Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/148,645

MICRO DEVICE WITH SHEAR PAD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 30, 2022
Examiner
HOSSAIN, KAZI S
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
485 granted / 610 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
644
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
66.6%
+26.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Elections/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group II (Claims 16-20) without traversed in the reply filed on 01/22/2026 is acknowledged. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, an opening exposing the first bond pad and a portion adjacent the opening having a thickness between 3 to 5µm thick as claimed in claim 1 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121 (d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as "amended." If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either "Replacement Sheet" or "New Sheet" pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-20 are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over by Lee (US 20060263727 A1). Regarding Claim 16: Lee teaches that a device comprising: a first patterned conductive layer (200, Fig. 12; para 0091-0105) on a substrate (110, Figs. 12-13), the first patterned conductive layer including a first bond pad (159), 212; a dielectric layer (122) on the first patterned conductive layer, wherein the dielectric layer an opening (121) exposing the first bond pad and a portion adjacent the opening having a thickness (thickness of 132 in Fig. 3), and a second patterned conductive layer (300) on the dielectric layer. Lee does not explicitly teach that a portion adjacent the opening having a thickness between 3 to 5 µm thick. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have a portion adjacent the opening having a thickness between 3 to 5 µm thick, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art to facilitate good magnetic shielding effect. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. MPEP 2144.05 (II-A). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have a portion adjacent the opening having a thickness between 3 to 5 µm thick as claimed to meet design requirements for certain application for successful device operation. Regarding Claim 17: As applied to claim 16, Lee teaches that the dielectric layer includes: a first dielectric layer (122); an etch assist layer (132) on the first dielectric layer; and a second dielectric layer (122) on the etch assist layer. Regarding Claim 18: As applied to claim 17, Lee teaches that the first dielectric layer and the second dielectric layer are silicon dioxide, and the etch assist layer includes silicon oxynitride (see para 0046). Regarding Claim 19: As applied to claim 17, Lee teaches that the first patterned conductive layer includes a first coil (200), the second patterned conductive layer includes a second coil (300), and the first coil and the second coil are aligned with each other (construed from Fig. 13). Regarding Claim 20: As applied to claim 16, Lee teaches that a ball bond (143, Fig. 13) bonded to the first bond pad. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kazi Hossain whose telephone number is 571-272-8182. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from Monday to Thursday 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https:/www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAZI HOSSAIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2837 /SHAWKI S ISMAIL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603220
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597548
INDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586699
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586706
COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580118
MULTI-LAYER INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month