary use/expense of raw materials. Regarding claim 10, Duduta as modified by Roumi teach the lithium metal electrode and the graphene porous carbon rod electrode, as discussed above. One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate connecting an electrochemical cell to any load. Roumi teaches using the electrochemical conversion devices for passenger vehicles ([0002]), which include a motor. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but are not found persuasive. Applicant has incorporated claims 2-4 into claim 1. Applicant argues that charging by replacing the liquid, not by conventional charging process, is not taught in the prior art. However, Duduta teaches the fluid can be transported to a reservoir, where it can be stored for later use ([0066]) or held in a dedicated tank or other suitable enclosure ([0059]). One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the same fluid could be charged and discharged, or alternatively, the fluid could be replaced with a charged fluid obtained from a different source. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H. LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-2548. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 5712705038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DANIEL H. LEE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1746 /DANIEL H LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 08, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12261143
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SUBSTRATE LAYERED BODY AND LAYERED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 25, 2025
Patent 12241004
MEMBRANES COMPRISING A THERMALLY CURED ADHESIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 04, 2025
Patent 12215254
Honeycomb Core Splice Adhesive with Improved Fire Retardancy
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 04, 2025
Patent 12213868
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FILAMENT WINDING OF BIOCOMPATIBLE THREADS AND MANUFACTURED FABRIC PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 04, 2025
Patent 12203597
TANK AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR TANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+25.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 542 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month