Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/151,065

COIL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 06, 2023
Priority
Jan 14, 2022 — JP 2022-004580
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1031 granted / 1263 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1310
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1263 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 7, Figure 11 in the reply filed on 11/24/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that claims 1, 5 and 8-12 readable on Species 7, Figure 7. This is not found persuasive because claims 8-12 depend on non-elected claims 2-4 and 6-7. Claims 1 and 5 will be examined herewith. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masahiko [JP 11-297531A] in view of Otsubo et al. [US 2016/0372246 A1]. Regarding claim 1, Masahiko discloses a coil component [60, figure 13] comprising: - a body [11] having external terminals [13a, 13b] mounted at both ends thereof; and - a coil structure [12] arranged inside the body, wherein the coil structure including a coil portion and extended conductors or end portions [61, 62] connected to the coil portion, wherein the coil portions electrically connected to the external electrodes. Masahiko further discloses the extended conductors [61, 62] formed of a plurality of via conductors [figure 13]. Masahiko disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific of the coil portion and the arrangement of the coil portion relative to the extended portions. Otsubo et al. discloses a coil component [1, or 10, Figures 1, 16-17 and 37] comprising: - a magnetic body [2]; - a coil embedded in the magnetic body [figure 1]; - an external electrode [5] on at least a bottom surface of the magnetic body and electrically connected to the coil; and - an extended conductor [3] in which one end [3] is connected to the coil inside the magnetic body and another end [3] is connected to the external electrode on the bottom surface of the magnetic body, the external electrode including a first external electrode [5, figures 16-17] and a second external electrode [5, figures 16-17], the extended conductor including a first extended conductor having one end connected to a start end of the coil and another end connected to the first external electrode, and a second extended conductor having one end connected to a terminal end of the coil and another end connected to the second external electrode [figures 1 and 16-17], the coil being present only on a plane including the start end and the terminal end, the coil and the first extended conductor not overlapping each other except for a portion where the coil and the first extended conductor are connected [figure 1], when a surface on which the coil is present is viewed from a direction extending from the one end to the other end of the first extended conductor, and the coil and the second extended conductor not overlapping each other except for a portion where the coil and the second extended conductor are connected, when the surface on which the coil is present is viewed from a direction extending from the one end to the other end of the second extended conductor [figures 1 and 16-17]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the coil portion and extended portions arrangement of Otsubo et al. in Masahiko for the purpose of facilitating different surface mounting and/or arrangement. Regarding claim 5, Otsubo et al. discloses the coil includes a plurality of coils which are inside the magnetic body [figure 37]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749613
INDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744149
WOUND CORE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738404
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731723
INTEGRATED BOTTOM SUNKEN SURFACE MOUNT AND/OR SWING INDUCTOR AND FABRICATION METHODS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725726
INDUCTOR
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1263 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month