Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/147,623

TOF OPTICAL SENSING MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 28, 2022
Examiner
BOLDA, ERIC L
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Egis Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
881 granted / 1021 resolved
+34.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1049
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1021 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: the word “communicated” should be “communicating”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 7-8, and 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tsai et al. (US 2022/0293813). With regard to claim 1, Tsai discloses a TOF optical sensing module (para. [0039), comprising (see Fig. 3 reproduced below, and paras. [0040] & [0051]): a substrate (20); a cap comprising a body (302), and a transmitting window (70), a receiving window (80), a partition structure (331) and at least one protruding structure (333) all connected to the body, wherein the body and the substrate together define a chamber, the body has a lower surface facing the substrate and the chamber, and the at least one protruding structure protrudes from the lower surface toward the chamber; and a transceiving unit provided in the chamber, wherein the partition structure is disposed between the lower surface and the substrate to divide the chamber into an emitting chamber (31) and a receiving chamber (32) respectively corresponding to the transmitting window (70) and the receiving window (80), in conjunction with the transceiving unit; the transceiving unit is configured to emit detection light (from transmitter 40) from the emitting chamber and receive sensing light (at sensor 60) in the receiving chamber through the receiving window; and each of the at least one protruding structure (333) is disposed in the emitting chamber to reflect and/or absorb the detection light traveling in the emitting chamber towards the receiving chamber. PNG media_image1.png 362 520 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 7, the protruding structure (333) is in contact with the partition structure (331). With regard to claim 8, the transceiving unit comprising at least one reference pixel (60), and at least one part ( right part of 333) of the protruding structure is disposed between the reference pixel and the transmitting window (70). With regard to claim 10, the transceiving unit comprises: a reference pixel (60) disposed in the emitting chamber (31), between the partition structure and the transmitting window (70); A sensing pixel (50) disposed in the receiving chamber and below the receiving window (80), and A light-emitting unit (40) disposed in the emitting chamber and below the transmitting window (70), irradiates a target object above the cap, then is reflected from the target object, and then travels through the receiving window and is received by the sensing pixel (50) as sensing light [0040]; and another portion of the detection light is reflected and/or absorbed in the emitting chamber by the at least one protruding structure (part of the inner surface of upper cap portion, [0042], and then is at least partially received by the reference pixel (60) as reference light. With regard to claim 11, the emitting chamber (31) and the receiving chamber (32) do not (optically) communicate with each other (no stray light between cavities, para. [0048]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al. (US 2022/0293813). Tsai does not specifically disclose that all of the at least one protruding structure is disposed between the reference pixel and the transmitting window. However, the exact position of the protruding structure is a design choice based on the intensity and pulse characteristics of the transmitted light, and consideration of how much light is to be detected at the reference sensor. It would have been well within the skill of an artisan, e. g. an optical engineer, before the effective filing date of the application to configure all of the protruding structure between the reference pixel and the transmitting window, to reduce the light intensity to the reference sensor by reflection from the protruding structure (para. [0042]). Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Chen (US 2020/0007668). Tsai does not disclose, but Chen teaches in the same field of endeavor, that a barrier between an emitter and a receiver of a TOF optical sensing module, has at least one surface provided with a coating layer for absorbing the detection light (Fig. 4B, and para [0051], baffle (6) between emitter (21) and sensor (22) is a protrusion coated with an absorbing material configured to absorb the first signal emitted by the laser). The absorbing coating on the baffle further reduces background noise from the emitter being received by the receiver (para. [0052]). Therefore, one skilled in the art, e. g. an optical engineer, would have been motivated before the effective filing date of the application, by the teaching of Chen to provide a coating layer for absorbing the detection light on the protrusion in the TOF optical sensing module of Tsai et al. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on Dec. 28, 2022 has been considered by the Examiner. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Campbell, Ho, Chou, and Droz disclose laser range-finders with integrated transmitter and receiver structures. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to ERIC L BOLDA whose telephone number is 571-272-8104. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 8:30am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, YUQING XIAO can be reached on 571-270-3603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC L BOLDA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603468
Optical amplifier failure prediction using machine learning
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597752
GAIN EQUALIZATION IN C+L ERBIUM-DOPED FIBER AMPLIFIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592535
Multi-wavelength Sources based on Parametric Amplification
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585020
DETECTION DEVICE WITH AT LEAST ONE SENSOR DEVICE, AN ANALYSIS DEVICE, A LIGHT SOURCE, AND A CARRIER MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580658
OPTICAL RECEPTION DEVICE AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1021 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month