Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/148,878

ORGANIC COMPOUND, LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, AND DISPLAY PANEL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 30, 2022
Priority
Dec 12, 2022 — CN 202211598613.0
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1025 granted / 1212 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1251
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.7%
+38.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1212 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 2 and 12 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 2 and 12, the numbering sequence of the compounds is out of order. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hatakeyama (WO 2022185897 A1). Regarding Claims 1-5, 11, Hatakeyama teaches a material represented by Int-v-10123 (page 261): PNG media_image1.png 160 238 media_image1.png Greyscale Int-v-10123 reads on applicants’ Formula 1 and 2 wherein Ar1 = H; Ar2-Ar6 = phenyl; Z = NR3, R3 = phenyl; X = NR4, R4 = heteroaromatic (amino substituted carbazole) (per claims 1-2, 11) Int-v-10123 reads on applicants’ Formula 12 wherein Ar1 = H; Ar2-Ar9 = phenyl; Z = NR3, R3 = phenyl; Y = NR7, R7 = heteroaromatic (amino substituted carbazole) (per claims 3-5). Allowable Subject Matter I Claims 6-10, 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record fails to show the limitations of the above claims. The closest prior art as exemplified by Hatakeyama teaches a material represented by Int-v-10123 (page 261): PNG media_image1.png 160 238 media_image1.png Greyscale Int-v-10123 fails to show the required ring system of Formulas 13 and 14 of claims 6-10 or the compounds of claim 12. Allowable Subject Matter II The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter as applicant claims the light emitting element of claim 13 and the display device of claim 20. A search of the prior art did not show the claimed invention. The closest prior art as exemplified by Hatakeyama teaches a material represented by Int-v-10123 (page 261): PNG media_image1.png 160 238 media_image1.png Greyscale Int-v-10123 while reading applicants’ Formula 1 is taught by Hatakeyama as an intermediate in route to a final product which is used in an OLED as shown below: PNG media_image2.png 182 608 media_image2.png Greyscale From the above reaction scheme (page 261) it can clearly be seen the Int-v-10123 is not the final product used in the OLED as required by independent claims 13 and 20. The final product used by Hatakeyama in OLEDs has a different parent ring system than applicants’ Formula 1. Hatakeyama fails to teach, suggest or to offer any guidance to render obvious using intermediate in an OLED or display device as required by independent claims 13 and 20. Claims 13-20 allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637482
COMPOUND AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
4y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635330
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630576
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, AND THE ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND
3y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630575
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628493
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1212 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month