Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/145,840

DECOUPLING MIM CAPACITOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Examiner
BOATMAN, CASEY PAUL
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
52 granted / 64 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 64 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I drawn to claims 1-13 in the reply filed on December 29, 2025 is acknowledged. Claim Interpretation Examiner notes that a “dummy region” and “dummy gate region” cited in claims 5 and 12 respectfully are interpreted as regions of the device wherein no active gate is present. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the VBPR S/D metal". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner notes that claim 3 cites a VBPR S/D metal contact which is interpreted to correspond to VBPR1 shown in Fig. 18 of the instant application. Claim 9 cites that “the VBPR S/D metal contacts another portion of the at least two portions of the BSPR.” For examination purposes, “the VBPR S/D metal” is interpreted to be the metallization layer which includes the VPBR S/D metal contact cited in claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li (US 20220293513 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Li teaches a semiconductor device (400, shown fig. 4), comprising: a backside power rail (BSPR) (portions 446, 448 and 449, see [0061]); a source-drain (S/D) region (see S/D regions of transistor 460 annotated below) connected to the BSPR (shown Fig. 4 being electrically connected); and a metal-insulator-metal capacitor (MIMC) (450, see [0061]), wherein the BSPR directly connects to the MIMC by a MIMC via for backside power rail (VBPR) metal contact (see via directly connecting upper electrode 454 to backside power rail portions 446 and 449). PNG media_image1.png 669 1263 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the MIMC VBPR contact is connected to at least one electrode of the MIMC (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 3, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 2, wherein the source-drain region is connected to the BSPR by a VBPR S/D metal contact (shown in Fig. 4, see metal portions connected to BPR 475). Regarding Claim 4, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 3, wherein the source-drain region is directly connected to the BSPR by the VBPR S/D metal contact (shown Fig. 4 being in direct electrical connection). Regarding Claim 5, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 4, wherein the MIMC is in a dummy region (interpreted as a region of the device wherein no active gate is present) of the semiconductor device (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 6, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 5, further comprising: a back-side power distribution network (BSPDN) (470, a power management IC, see also [0058]) directly connected with the BSPR (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 7, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 6, further comprising: a middle-end-of-the-line (MOL) region (region vertically between the capacitors and transistors, shown Fig. 4) including a plurality of metal contacts (shown Fig. 4, see metallization under BPR portions 475), wherein at least one electrode (lower electrode 452) of the MIMC is directly coupled (interpreted as a direct electrical coupling) to at least one of the plurality of metal contacts of the MOL region (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 8, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 7, wherein the at least one MIMC electrode connected to the MIMC VBPR contact (upper electrode 454) is distinct from the at least one electrode of the MIMC connected the at least one of the plurality of metal contacts of the MOL region (lower electrode 452). Regarding Claim 9, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 6, wherein: the BSPR includes at least two portions (shown Fig. 4, corresponding to portions 446, 448 and 449); the MIMC VBPR contacts at least one of the at least two portions of the BSPR (shown in electrical contact in Fig. 4); and the VBPR S/D metal (interpreted as being the same metal layer as the VBPR S/D contact cited in claim 3) contacts another portion of the at least two portions of the BSPR (shown, wherein a separate VPBR S/D metal portion is shown contact a second portion 449 in Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 10, Li teaches a semiconductor device (400, shown Fig. 4), comprising: a back-end-of-the-line (BEOL) region (440); a front-end-of-the-line (FEOL) region (420); a backside power distribution network (BSPDN) (470); and a metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitor (450) connected to both the BEOL region and the BSPDN region (shown Fig. 4), wherein the MIM capacitor is directly connected to a via-buried-power-rail (VBPR) (446, 448 and 449) that in turn directly connects to the BSPDN (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 11, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 10, wherein the MIM capacitor is located in a distinct region (region 440, shown Fig. 4) of the semiconductor device than a region of the semiconductor device including one or more transistor devices (region 420, shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 12, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 10, wherein the MIM capacitor is located in a dummy gate region (region 440 comprises no active gates) of the semiconductor device (shown Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 13, Li teaches the semiconductor device of claim 12, wherein the dummy gate region does not include a dummy gate. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: LaJoie (US 20210408002 A1) teaches a device comprising a transistor layer (1004) and a capacitor layer (1000), wherein an electrode of a MIM capacitor is electrically coupled to a drain electrode of a transistor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASEY PAUL BOATMAN whose telephone number is (703)756-4778. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM - 5:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at (571)270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.P.B./Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /Britt Hanley/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588306
IMAGE SENSORS COMPRISING AN ARRAY OF INTERFERENCE FILTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568163
DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563796
EXTENDED LOWER SOURCE/DRAIN FOR STACKED FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563764
COMPLEMENTARY HIGH ELECTRON MOBILITY TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550404
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+15.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 64 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month