Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/155,333

DETACHABLE ENDOSCOPE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2023
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Taewoong Medical Co. Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
514 granted / 807 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
853
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 807 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The Amendment filed 2/10/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 3, 5-7 are pending in the application with claim 1 amended, claims 2, 4 cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3 and 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin et al. (KR 102161974 B1, hereinafter Shin) using US 2021/0068626 as an English equivalent. In regard to claim 1, Shin discloses a detachable endoscope (1, Fig. 1) comprising: an insertion unit (10) having one end that is configured to be inserted into a body (Fig. 1); an operation unit (20) coupled to another end of the insertion unit and having an operation module having a sprocket (Par. 48), the operation unit being configured to operate the one end of the insertion unit to perform a bending motion using the operation module (28,29), Fig. 1; and a detachment unit (1a) configured to detachably couple the operation unit and the insertion unit (Fig. 1), and lock the insertion unit in a coupled state simultaneously when the insertion unit is coupled with the operation unit (via coupling element (15)), Par. 44, Fig. 1), wherein the detachment unit includes: a first detachment module (200) disposed at one end of the operation unit and having an intermediate connection part (210,215, Fig. 3) to which a connection wire (21) configured to receive a force from the operation module is connected (Fig. 3, Par. 58); and a second detachment module (100) disposed at the another end of the insertion unit, configured to be detachably coupled to the first detachment module (Fig. 3, Par. 49), and having a module body (180) and an insertion end connection part (110,115, Fig. 3) connected to an operation wire (11), the operation wire being configured to transfer a force applied by the operation module to the one end of the insertion unit (Fig. 3, Par. 49), wherein the module body (180) of the second detachment module includes: an insertion end hollow that penetrates both ends of the module body (via interior hollow of the module body (180), Fig. 3); and a guide slit (185) extending in a first longitudinal direction on a surface of the module body (Fig. 3), wherein the insertion end connection part (110,115) includes an insertion end connection body (111) extending in a second longitudinal direction and configured to be inserted into the insertion end hollow (Fig. 3), wherein the insertion end connection body has a guide protruding member (113) extending from the insertion end connection body into the guide slit (185), the guide protruding member being configured to move along the guide slit to guide a rectilinear motion of the insertion end connection body (Fig. 3), wherein the intermediate connection part includes: an intermediate connection body (215) disposed rotatably around a third longitudinal direction (Par. 76, Figs. 8a-8c); an insertion groove defined concavely inward in the third longitudinal direction at one end of the intermediate connection body (via opening at the end of the connection body (215) best shown in Fig. 7), the insertion groove having a penetration part having a hole defined in a direction perpendicular to the third longitudinal direction (via slot shaped hooking holes within the connection body (215), Figs. 8a-8c), wherein the insertion end connection part further includes an engaging member (115) protruding outward in the second longitudinal direction from one end of the insertion end connection body (Figs. 8a-8c), the engaging member being configured to be locked in the insertion groove to couple the intermediate connection body and the insertion end connection body (via locking arrangement shown in Fig. 8c), wherein when the insertion unit and the operation unit are coupled together, the engaging member is configured to be inserted into the insertion groove, and the one end of the insertion end connection body is configured to contact the one end of the intermediate connection body (Fig. 8b illustrates contact between the insertion end connection body and the intermediate connection body), wherein a protruding distance of the engaging member is shorter than a depth of the insertion groove, a distal end of the engaging member and a base surface of the insertion groove are configured to be in a non-contact state at the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member (Fig. 8b illustrates the engaging member (i.e. hooking piece (115) is disposed within a groove of the coupling member and Par. 75 teaches the hooking pieces are disposed without any interferences within the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts, i.e. the hooking piece does not contact an interior surface of the coupling member). Shin does not expressly teach the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body are configured to be in contact to define a maximum insertion depth of the engaging member, such that a predetermined gap is defined between the distal end of the engaging member and the base surface of the insertion groove by the contact between the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body. Although Shin does not teach the insertion end connection body (111) contacting the intermediate connection body (215) to define a maximum insertion depth of the engaging member (115), Shin does teach the insertion end connection body (111) having a larger cross-sectional size than the opening of the intermediate connection body (215) as shown in Figs. 5, 8b such that the insertion end connection body (111) would contact the intermediate connection body and prevent further insertion therein. Additionally, Shin illustrates in Fig. 8b the insertion end connection body (111) is directly adjacent to the intermediate connection body (215) when the engaging member (115) has been inserted to the maximum insertion depth (i.e. standby state), but does not directly state the insertion end connection body and intermediate connection body contact. It would’ve been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to modify the insertion end connection body contacting the intermediate connection body to define the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member as a matter of design choice thereby providing a hard stop limiting the insertion depth of the engaging member within the intermediate connection member and ensuring the engaging member is properly positioned within the intermediate connection member to transition between the standby state and the hooked state. There being no unexpected results in modifying the insertion connecting member to contact the intermediate connection member to define the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member. In regard to claim 3, Shin teaches wherein the intermediate connection part further includes: a guide projection (213) configured to guide a rotational motion of the intermediate connection body (110), Figs. 8a-8c. In regard to claim 5, Shin teaches wherein when the insertion unit and the operation unit are coupled, the insertion end connection part is configured to press the intermediate connection part in a fourth longitudinal direction in a state in which the one end of an insertion end connection body is in contact with the one end of the intermediate connection body (Figs. 8a-8c). In regard to claim 6, Shin teaches wherein as the intermediate connection body rotates with the guide projection when the intermediate connection part is pressed by the insertion end connection part, the engaging member is configured to be inserted into the hole of the penetration part to be in an engaged state (Figs. 8a-8c). In regard to claim 7, Shin teaches wherein the intermediate connection part and the insertion end connection part are configured to be coupled to each other while being arranged on a same line along a fourth longitudinal direction to face each other and operate integrally based on manipulation of the operation module (Fig. 3). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/10/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: “First, Shin clearly fails to "expressly" disclose the claimed feature, "a protruding distance of the engaging member is shorter than a depth of the insertion groove" anywhere in the description of Shin including paragraph [0075]. The phrase, "without any interference," as described in paragraph [0075] of Shin, obviously does not "expressly" disclose "a protruding distance of the engaging member is shorter than a depth of the insertion groove." Also, FIG. 8b of Shin is shown in such perspective that fails to "expressly" show whether or not a distal end of the alleged engaging member 115, 125, 135, 145 touches on the base surface of the alleged insertion groove of the coupled members 215, 225, 235, 245. FIG. 8b of Shin, reproduced supra, does not even show the base surface of the alleged insertion groove of the coupled members 215, 225, 235, 245. “ The examiner disagrees since Fig. 8b illustrates the engaging member (i.e. hooking piece) disposed with a groove of the coupling member and Par. 75 teaches the hooking pieces are disposed without any interferences within the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts, i.e. the hooking piece does not contact an interior surface of the coupling member. The rest of Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 March 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 12, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599298
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING PHYSICAL CONTACT OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH PATIENT TISSUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588804
ENDOSCOPE BENDING SECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12543931
ENDOSCOPE CONTROL UNIT WITH BRAKING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543928
ELEVATOR FOR DIRECTING MEDICAL TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539019
A HANDLE FOR AN ENDOSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+17.9%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 807 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month