Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/144,796

Ankle Orthosis

Final Rejection §101§102§103§112
Filed
May 08, 2023
Priority
May 03, 2016 — provisional 62/331,315 +5 more
Examiner
HAWTHORNE, OPHELIA ALTHEA
Art Unit
3786
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Icarus Medical LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
932 granted / 1295 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1336
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1295 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the flexible or semi-flexible hinge describe in claims 1 and 7 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the status identifier for claim 2 has been changed to (withdrawn) however, in the election filed on 08/05/2025 claim 2 was included in the election. For the purpose of examination, the Office will consider claim 2 on the merits. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Section 33(a) of the America Invents Act reads as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism. Claims 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 and section 33(a) of the America Invents Act as being directed to or encompassing a human organism. See also Animals - Patentability, 1077 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 24 (April 21, 1987) (indicating that human organisms are excluded from the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101). As to claim 4, the limitation, “wherein the one or more tensioning element connects the proximal portion to the distal portion medially, laterally, or medially and laterally, relative the ankle of the wearer” and “wherein the one or more tensioning element is located anterior to the ankle of the wearer” positively recites part of the human body. As to claim 5, the limitation, “wherein one or more energy storage element connects the proximal portion to the distal portion medially, laterally, or medially and laterally, relative the ankle of the wearer” and “wherein the one or more energy storage element is located posterior to the ankle of the wearer” positively recites part of the human body. To obviate a rejection under 35 USC 101, the Office suggests that any claim that would include a human being, or part thereof, within its scope should use “configured to” or configured for” to define the metes and bounds of the claimed subject matter which is a permissible form of expression. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 6-10 are allowed. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record fail to show or make obvious the claimed combinations of elements particularly the limitations as set forth in independent claims 1 and 7 and dependent claims 2-3, 6 and 8-10 which recite features not taught or suggested by the prior art of record which fails to disclose or fairly suggest one or more flexible or semi-flexible hinge rotatably connecting the proximal portion and the distal portion, and configured to be medially, laterally, or medially and laterally, adjacent to the ankle of the wearer, wherein the one or more tensioning element traverses from the distal portion to the proximal portion across the one or more flexible or semi-flexible hinge; and wherein the one or more tensioning element generates a rotational force between the proximal portion and around two or more axes of rotation of the flexible or semi-flexible hinge to adjust tension across multiple axes of the ankle of the wearer while the orthotic device is being worn, in combination with the other elements (or steps) of the apparatus and method recited in the claims. Accordingly, a prima facie case of obviousness or an anticipation rejection cannot be established with respect to the claimed subject matter as set forth in claims 1 and 7. Claims 2-3, 6 and 8-10 are allowed insofar as they depend from the allowed base claims 1 and 7. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 1-4, filed 03/10/2026, with respect to claims 1-2 and 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 3-5 and 7-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of claims of 1, 3-10 has been withdrawn. Claims 1-6 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph have been withdrawn in view of amendments to aforementioned claims. The objection to claim 1 have been withdrawn in view of the amendment to claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OPHELIA ALTHEA HAWTHORNE whose telephone number is (571)270-3860. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM-5:00 PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alireza Nia can be reached at 5712703076. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OPHELIA A HAWTHORNE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §103
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679936
RARE-EARTH CATALYSED POLYISOPRENE ARTICLES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661272
PATCH FOR FEMALE GENITAL AREA
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653710
Hip Flexion Contracture Therapeutic Medical Device
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648867
GARMENT FOR STABILIZING A HUMAN ANATOMICAL JOINT
6y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648839
WEARABLE PERINEUM LEAKAGE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1295 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month