Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/155,333

DETACHABLE ENDOSCOPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2023
Priority
Jan 14, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0006184
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Taewoong Medical Co. Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 818 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 818 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The RCE filed 6/11/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 3, 6, 7 are pending in the application with claims 1 and 6 amended, claims 2, 4, 5 cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin et al. (KR 102161974 B1, hereinafter Shin) using US 2021/0068626 as an English equivalent. In regard to claim 1, Shin discloses a detachable endoscope (1, Fig. 1) comprising: an insertion unit (10) having one end that is configured to be inserted into a body (Fig. 1); an operation unit (20) coupled to another end of the insertion unit and having an operation module having a sprocket (Par. 48), the operation unit being configured to operate the one end of the insertion unit to perform a bending motion using the operation module (28,29), Fig. 1; a locking part (15) rotatably disposed at the another end of the insertion unit and configured to screw-couple the insertion unit and the operation unit to each other (Par. 44); a detachment unit (100, 200) configured to detachably couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other simultaneously (Fig. 3), wherein the detachment unit includes: a first detachment module (200) disposed at one end of the operation unit and having an intermediate connection part (210,215, Fig. 3) to which a connection wire (21) configured to receive a force from the operation module is connected (Fig. 3, Par. 58); and a second detachment module (100) disposed at the another end of the insertion unit, configured to be detachably coupled to the first detachment module (Fig. 3, Par. 49), and having a module body (180) and an insertion end connection part (110,115, Fig. 3) connected to an operation wire (11), the operation wire being configured to transfer a force from the operation module to the one end of the insertion unit (Fig. 3, Par. 49), wherein the module body (180) of the second detachment module includes: an insertion end hollow that penetrates both ends of the module body (via interior hollow of the module body (180), Fig. 3), wherein the insertion end connection part (110,115) includes an insertion end connection body (111) extending in a first longitudinal direction and configured to be inserted into the insertion end hollow (Fig. 3), wherein the intermediate connection part includes: an intermediate connection body (215) disposed rotatably around a second longitudinal direction (Par. 76, Figs. 8a-8c); an insertion groove defined concavely inward in the second longitudinal direction at one end of the intermediate connection body (via opening at the end of the connection body (215) best shown in Fig. 7), the insertion groove having a penetration part having a hole defined in a direction perpendicular to the second longitudinal direction (via slot shaped hooking holes within the connection body (215), Figs. 8a-8c), wherein the insertion end connection part further includes an engaging member (115) protruding outward in the first longitudinal direction from one end of the insertion end connection body (Figs. 8a-8c), wherein when the insertion unit and the operation unit are coupled together, the engaging member is configured to be inserted into the insertion groove, and the one end of the insertion end connection body is configured to contact the one end of the intermediate connection body (Fig. 8b illustrates contact between the insertion end connection body and the intermediate connection body), wherein a protruding distance of the engaging member is shorter than a depth of the insertion groove, a distal end of the engaging member and a base surface of the insertion groove are configured to be in a non-contact state at the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member (Fig. 8b illustrates the engaging member (i.e. hooking piece (115) is disposed within a groove of the coupling member and Par. 75 teaches the hooking pieces are disposed without any interferences within the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts, i.e. the hooking piece does not contact an interior surface of the coupling member), wherein when the locking part is rotated to screw-couple the insertion unit and the operation unit to each other, the one end of the insertion end connection body (111) is configured to press the one end of the intermediate connection body (215) in the second longitudinal direction to simultaneously lock and couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other (rotation of the locking part (15), Par. 44, causes the insertion end connection body (111) and intermediate connection body (215) to move towards each other and contact as shown in Fig. 7B while locking the insertion unit and operation unit together. As depicted in Fig. 7B, the engaging member (115) is held in a standby state in which is does contact the hollow interior of the intermediate connection body (215), however Fig. 7B depicted the insertion end connection body (111) contacting the intermediate connection body (215)). Shin does not expressly teach the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body are configured to be in contact to define a maximum insertion depth of the engaging member, such that a predetermined gap is defined between the distal end of the engaging member and the base surface of the insertion groove by the contact between the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body. Although Shin does not teach the insertion end connection body (111) contacting the intermediate connection body (215) to define a maximum insertion depth of the engaging member (115), Shin does teach the insertion end connection body (111) having a larger cross-sectional size than the opening of the intermediate connection body (215) as shown in Figs. 5, 8b such that the insertion end connection body (111) would contact the intermediate connection body and prevent further insertion therein. Additionally, Shin illustrates in Fig. 8b the insertion end connection body (111) is directly adjacent to the intermediate connection body (215) when the engaging member (115) has been inserted to the maximum insertion depth (i.e. standby state), but does not directly state the insertion end connection body and intermediate connection body contact. It would’ve been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to modify the insertion end connection body contacting the intermediate connection body to define the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member as a matter of design choice thereby providing a hard stop limiting the insertion depth of the engaging member within the intermediate connection member and ensuring the engaging member is properly positioned within the intermediate connection member to transition between the standby state and the hooked state. There being no unexpected results in modifying the insertion connecting member to contact the intermediate connection member to define the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member. In regard to claim 3, Shin teaches wherein the intermediate connection part further includes: a guide projection (213) configured to guide a rotational motion of the intermediate connection body (110), Figs. 8a-8c. In regard to claim 6, Shin teaches wherein as the intermediate connection body rotates with the guide projection when the intermediate connection part is pressed by the insertion end connection part, the engaging member is configured to be inserted into the hole of the penetration part to be in an engaged state (Figs. 8a-8c). In regard to claim 7, Shin teaches wherein the intermediate connection part and the insertion end connection part are configured to be coupled to each other while being arranged on a same line along a fourth longitudinal direction to face each other and operate integrally based on manipulation of the operation module (Fig. 3). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/11/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: “First, Applicant respectfully submits that the cited reference is completely silent with regards to the claimed feature, "a locking part rotatably disposed at the another end of the insertion unit and configured to screw-couple the insertion unit and the operation unit to each other; and a detachment unit configured to lock and detachably couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other simultaneously... wherein when the locking part is rotated to screw-couple the insertion unit and the operation unit to each other, the one end of the insertion end connection body is configured to press the one end of the intermediate connection body in the second longitudinal direction to simultaneously lock and couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other," as recited in amended claim 1. See FIG. 7C of the instant application, reproduced below as a non-limiting example, which may show that the one end of the insertion end connection body 341, 342, 343, 344 is configured to press the one end of the intermediate connection body E1, E2, E3, E4 in the second longitudinal direction (see the movement arrow in the Y direction) to simultaneously lock and couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other when the locking part is rotated to screw-couple the insertion unit and the operation unit to each other. See also paragraphs [0101]-[0102] as non- limiting examples. In contrast, Shin operates on a fundamentally different system. Shin teaches that when the insertion unit and the operation unit are coupled by the ring-shaped coupling element 15, the hooking pieces are disposed "without any interferences within the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts" to sit in a passive "standby state." See paragraph [0075] of Shin, reproduced below for the Examiner's convenience: In other words, in the state where the outer housingrs are mechanically connected to the external surfaces by a rink-shaped coupling element interposed between the front end of the operation unit and the rear end of the insertion unit, the hooking pieces of the first, second, third and fourth coupling members disposed at one ends of the first, second, third and fourth rack gears are positioned without any interferences in the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts of the first, second, third and fourth coupled members disposed at one ends of the first, second, third and fourth connecting shafts, so that the hooking pieces are in a standby state for the purpose of hooking connection. (emphasis added). See also FIG. 8B of Shin, reproduced below for the Examiner's convenience, which fails to show any movement or pressing by the contact between the operation unit and the insertion unit. To transition from this standby state to a locked state, Shin does not utilize a pressing contact between the connection bodies. Instead, a user must manually rotate an operation knob 28, 29. This extra manual manipulation applies an external force that pulls the connecting shaft toward the operation unit side. See paragraph [0076] of Shin. It is solely this pulling motion by the user that causes the guide pin to ride along the curved slit, rotating the operating bar to engage the hook.” The examiner disagrees since Shin teaches the coupling element (15) being a locking part and first and second detachment modules (100, 200) form the detachment unit. Par. 74-75 teach that when the outer housings are mechanically connected to each other via the ring-shaped coupling element (15), the intermediate connection body (215) and insertion end connection body (111) are placed in the configuration as shown in Fig. 8b in which the operation unit and insertion end are locked together and the intermediate connection body and insertion end connection body are coupled together. Applicant argues: “Second, Applicant respectfully submits that the cited reference is completely silent with regards to the claimed feature, "a protruding distance of the engaging member is shorter than a depth of the insertion groove, the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body are configured to be in contact to define a maximum insertion depth of the engaging member, a distal end of the engaging member and a base surface of the insertion groove are configured to be in a non-contact state at the maximum insertion depth of the engaging member, such that a predetermined gap is defined between the distal end of the engaging member and the base surface of the insertion groove by the contact between the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body," as recited in amended claim 1. Because Shin completely fails to disclose "the one end of the insertion end connection body configured to press the one end of the intermediate connection body in the second longitudinal direction to simultaneously lock and couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other," Shin has no reason to have "a protruding distance of the engaging member ... shorter than a depth of the insertion groove" and "the contact between the one end of the insertion end connection body and the one end of the intermediate connection body," which may safely transfer a longitudinal pressing force to simultaneously lock and couple the operation unit and the insertion unit to each other. See also Annotated FIG. 8B of Shin, reproduced below, which shows no contact between alleged insertion end connection body and the alleged intermediate connection body when the outer housings are mechanically connected to the external surfaces by a ring-shaped coupling element.” The examiner disagrees since Fig. 8b illustrates the engaging member (i.e. hooking piece) disposed with a groove of the coupling member and Par. 75 teaches the hooking pieces are disposed without any interferences within the internal spaces defined by the inner hollow parts, i.e. the hooking piece does not contact an interior surface of the coupling member. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 June 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Jan 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12690753
VIDEO ENDOSCOPE WITH FLEXIBLE TIP
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678038
Pannable Endoscope
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672766
Recording Medium, Method for Generating Learning Model, Image Processing Device, and Surgical Operation Assisting System
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12653391
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR REALTIME MONITORING AND CLEANING OF A LAPAROSCOPIC LENS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653388
CONNECTED MEDICAL DEVICES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+18.4%)
4y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 818 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month