Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/156,713

CHARGE PORT PILOT COMMUNICATION LINES WITH SWITCHES AND CONTROL OF SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 19, 2023
Examiner
GRANT, ROBERT J
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
595 granted / 780 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
804
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
82.9%
+42.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DeDona et al. (USPUB 2015/0097526). As to Claim 1, DeDona discloses a vehicle including: a charge port configured to receive a plug of electric vehicle supply equipment; a controller (Figure 1); and pilot and proximity communication lines including switches configured to establish a physical communication link between the charge port and controller when the switches are closed and to sever the link when the switches are open (Paragraphs 18 and 66). As to Claim 2, DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 1 further comprising a controller programmed to, responsive to occurrence of a predefined condition, command the switches to open for a predefined duration, and following expiration of the predefined duration, command the switches to close (Paragraph 69). As to Claim 3, DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 2, wherein the controller is further programmed to, following a predetermined number of cycles in which, for each of the cycles, the switches are opened and closed, preclude the switches from being opened (Paragraphs 66-67). As to Claim 4, DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 2, wherein the controller is further programmed to, following a predetermined number of cycles in which, for each of the cycles, the switches are opened and closed, preclude the switches from being closed (Paragraph 66-67). As to Claim 5. DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein controller is further programmed to generate an alert after the switches are closed (Paragraphs 71-72). As to Claim 6, DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 1, wherein the switches are relays (Paragraph 18). As to Claim 7, DeDona discloses the vehicle of claim 1 further comprising a traction battery configured to receive electric power via the charge port during a charge operation (Figure 1). As to Claim 8, DeDona discloses a charge system of a vehicle comprising: a controller programmed to, responsive to detecting occurrence of a predefined condition, command switches of pilot and proximity communication lines to open to sever a physical communication link between a charge port configured to receive a plug of electric vehicle supply equipment and the controller (Paragraphs 18 and 66). As to Claim 9, DeDona discloses the charge system of claim 8, wherein the predefined condition is a timeout or fault (Paragraph 69). As to Claim 10, DeDona discloses the charge system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further programmed to, following a predetermined period of time beginning with opening of the switches, command the switches to close (Paragraph 69). As to Claim 11, DeDona discloses the charge system of claim 10, wherein the controller is further programmed to, following a predetermined number of cycles in which, for each of the cycles, the switches are opened and closed, preclude the switches from being opened (Paragraphs 66-67). As to Claim 12, DeDona disclose the charge system of claim 10, wherein the controller is further programmed to, following a predetermined number of cycles in which, for each of the cycles, the switches are opened and closed, preclude the switches from being closed (Paragraphs 66-67). As to Claim 13, DeDona discloses the charge system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further programmed to generate an alert after the switches are opened (Paragraph 46). As to Claim 14, DeDona discloses the charge system of claim 8, wherein the switches are relays (Paragraph 18). As to Claim 15, DeDona discloses a method comprising: responsive to expiration of a predetermined period of time, closing a switch of a pilot communication line to reestablish a physical communication link between a charge port of a vehicle configured to receive a plug of electric vehicle supply equipment and a controller (Paragraphs 18 and 66). As to Claim 16, DeDona discloses the method of claim 15 further comprising, responsive to detecting occurrence of a predefined condition, opening the switch (Paragraph 46). As to Claim 17, DeDona discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the predefined condition is a timeout or fault (Paragraph 69). As to Claim 18, Dedona discloses the method of claim 16 further comprising generating an alert after the opening (Paragraph 46). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J GRANT whose telephone number is (571)270-5820. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at (571)272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT GRANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 13, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640573
BATTERY SHUNT IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640570
Charging System for Electric Vehicles
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633773
COSMETIC COMPACT WITH WIRELESS CHARGING
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633762
POWER DISTRIBUTION WITHIN RECONFIGURABLE BATTERY SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630044
BATTERY DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD, BATTERY DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month