Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/152,875

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL AND PBCH BLOCK SEARCH INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 11, 2023
Priority
Jul 20, 2020 — CN 202010700401.3 +1 more
Examiner
NAWAZ, ASAD M
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
53 granted / 107 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 107 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 18/152,875 filed on 01/11/2023 is presented for examination by the examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claim 11 is amended. Claim 12-19 are cancelled. Claims 1-11 and 20-28 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 11, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see Remarks, filed on 03/11/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1-11 and 20-28 have been considered but are not persuasive because the arguments do not apply to the references as used in the current rejection. Examiner provides a new ground(s) of rejections to address Applicant’s arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-11 and 20-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over in view of Wang et al. (Pub. No. US 2023/0140323 A1 hereinafter Wang) in view of Nam et al. (Pub. No. US 2019/0098590 A1 hereinafter Nam), and further in view of Sang et al. (Pub. No. US 2021/0176656 A1 hereinafter Sang). Regarding claim 1, Wang teaches “a method for determining synchronization signal and PBCH block (SSB) search information, performed by a terminal” as [(Para. 0062), The UE could be configured with periodic reference signal from the serving cell, e.g., CSI-RS or SS/PBCH Block (SSB), for beam failure detection.] “and comprising: obtaining target information comprising frequency domain information of SSB, the frequency domain information of SSB comprising a subcarrier spacing (SCS) of SSB;” [(Para. 0169-0171), Example 10 may include a method of a UE, the method comprising: receiving configuration information for a pathloss reference signal associated with an uplink signal to be transmitted using inter-cell multi-transmission-reception point (TRP) operation, wherein the configuration information includes a cell ID and a frequency domain of an SSB associated with the pathloss reference signal; and measuring or causing measurement of a pathloss on the pathloss reference signal based on the configuration information.] “and determining related information of SSB search based on the target information;” [(Para. 0045), In 5G NR Rel-15/Rel-16, SS/PBCH Block (SSB) which contains synchronization signals is transmitted periodically and could be used for beam management purpose.]. However, Wang does not specifically disclose wherein: the related information of SSB search comprises at least one of: parameter information of SSB; or a parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection; the parameter information of SSB comprises an SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection; the parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection comprises at least one of: a scaling value of a parameter required for cell reselection; or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection; the determining related information of SSB search based on the target information comprises determining, based on the SCS of SSB, at least one of following: the SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection; the scaling value of the parameter required for cell reselection; or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection. In an analogous art, Nam teaches “wherein: the related information of SSB search comprises at least one of: parameter information of SSB; or a parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection;” as [(Para. 0155), SSB periodicity] “the parameter information of SSB comprises an SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection;” [(Para. 0155), When the full SSBs are mapped (according to the value of L), up to 5 msec duration is occupied. Hence, a common offset value, oRMSI, that can always be used for TDM mapping is the slot number corresponding to 5 msec. If mapping of both SSBs and RMSIs in a same half-frame is desired, the slot number corresponding to 2 or 3 msec in the RMSI numerology can also be considered to be signaled. This second number may be necessary for 5 msec SSB periodicity and TDM is desired by the network. Similarly, the slot number corresponding to 7 or 8 msec in the RMSI numerology can also be considered. … (Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx.] “the determining related information of SSB search based on the target information comprises determining, based on the SCS of SSB, at least one of following: the SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection” [(Para. 0155), When the full SSBs are mapped (according to the value of L), up to 5 msec duration is occupied. Hence, a common offset value, oRMSI, that can always be used for TDM mapping is the slot number corresponding to 5 msec. If mapping of both SSBs and RMSIs in a same half-frame is desired, the slot number corresponding to 2 or 3 msec in the RMSI numerology can also be considered to be signaled. This second number may be necessary for 5 msec SSB periodicity and TDM is desired by the network. Similarly, the slot number corresponding to 7 or 8 msec in the RMSI numerology can also be considered.]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings as in Wang to provide an effective technique as taught by Nam to configuring control resource set for common and/or specific control information in next generation wireless communication systems to provide flexibility to support various applications meeting part on a use case basis [Nam: Para. 0002-0003]. However, the combination of Wang and Nam does not specifically disclose the parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection comprises at least one of: a scaling value of a parameter required for cell reselection; or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection; the determining related information of SSB search based on the target information comprises determining, based on the SCS of SSB, at least one of following: the SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection; the scaling value of the parameter required for cell reselection; or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection. In an analogous art, Sang teaches “the parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection” [(Para. 0293), does a UE camping on a CD-SSB see only the initial BWP during cell reselection (based on SIB1˜SIB3) … (Para. 0175), The UE shall only perform cell reselection evaluation] “comprises at least one of: a scaling value of a parameter required for cell reselection;” [(Para. 0054), scale the mobility measurements in accordance with at least one BWP parameter] “or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection;” [(Para. 0328), scaling is performed using RSRP's BW on the RSRP threshold for cell reselection, with the BWP's BW being used to differentiate] “the determining related information of SSB search based on the target information comprises determining, based on the SCS of SSB, at least one of following: the scaling value of the parameter required for cell reselection; or whether the terminal performs scaling on the parameter required for cell reselection during cell reselection” [(Para. 0133), The parameters to construct a BWP include: numerology (i.e., subcarrier spacing, cyclic prefix (CP), symbol duration) … (Para. 0054), scale the mobility measurements in accordance with at least one BWP parameter]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings as in Wang and Nam to provide an effective technique as taught by Sang for supporting measurements and mobility in a wireless communications system to support larger numbers of users and to meet the ever-increasing demand for greater data rates [Sang: Para. 0002-0003]. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the frequency domain information of SSB further comprises: a frequency range in which a search frequency of SSB falls; or the related information of SSB search further comprises: parameter information of synchronization signal and PBCH block measurement timing configuration (SMTC)” as [(Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx. For the minimum capability UEs, the intra-frequency SMTC duration may be regarded as measurement gap, similarly to the legacy inter-frequency case.]. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the parameter information of SSB further comprises: configured parameter information of SSB; or the parameter information of SMTC comprises at least one of: an SMTC value assumed when the terminal performs SSB measurement; or configured parameter information of SMTC” as [(Para. 0131), Periodicity: For the CSS, the periodicity does not need to be explicitly configured in PBCH. It is noted that for individual SIBx, this periodicity and SSB-common slot offset can be signalled or predefined in the spec.]. Regarding claim 4, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the configured parameter information of SMTC comprises at least one of an SMTC periodicity or an SMTC length.” as [(Para. 0057), During the SMTC window duration in which UE performs measurement on SS blocks based on one of the SSB composition indications, the UL transmissions should be overridden to ensure that the UE performs measurement (i.e., the UL transmissions need to be dropped or rate matched around on the indicated SSB OFDM symbols). On the other hand, outside the SMTC window duration in which UE receives UL/DL data, it could be allowed so that the UE transmits PUSCH/PUCCH on an SS block which is turned on by the indication (i.e., the SMTC configuration is overridden and transmission direction configuration is prioritized).]. Regarding claim 5, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein in a case that the target information is in a first state, the related information of SSB search further comprises at least one of: parameter information of SSB being first SSB parameter information; or a parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection being a first parameter;” as [(Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx.] “wherein that the target information is in the first state means that the target information satisfies at least one of: a search frequency of SSB being in a preset frequency range; or an SCS of the SSB being a first preset frequency value” [(Para. 0152), The SSB location in time domain is dependent upon the subcarrier spacing value. The shaded areas correspond to the SSB locations. For example, for 15 kHz SCS, OFDM symbols {2,3,4,5} and {8,9,10,11} are used for SSB mapping in a 14-symbol slot.]. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the first SSB parameter information comprises at least one of: an SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection being a first periodicity; or configured parameter information of SSB being first SSB configuration parameter information; or the related information of SSB search further comprises: parameter information of SMTC being first SMTC parameter information, and the first SMTC parameter information comprises at least one of: configured parameter information of SMTC being first SMTC configuration parameter information; or an SMTC value assumed when the terminal performs SSB measurement being a first numerical value; or in a case that the target information is in a second state, the related information of SSB search comprises at least one of: parameter information of SSB being second SSB parameter information; or a parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection being a second parameter; wherein the second state is a state different from the first state” as [(Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx.]. Regarding claim 7, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the second SSB parameter information comprises at least one of: an SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection being a second periodicity; or configured parameter information of SSB being second SSB configuration parameter information; or the related information of SSB search further comprises parameter information of SMTC being second SMTC parameter information, and the second SMTC parameter information comprises at least one of: configured parameter information of SMTC being second SMTC configuration parameter information; or an SMTC value assumed when the terminal performs SSB measurement being a second numerical value” as [(Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx.]. Regarding claim 8, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the target information further comprises indication signaling, and the indication signaling comprises at least one of following: the parameter information of SSB; parameter information of SMTC; or the parameter for the terminal to perform cell reselection;” as [(Para. 0123), For facilitating minimum capability UE's reception of SSBs and other initial access signals, it could be considered such that the intra-frequency SMTC configuration (i.e., periodicity, offset and duration) is provided in the early stage of initial access, e.g., RMSI or SIBx.] “wherein that the target information is in the first state means that the target information satisfies the indication signaling indicating that the search frequency of SSB is in a preset frequency range and that the SCS of SSB is a second preset frequency value” [(Para. 0152), The SSB location in time domain is dependent upon the subcarrier spacing value. The shaded areas correspond to the SSB locations. For example, for 15 kHz SCS, OFDM symbols {2,3,4,5} and {8,9,10,11} are used for SSB mapping in a 14-symbol slot.]. Regarding claim 9, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the parameter information of SSB comprises at least one of: the SSB periodicity assumed when the terminal performs initial cell selection; or configured parameter information of SSB; or the parameter information of SMTC comprises at least one of: an SMTC value assumed when the terminal performs SSB measurement; or configured parameter information of SMTC” as [(Para. 0131), Periodicity: For the CSS, the periodicity does not need to be explicitly configured in PBCH. It is noted that for individual SIBx, this periodicity and SSB-common slot offset can be signalled or predefined in the spec.]. Regarding claim 10, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the related information of SSB search further comprises: a first quantity corresponding to branches for performing the SSB search and a second quantity of SSB periodicities corresponding to the SSB search;” as [(Para. 0110), In some embodiments, PBCH indicates the following information for the CORESET: #1) frequency resources; #2) OFDM symbol numbers in each slot; and #3) RMSI slot timing e.g., in terms of slot offset and periodicity.] “and the method further comprises: performing SSB search in the second quantity of SSB periodicities based on the first quantity of branches” [(Para. 0110), In some embodiments, PBCH indicates the following information for the CORESET: #1) frequency resources; #2) OFDM symbol numbers in each slot; and #3) RMSI slot timing e.g., in terms of slot offset and periodicity.]. Regarding claim 11, the combination of Wang, Nam and Sang, specifically Nam teaches “wherein the method further comprises: determining a frame number or slot number corresponding to a physical downlink control channel (Type 0 PDCCH) for scheduling system information” as [(Para. 0005), determine a slot index n0 as a sum of an offset value and └i*M┘]. Regarding claim 20, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1, including “a communications device, comprising a processor, a memory,” as [(Wang: Para. 0149), FIG. 22 shows a diagrammatic representation of hardware resources 2200 including one or more processors (or processor cores) 2210, one or more memory/storage devices 2220] “and a program or instructions stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the program or the instructions,” [(Wang: Para. 0153), The instructions 2250 may reside, completely or partially, within at least one of the processors 2210 (e.g., within the processor’s cache memory), the memory/storage devices 2220, or any suitable combination thereof.] “when executed by the processor, causes the communications device to perform…” [(Wang: Para. 0149), FIG. 22 shows a diagrammatic representation of hardware resources 2200 including one or more processors (or processor cores) 2210, one or more memory/storage devices 2220]. Regarding claim 21, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 2. Regarding claim 22, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 3. Regarding claim 23, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 4. Regarding claim 24, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 5. Regarding claim 25, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 6. Regarding claim 26, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 7. Regarding claim 27, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 8. Regarding claim 28, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 9. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATALI N PASCUAL PEGUERO whose telephone number is (571)272-4691. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11AM-9PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASAD M NAWAZ can be reached at (571)272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATALI PASCUAL PEGUERO/Examiner, Art Unit 2463 /ASAD M NAWAZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641496
Methods and Apparatuses for Early Data Forwarding in Conditional Handover of a UE in Multi-Connectivity
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627623
SENDING GROUP MESSAGE TO TAGGED CONTACTS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621196
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12587879
LOCAL 5G MONITORING SYSTEM AND MEASUREMENT DATA PROVIDING METHOD THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587460
HEALTH MODEL FOR CLOUD SERVICE HEALTH MONITORING
1y 11m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+45.0%)
4y 8m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month