Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/145,066

TRANSISTOR PIN ALIGNMENT ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Examiner
TRINH, MINH N
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Garrett Transportation I Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1286 granted / 1499 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1547
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1499 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (claims 1-10) in the reply filed on 8/14/25 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that no serious burden on the examiner exists in examining claims of groups I-III inventions together or the restriction as to Groups II and (I/III) are process versus apparatus. This is not found persuasive because Group II invention directed to a method and Group I/III directed to an apparatus and the patentability of a method invention does not depend on the apparatus. Since, the apparatus as claimed can be used to practice another and materially different process. (see MPEP § 806.05(e, j)). In this case the apparatus of Invention can be used to practice another and materially different process other than invention II. Further, a single search for a number of distinction (3) inventions would not be made by a single search. Moreover, if the number of (3) inventions were searched concurrently the search would be burdensome because examination and search burden for these patentably distinct (3) inventions due to their mutually exclusive characteristics. The (3) inventions require a different field of search (e.g., searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries); and/or the prior art applicable to one invention (method) would not likely be applicable to another invention; and/or the invention are likely to raise different non-prior art issues under 35 U.S.C. 101 and/or 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. Therefore, the requirement mailed on or about 7/9/25 is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Applicants are required to cancel all non- elected invention II-III (claims 11-20) or take other appropriate action. Noted that a number of requirement election of species IA1-2-IB1-2are still existed in the elected Group I above but no burden at this point of time. However, it appears that claims 1-10 directed to the system as shown in Fig. 2 and claims will be rejected accordingly. An OA on the merits of claims 1-10 as follows: Drawings Since a number of difference embodiment existed in the Drawings, therefore, it is not known exactly which one of the embodiments related (e.g., Fig. 1 or Fig. 2 or Fig. 4, Fig or Fig. 6) is/are directed to the subject matters of the pending elected claims 1-10. Since, the Figs above represented a number distinctive inventions in terms of embodiments. Please be more specific. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The abstract should be updated to reflect an elected “system invention”. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claims 1-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: The preamble of the claim directed to “An electronic component alignment system comprising:” which is clearly directed to Fig. 2. However, claim also recited a number of outside elements /entities includes the electrical component (e.g., transistor), PCB and component wire pin) operatively associated with the system which made scope of the claim unclear. In formulate the rejection on the merit the Examiner presumes that the claims directed to a system as shown in details in Fig. 2 and claims will be rejected accordingly. It is unclear as to exactly what being referring to as “carrier portion” (claim 1, line 2) since specification discloses “a carrier “(130/230) therefore, it is not known exactly what portion of the carrier is being referring as a “carrier portion”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Since the scope of the claims directed to an “alignment system” therefore, only the structures that directed to the system is/are being considered on the rejection (see also claim objection above) because the outside associated elements (e.g., component pcb, wire pin) is/are not part of the claimed system. The recites “a carrier portion” (claim 1, line 2) should be updated to: --” a carrier”. whether or not the “an electronic component” (claim 1, line 2-3) as same as that as previous cited in claim 1, line 1? whether or not the claimed “a printed circuit board having a conical extraction including a second hole at an apex of the conical extraction” (claim 1, lines 7-9) is a part of the system? Since the scope of the claims clearly directed to a system (see claims 1-10, line 1). Therefore, the Examiner only relies on the system structure limitations (not the electric component) and claims will be rejected accordingly. whether or not “ a product enclosure”(claim 3, line 1-2) is a part of the system ? since it is clearly an outside product that associated with the system Scope of the claim directed to the system and claims 4-6 scope is directed to outside element which does not further limit the claimed system. Similar to claim 6 above applied to claims 7 -8. Claim 10 directed to material structures which do not seem to further limit the claimed system since no further inventive feature existed therefrom. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-8 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a1 as being anticipated by DE 102011086896A1 hereinafter the ‘986. In an alternative as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the DE 102011086896A1(hereinafter the ‘986). The ‘986 discloses the claimed electronic component alignment system comprising: a carrier portion 8 having a first side and a second side configured to receive an electronic component 4 on the first side, wherein the electronic component 4 includes a wire pin connection, and wherein the wire pin connection passes through a first hole in the carrier portion from the first side to the second side via a conical extrusion on the second side (see Fig. 1); a clamping portion 22/32 configured to clamp the wire pin connection to the first side (see Fig. 1, 4; and PNG media_image1.png 310 742 media_image1.png Greyscale a pin alignment portion 34/40 mechanically coupled to a printed circuit board 6 having a conical extraction including a second hole at an apex of the conical extraction wherein the second hole is aligned with a through hole in the printed circuit board (see Fig. 1). Therefore, the broadly claimed features above is/are met by the ‘986. Limitations of claims 2-3 as best understood is/are also met by the ‘986 (see Figs. 1 and 4). As applied to claims 4-5 refers to Fig. 1 where area 52 represented the component body affixed to the carrier 8, and further the clamping portion such as 22 is clamped the first segment of the wire pin 14 (see Fig. 1) As applied to claims 7-8 refer to translation provided filed on IDS dated 5/20/24 about page 3, (see second ¶ from the bottom] for teaching of solder connection of pin to PCB and that as in claim 8, respectively. As applied to claim 9, refers to Fig. 4 where the carrier included the funnel area to house the pin portion 16 which readable as a guide extraction and where the alignment portion 34/ 40 including a guide extrusion (see Fig. 2) PNG media_image2.png 615 653 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 4-6, 10 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the DE 102011086896A1 (hereinafter the ‘986). As applied to claim 4 appears to be met by the above since no further inventive features existed in claim 4 and it appears that component 4 of the reference as broadly as readable on the associated component as claimed by the instant invention. Since component is a transistor is not a part of the claimed system (structural form). Also, regarding As applied to claims 5-6, refer to component is a transistor and that as in claim 6 where the component is a MOSFET clearly not part of the system (see claim objection and 112 above). As applied to claim 7, similar to claim 5-6 above applied to claim 7, since PCB and the interconnection between the pin and PCB is not an inventive structure features because they directed to the outside associated with the system and are not a part of the system. As applied to claim 10, regarding the materials including material in claim above. Further, regarding claim 10, it would have been obvious to one having skill in the art to incorporate the claim limitation since it was known in the art that selecting a material from a host of group of available materials on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Claim(s) 1-3, 9 as best understood is/are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a1 as being anticipated by Jordan et al (US 4847449) Jordan et al discloses the claimed the claimed electronic component alignment system comprising: a carrier portion 16 having a first side and a second side configured to receive an electronic component 14 on the first side, wherein the electronic component 14 includes a wire pin connection, and wherein the wire pin connection passes through a first hole in the carrier portion from the first side to the second side via a conical extrusion on the second side (see Fig. 1); PNG media_image3.png 409 618 media_image3.png Greyscale a clamping portion 38 configured to clamp the wire pin connection to the first side (see Figs. 1,3-8); and PNG media_image4.png 353 533 media_image4.png Greyscale a pin alignment portion 136 mechanically coupled to a printed circuit board 18 having a conical extraction including a second hole at an apex of the conical extraction wherein the second hole is aligned with a through hole in the printed circuit board (see Fig. 5). Note that the phrase: ”configured to receive an electronic component 14 on the first side, wherein the electronic component 14 includes a wire pin connection, and wherein the wire pin connection passes through a first hole in the carrier portion from the first side to the second side via a conical extrusion on the second side” is intended used which does not further limit the claimed system. As applied to claims 2-3 as best understood is/are also met by the Jordan et al (see Fig. 5, 136) and limitation of claim 3 (see Fig. 2 where 10 representing the product enclosure and the attachment associated thereto). Claim 3 does not further limit the claimed system since the enclosure is an outside associated element which is not a part of the system. As applied to claim 9, refer to related embodiments (see Figs. 3, 4, which depicts the features such as wherein the carrier portion 16/32 further includes a guide extraction 36 and wherein the pin alignment portion includes a guide extrusion 42 for providing an initial alignment between the carrier portion and the pin alignment portion before the conical extrusion). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MINH N TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-4569. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH ~5:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MINH N TRINH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729 mt
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604397
A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A FORMED FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603395
BATTERY MODULE ASSEMBLY APPARATUS USING VISION AND ASSEMBLY METHOD USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603337
ADJUSTING METHOD OF NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION AND PRODUCING METHOD OF LITHIUM-ION SECONDARY BATTERY WITH REUSED ELECTRODE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603627
Method for Manufacturing Vibration Element
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597832
METHOD FOR LAMINATED CORE OF ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1499 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month