Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/154,917

INTERMEDIATE, PREPARING METHOD THEREOF, AND METHOD OF PREPARING DRUG

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 16, 2023
Priority
Jan 27, 2022 — provisional 63/303,978 +1 more
Examiner
WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A
Art Unit
1692
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Heron Neutron Medical Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1417 granted / 1645 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -20% lift
Without
With
+-20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.3%
+21.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1645 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anderskewitz et al. (US 8,877,775). The reference discloses a process, wherein a compound of formula R8 and a compound of formula R9 are reacted in the presence of n-butyllithium as catalyst, in a tetrahydrofuran solvent, at a temperature of -78°C, to produce a compound of formula I-4.1 (col. 64 and 65). The compound disclosed as I-4.1 is a species of the compound of instant formula (1), wherein R1 and R2 are Br- and F-, and A is a bis-lactim ether. In the process disclosed, the compound R8 is a species of the compound of formula (9-1), wherein R3 and R4 are Br- and F-, and X is Br-. The compound R9 is a species of the compound of formula (9-2), wherein A3 forms an isopropyl group. The process disclosed by Anderskewitz et al., and the compound made, anticipates the instant claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 11, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Anderskewitz et al. The instant claims further limit the intermediate compound of the present invention to a compound that includes a structure of formula (2), wherein the compound has a boronic ester substituent for the R2 group of formula (1). The compound made in the process described in the rejection above has a Br- or F- substituent on the benzene ring. However, in the synthesis of a different intermediate, I-1.1.3, the reference teaches that a compound having a halogen on the benzene ring may be reacted with bis-pinacolato-diboron, in the presence of a palladium complex, to produce an intermediate wherein one of the halogens on the benzene ring is substituted with a boronic ester group (col. 44 to col. 45). The instant claims are rendered obvious by the reference teaching, because a person having ordinary skill in the art is taught how to substitute a halogen with a boronic ester group in making the intermediate compounds taught therein. Claim(s) 13-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Anderskewitz et al. (8,877,775) as applied to claims 4, 11, and 12 above, and further in view of CN 112979684. The instant claims are drawn to a method for preparing a drug by performing a fluorination reaction of the intermediate compound of claim 1 to produce a first compound. Further limitations include reacting the intermediate with K18F in the presence of a copper catalyst; and, reacting the first compound with a boronating agent to generate a second compound. Anderskewitz et al. do not expressly teach a preparing a drug by fluorinating the intermediate compound taught therein; however, the compounds taught by Anderskewitz et al. are intermediates in the production of compounds that have pharmacological use as inhibitors of Cathepsin C that may treat respiratory diseases. CN 112979684 teaches a process for producing 18F-BPA, a compound used along with boron neutron capture therapy for treating tumor cells, wherein the process comprises reacting an intermediate compound with 18F ions eluted with a potassium compound (resulting in K18F), in the presence of a copper catalyst, and then deprotecting the intermediate formed by removing amino and/or carboxyl groups (e.g., by hydrolysis), to produce 18F-BPA. The compound taught by CN 112979684 has a boronic acid pinacol ester group already present; however, a person having ordinary skill in the art could have used the process taught by Anderskewitz et al. for adding the boronic acid ester group to the compound. The instant claims are rendered obvious by the combined reference teaches, since a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been able to use the intermediate compounds taught by Anderskewitz et al. in a process for making a drug labeled with 18F by employing the process taught by CN112979684. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIKARL A WITHERSPOON whose telephone number is (571)272-0649. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-9pm IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIKARL A WITHERSPOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637402
CRESOL PREPARATION METHOD FOR INHIBITING PRODUCTION OF BYPRODUCT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629661
PHOTO CATALYTIC DEVICE FOR CONTINUOUS PROCESS FOR CO-CONVERSION OF CO2+H2O TO C1-OXYGENATES IN SUNLIGHT
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630491
PRODUCTION OF 2,2,4,4-TETRAMETHYLCYCLOBUTANE-1,3-DIOL FROM SECONDARY ALCOHOLS AND 2,2,4,4-TETRAMETHYLCYCLOBUTANEDIONE USING HOMOGENEOUS CATALYSTS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623986
SYNERGISTIC USE OF PHENOL PURIFICATION TRAIN IN PHENOL PRODUCTION UNIT FOR PROCESSING PHENOLIC WATER FROM BISPHENOL-A PRODUCTION UNIT
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623998
PROCESS FOR PREPARING A POLYISOCYANATE, POLYISOCYANATE, ITS USE AND POLYADDITION PRODUCTS PREPARED THEREFROM
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-20.4%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1645 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month