Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/155,764

MAGNETIC COMPONENT AND TRANSFORMER

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 18, 2023
Examiner
LIAN, MANG TIN BIK
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
921 granted / 1312 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
82 currently pending
Career history
1394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species I, FIG. 1, claims 1-8 and 14-20 in the reply filed on 12/19/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there would be no serious burden to search and examine the application in its entirety. This is not found persuasive because the withdrawn claims, which are directed to different species, require further search and consideration, which is a serious burden on the examiner. Applicant withdraws claims 9-13. Claim 14 depends on withdrawn claim 13. Therefore, claim 14 is further withdrawn. In this Office action, claims 1-8 and 15-20 are examined, and claims 9-14 are withdrawn from consideration. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/18/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings received on01/18/2023 are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, the phrase "especially" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim 20 recites the limitation "the center portion" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chiyo et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2015/0145343 A1). With respect to claim 1, Chiyo et al., hereinafter referred to as “Chiyo,” teaches a magnetic component for a wireless charging transformer (FIGs. 1-4B, FIG. 3 is provided below for convenience), comprising: a magnetic core (combination of magnetic cores Ct, F1 Cca and Ccb, para. [0051]); at least one flat pre-wound major electrical coil (spiral “flat” coil Wt) disposed on the magnetic core (coil Wt is wound on core center portion Ct), and at least one minor electrical coil Wca and or Wcb wound around the magnetic core (coil Wca is wound on core leg Cca and coil Wcb is wound on core leg Ccb) (paras. [0042], [0044] and [0047]). PNG media_image1.png 412 448 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 1, wherein the major electrical coil has a shape substantially corresponding to the shape of the magnetic core (para. [0044]). With respect to claim 3, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 2, wherein the magnetic core comprises a plurality of leg portions Cca and Ccb, and a plurality of the minor electrical coils Wca and or Wcb are respectively wound around the leg portions (paras. [0045] and [0047]). With respect to claim 4, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 3, wherein the magnetic core further comprises a center portion Ct, and wherein the major electrical coil is disposed so as to surround the center portion of the magnetic core and the plurality of leg portions Cca and Ccb project from the center portion (paras. [0045] and [0047]). With respect to claim 5, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 4, wherein the center portion, the major electrical coil and the minor electrical coil do not overlap in plain view (para. [0047]). With respect to claim 15, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic component serves as a primary magnetic component for transmission of electrical power (para. [0036]). With respect to claim 16, Chiyo teaches a transformer for wireless charging, comprising at least one magnetic component (FIGs. 1-4B, FIG. 3), the magnetic component comprises: a magnetic core (combination of magnetic cores Ct, F1 Cca and Ccb, para. [0051]); at least one flat pre-wound major electrical coil (spiral “flat” coil Wt) disposed on the magnetic core, and at least one minor electrical coil Wca and or Wcb wound around the magnetic core (coil Wca is wound on core leg Cca and coil Wcb is wound on core leg Ccb) (paras. [0042], [0044] and [0047]). With respect to claim 17, Chiyo teaches the transformer according to claim 16, wherein the magnetic component serves as a primary magnetic component for transmission of electrical power (para. [0036]). With respect to claim 18, Chiyo teaches the transformer according to claim 16, wherein the major electrical coil has a shape substantially corresponding to the shape of the magnetic core (para. [0044]). With respect to claim 19, Chiyo teaches the transformer according to claim 18, wherein the magnetic core comprises a plurality of leg portions Cca and Ccb, and a plurality of the minor electrical coils Wca and Wcb are respectively wound around the leg portions (paras. [0045] and [0047]). With respect to claim 20, Chiyo teaches the transformer according to claim 18, wherein the center portion Ct, the major electrical coil and the minor electrical coil do not overlap in plain view (paras. [0045] and [0047]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chiyo, as applied to claim 4 above, in view of Sato (EP 2 966 655 A2). With respect to claim 6, Chiyo teaches the magnetic component according to claim 4. Chiyo does not expressly teach the magnetic core has a cross-potent-shape with a plurality of T-shaped leg portions projecting from the center portion, wherein each T-shaped leg portion comprises a first portion connected to a side of the center portion and a second portion as a crossbar, especially at the end of the first portion, and wherein the minor electrical coils are especially respectively wound around the first portion of the T-shaped leg portions. Best understood in view of 35 USC 112(b) rejection, Sato teaches a magnetic component (Fig. 1), wherein the magnetic core 2 has a cross-potent-shape with a plurality of T-shaped leg portions 21 projecting from the center portion 2s, wherein each T-shaped leg portion comprises a first portion 21a and 22a, connected to a side (outer side) of the center portion and a second portion 21b and 22b as a crossbar, especially at the end of the first portion, and wherein the minor electrical coils 5a are especially respectively wound around the first portion of the T-shaped leg portions (paras. [0023], [0027] and [0030]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the magnetic core and minor coils as taught by Sato to the magnetic component of Chiyo to provide additional minor coils to increase functionality. With respect to claim 7, Chiyo in view of Sato teaches the magnetic component according to claim 6, wherein a combined top surface area of all second portions of the T-shaped leg portions is X and a top surface area of the center portion is Y (para. [0023]). Chiyo in view of Sato does not expressly teach a ratio of X/Y is between and including 0.8 and 1.2. However, it would be within the skill of a person with ordinary skill in the art to provide the claimed ratio to provide the desired magnetic characteristics. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the claimed ratio to provide the desired magnetic saturation characteristics to meet design requirements. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chiyoin view of Sato, as applied to claim 6 above, and further in view of Mossay et al. (U.S. Patent No. 2,406,704. With respect to claim 8, Chiyo in view of Sato teaches the magnetic component according to claim 6, wherein the minor electrical coils are wound around the T-shaped leg portions between the center portion of the magnetic core and a portion of the major electrical coil and between the portion of the major electrical coil and the second portion of the T-shaped leg portions. Mossay et al., hereinafter referred to as “Mossay,” teaches a magnetic component (Fig. 1), wherein the minor electrical coils 8 are wound around the T-shaped leg portions 2 between the center portion 3 of the magnetic core and a portion of the major electrical coil 9 and between the portion of the major electrical coil and the second portion 1 of the T-shaped leg portions (col. 1, lines 41-53). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the minor and major coils structure as taught by Mossay to the magnetic component of Chiyo in view of Sato to provide the required magnetic coupling between the major and minor coils to meet design requirements. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANGTIN LIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 0800-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S. Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG TIN BIK LIAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603211
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597557
Dry High Voltage Instrument Transformer
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597554
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597556
TRANSFORMER DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586715
Coil Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month