Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/153,209

DESICCANT ASSEMBLY FOR HUMIDITY CONTROL WITHIN A SENSOR HOUSING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 11, 2023
Priority
Aug 18, 2022 — provisional 63/399,099
Examiner
HOBSON, STEPHEN
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 617 resolved
At TC average
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
667
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
78.8%
+38.8% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 617 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-17 in the reply filed on 13 Nov. 2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gifford et al. US 2025/0099896 with a filing date of 14 Jan. 2022 (hereafter Gifford) Regarding claim 1, Gifford teaches a desiccant assembly (assembly comprising desiccant 50) within a sensor housing (¶93), comprising: a desiccant chamber (12) configured to hold a desiccant element (¶217); a transfer window (20) positioned between the desiccant chamber and a sensor chamber of the sensor housing (¶221); and a permeable membrane (30) covering the transfer window and configured to allow water vapor to transfer from the sensor chamber to the desiccant chamber (¶224, ¶231-232). Regarding claim 2, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches wherein the desiccant chamber comprises a pocket (pocket defining chamber 12) defined in a surface of a desiccant assembly body, the desiccant assembly body configured to separate the desiccant chamber from the sensor chamber (¶221-222). Regarding claim 3, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 2. Gifford further teaches wherein the pocket comprises a recess (recess comprising 20) defined in the surface of the desiccant assembly body, the recess comprising a transfer wall (21) within which the transfer window is defined. Regarding claim 4, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 3. Gifford further teaches wherein the recess is configured to receive the desiccant element (as shown in Figs 1). Regarding claim 5, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 3. Gifford further teaches wherein the desiccant element comprises an adhesive material adhered to at least one side of the transfer wall (¶224). Regarding claim 6, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches wherein the desiccant chamber is configured to hold at least one additional desiccant element (¶93). Regarding claim 7, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches at least one additional transfer window (window between adjacent legs 47) positioned between the desiccant chamber and the sensor chamber. Regarding claims 8-9, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches an access component (80) configured to isolate the desiccant chamber from an environment external to the sensor chamber (¶231), wherein the access component comprises a removable chamber cover (where the chamber cover 80 would be fully capable of being removed). Regarding claim 10, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches wherein the permeable membrane is configured so that a leak rate corresponding to a transfer of water vapor from the sensor chamber to the desiccant chamber causes prevention of condensation of water within the sensor chamber (¶105-108, ¶237, further where method of using the apparatus such as relative humidity in the sensor housing, temperature of the sensor housing, relative humidity in the chamber, and temperature of the chamber would be fully capable of preventing the condensation in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g)). Regarding claim 11, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches wherein the permeable membrane is configured to prevent a transfer of liquid water and particulate matter from the desiccant chamber to the sensor chamber (¶119-124, further where method of using the apparatus would be fully capable of preventing the transfer of liquid water and particulate matter in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g)). Regarding claim 12, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 11. Gifford further teaches wherein the permeable membrane comprises a material selected so that a leak rate corresponding to a transfer of water vapor from the sensor chamber to the desiccant chamber facilitates maintaining a relative humidity level within the sensor chamber at or below a humidity threshold (¶100-110, further where method of using the apparatus would be fully capable of the claimed leak rate in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g) where the permeable membrane is selected to dry the sensor housing ¶232). Regarding claim 13, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 11. Gifford further teaches wherein a set of dimensions of the transfer window is configured so that a leak rate corresponding to a transfer of water vapor from the sensor chamber to the desiccant chamber facilitates maintaining a relative humidity level within the sensor chamber at or below a humidity threshold (¶217, further where method of using the apparatus would be fully capable of the claimed leak rate in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g) where the transfer window is selected to dry the sensor housing ¶232). Regarding claims 14-15, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 1. Gifford further teaches wherein the permeable membrane comprises a polymer material, wherein the polymer material comprises expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (¶110-111). Regarding claim 16, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 14. Gifford further teaches wherein the desiccant element is removeable (where Figs 1 show the element is fully capable of being removed in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g)). Regarding claim 17, Gifford teaches all the limitations of claim 14. Gifford further teaches wherein the desiccant assembly is disposed within the sensor housing at a location that is selected so that a mass balance associated with the sensor housing facilitates a mechanical operation of a sensor within the sensor housing (¶221, further where method of using the apparatus would be fully capable of the mass balance in accordance with MPEP 2114, 2115, 2173.05(g)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN HOBSON whose telephone number is (571)272-9914. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at 571-270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN HOBSON/Examiner, Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12618576
AIR PURIFIER
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611626
METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR SEPARATING CARBON DIOXIDE FROM A FEED STREAM CONTAINING CARBON DIOXIDE
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611517
HUMIDIFIER RESERVOIR
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599871
EXHAUST GAS SCRUBBER WITH ENERGY INTEGRATION
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599868
Desulfurization of Carbon Dioxide-containing Gases
3y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+20.8%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 617 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month