Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/157,700

ORGANIC SULFONATE ELECTROLYTE ADDITIVES FOR ZINC BATTERIES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Examiner
HARRIS, MARY GRACE
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Octet Scientific Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
130 granted / 187 resolved
+4.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
230
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 187 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (Claims 1-9, 12-14, 20, 23-27, 31, 59, 67-68, and 70) in the reply filed on 02/23/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 69 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/23/2026. Claim Objections Claims 1, 14, and 23 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1: there are no spaces between the carbon notations and carbon group title (for example, claim 1 states “C3-C8cycloalkyl” instead of “C3-C8 cycloalkyl”). In the R1 limitations, the carbon notations for the alkoxy is C1-4 not C1-C4. Claim 14: “bond between Y and L” should be “bond between Y+ and L”. Claim 23: There is nothing indicating what PNG media_image1.png 48 42 media_image1.png Greyscale means (for example, like what is shown in claim 14). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Interpretation Claim 3 recites “optionally”. The Examiner notes MPEP 2173.05(h) II: “Another alternative format which requires some analysis before concluding whether or not the language is indefinite involves the use of the term "optionally." In Ex parte Cordova, 10 USPQ2d 1949 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1989) the language "containing A, B, and optionally C" was considered acceptable alternative language because there was no ambiguity as to which alternatives are covered by the claim. A similar holding was reached with regard to the term "optionally" in Ex parte Wu, 10 USPQ2d 2031 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1989).” The Examiner notes the recitation of optionally is clear in claim 3. Calculation Explanation In the rejections below, calculations for the weight percent of the electrolyte additives are done. The calculations for the weight percent of the compound/sulfonate anions are done by identifying the molar masses of each component, adding the molar masses of the anion and cation for the total ionic liquid molar mass, assume a 100g sample of the electrolyte, calculating the mass fraction of the sulfonate anion in the ionic liquid, and calculating the mass of the sulfonate anion in the grams of the electrolyte after water is removed from the 100g. For Example (taken from the rejection of claim 1 below). The ionic liquid electrolyte can contain water, an anion, and a cation. The anion can be MES and the cation can be tetramethylammonium. MES has a molar mass of approximately 195.24 g/mol. Tetramethylammonium has a molar mass of approximately 74.15 g/mol. In total, the ionic liquid from the mixture of both has a molar mass of 269.39 g/mol. The MES component accounts for 72.47 % of the total mass of the ionic liquid above. If water makes up 50 wt. % of the ionic liquid electrolyte, then the ionic liquid makes up the other 50 wt. %. If there are 100 g of the electrolyte, then 50g make up the part for the ionic liquid. The amount of MES in the ionic liquid electrolyte would be calculated by multiplying 50g by 0.7274. This calculates out to be 36.37 g, therefore, the weight percent of MES in the ionic liquid electrolyte would be approximately 36 wt %. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 12-14, 20, 23-26, 31, 59, 67-68, and 70 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wolfe et al (US 20120321967 A1, as given in the 06/06/2023 IDS). Regarding claim 1, Wolfe discloses an aqueous electrolyte composition comprising an electrolyte additive of Formula A, or a salt, zwitterion, cation, or anion thereof: PNG media_image2.png 112 122 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein: R is L-R1, L-Y+, C3-C8cycloalkyl, C3-C8heteroarylalkyl, or C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; L is a linear C1-C6alkylene, branched C1-C6alkylene, C3-C8cycloalkylene, or C3-C8heterocycloalkylene; wherein L is optionally substituted with one to four -OH; R1 is selected from -OH, C1-C4alkoxy, -C(O)OR2, -NR2C(O)R3, -NR4aR4b, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, -S(O)R5, C3-C8cycloalkyl, and C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; R2 and R3 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, C2-C6alkenyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; wherein R2 and R3 with the exception of hydrogen are independently optionally substituted with one to four R6; R4a and R4b are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen,C1-C6alkyl, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, -CR7R8R9, -CH2C(O)R10, cycloalkyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; or R4a and R4b are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6; R5 is -OH, C14alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl; R6, when present, is independently, in each instance, selected from C1-C6alkyl,-NH2, halogen, -OH, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, and -C(O)OR11; R7, R8, and R9 are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, -CH2C(O)R10, and hydroxyC1-C4alkyl; R10 is selected from -NH2, -OH, and C1-C4alkyl; R11 is selected from hydrogen and C1-C4alkyl; Y+ is selected from -N+R12R13R14, C3-C8heteroaryl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen, and C3-C8heterocycloalkyl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen; and R12, R13, and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, and -CR7R8R9;or R12 and R13 are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached to form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or 6-membered heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6 (electrolyte for zinc air battery including an ionic liquid, P33, 61; ionic liquid including the buffers described in P31 and shown in the figures following (Good’s buffers such as MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES and corresponding sulfonate ions (by removing the hydrogen from the OH of the compounds)); see entire disclosure and especially P31-32, 61); and wherein the electrolyte additive is present in the aqueous electrolyte at a concentration equal to, or greater than, 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to less than, or equal to, 40 wt % (water is present in the ionic liquid electrolyte at 0.1-50 wt %; see entire disclosure and especially P33, 35; P32 lists a number of suitable cations that are with the compounds above to form the ionic liquid (protic or aprotic); the cation used for the calculations below is selected as tetramethylammonium; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and MES and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, MES is present in approximately 36 wt. %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and HEPES and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, HEPES is present in approximately 38 wt. %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and HEPPS and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, HEPPS is present in approximately 39 wt. %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and MOPS and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, MOPS is present in approximately 37 wt %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and TAPS and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, TAPS is present in approximately 38 wt %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and TAPSO and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, TAPSO is present in approximately 39 wt %; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and TES and tetramethylammonium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, TES is present in approximately 38 wt %). Regarding claim 2, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula A is a compound of formula I: PNG media_image3.png 110 136 media_image3.png Greyscale (MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 3, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula A is a compound of formula IV: PNG media_image4.png 104 120 media_image4.png Greyscale and wherein the electrolyte composition optionally further comprises one or more anions selected from C1", Br, I', ClO₄; C₂HO₄; HSO4; HCO2, CICH₂CO₂; Cl₃CCO₂; HOCH₂CO₂; CF₃CO₂", H₂PO₄; CH₃SO₃", PhSO₃", p-CH₃-Ph-SO₃, PNG media_image5.png 78 76 media_image5.png Greyscale , PNG media_image6.png 86 138 media_image6.png Greyscale , and combinations thereof (MOPS; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 4, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula A is a compound of formula II: PNG media_image7.png 104 140 media_image7.png Greyscale (the sulfonate anion of MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES; Wolfe says the hydrogen can be removed from the OH in the compounds seen in P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 5, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula I is a compound of formula IIb or IIc: PNG media_image8.png 136 342 media_image8.png Greyscale (the battery is a zinc-air battery that would produce Zn2+ to coordinate with the sulfonate anion of MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES; Wolfe says the hydrogen can be removed from the OH in the compounds seen in P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 6, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula II further comprises a quaternary ammonium cation (the battery is a zinc-air battery that would produce Zn2+ to coordinate with the sulfonate anion of MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES). Regarding claim 7, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive has the following structure PNG media_image9.png 96 294 media_image9.png Greyscale (the sulfonate anion of MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES; Wolfe says the hydrogen can be removed from the OH in the compounds seen in P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 12, Wolfe discloses wherein compound of formula IV is a compound of formula III PNG media_image10.png 104 140 media_image10.png Greyscale (the sulfonate anion of MOPS; Wolfe says the hydrogen can be removed from the OH in the compounds seen in P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 13, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive has the following structure PNG media_image11.png 92 274 media_image11.png Greyscale (the sulfonate anion of MOPS; Wolfe says the hydrogen can be removed from the OH in the compounds seen in P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 14, Wolfe discloses wherein Y+ is PNG media_image12.png 70 104 media_image12.png Greyscale ; and where PNG media_image13.png 36 30 media_image13.png Greyscale indicates the bond between Y+ and L (HEPES, TAPS, TAPSO ,TES; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 20, Wolfe discloses wherein the compound of formula A is a compound of formula V: PNG media_image14.png 114 142 media_image14.png Greyscale (MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following; note: R in formula V can be L-R1 or L-Y+ such as those in claims 2 and 3). Regarding claim 23, Wolfe discloses wherein R is PNG media_image15.png 62 370 media_image15.png Greyscale (MES, MOPS; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 24, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is selected from PNG media_image16.png 84 496 media_image16.png Greyscale (HEPES, TAPS, TES are known to exist in zwitteronic form; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 25, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is selected from PNG media_image17.png 186 464 media_image17.png Greyscale (TAPS, TAPSO are known to exist in zwitterionic form; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 26, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is selected from PNG media_image18.png 147 514 media_image18.png Greyscale (TAPS, TAPSO are known to exist in zwitterionic form; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 31, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is selected from PNG media_image19.png 314 610 media_image19.png Greyscale (MES is known to exist in zwitterionic form; see entire disclosure and especially P31 and the figures following). Regarding claim 59, Wolfe discloses a process for making a zinc battery, comprising contacting an aqueous electrolyte composition of claim 1 with a zinc-battery electrode (see entire disclosure and especially P13, 38, 47-48). Regarding claim 67, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is present in the aqueous electrolyte at a concentration equal to, or greater than, 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to less than, or equal to, 30 wt % (water is present in the ionic liquid electrolyte at 0.1-50 wt %; see entire disclosure and especially P33, 35; P32 lists a number of suitable cations that are with the compounds above to form the ionic liquid (protic or aprotic); the cation used for the calculation is selected as 1-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridinium; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and MES and 1-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridinium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, MES is present in approximately 27.5 wt. %). Regarding claim 68, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive is present in the aqueous electrolyte at a concentration equal to, or greater than, 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to less than, or equal to, 35 wt % (water is present in the ionic liquid electrolyte at 0.1-50 wt %; see entire disclosure and especially P33, 35; P32 lists a number of suitable cations that are with the compounds above to form the ionic liquid (protic or aprotic); the cation used for the calculation is selected as 1-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridinium; if water is assumed at 50 wt. % and MES and 1-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridinium are used together at a 1:1 ratio in 100g of the electrolyte, MES is present in approximately 27.5 wt. %). Regarding claim 70, Wolfe discloses wherein the electrolyte additive of formula II further comprises a quaternary ammonium cation (the battery is a zinc-air battery that would produce Zn2+ to coordinate with the sulfonate anion of MES, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, TAPS, TAPSO, TES). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuriyama et al (US 20140134477 A1). Regarding claims 1, 8, and 9, Kuriyama discloses an aqueous electrolyte composition comprising an electrolyte additive of Formula A, or a salt, zwitterion, cation, or anion thereof: PNG media_image2.png 112 122 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein: R is L-R1, L-Y+, C3-C8cycloalkyl, C3-C8heteroarylalkyl, or C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; L is a linear C1-C6alkylene, branched C1-C6alkylene, C3-C8cycloalkylene, or C3-C8heterocycloalkylene; wherein L is optionally substituted with one to four -OH; R1 is selected from -OH, C1-C4alkoxy, -C(O)OR2, -NR2C(O)R3, -NR4aR4b, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, -S(O)R5, C3-C8cycloalkyl, and C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; R2 and R3 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, C2-C6alkenyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; wherein R2 and R3 with the exception of hydrogen are independently optionally substituted with one to four R6; R4a and R4b are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen,C1-C6alkyl, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, -CR7R8R9, -CH2C(O)R10, cycloalkyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; or R4a and R4b are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6; R5 is -OH, C14alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl; R6, when present, is independently, in each instance, selected from C1-C6alkyl,-NH2, halogen, -OH, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, and -C(O)OR11; R7, R8, and R9 are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, -CH2C(O)R10, and hydroxyC1-C4alkyl; R10 is selected from -NH2, -OH, and C1-C4alkyl; R11 is selected from hydrogen and C1-C4alkyl; Y+ is selected from -N+R12R13R14, C3-C8heteroaryl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen, and C3-C8heterocycloalkyl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen; and R12, R13, and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, and -CR7R8R9;or R12 and R13 are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached to form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or 6-membered heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6 (as drawn to claim 1), wherein R1 is selected from -OH and -C(O)OR2 and R2 is selected from hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, n- propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, and tert-butyl (as drawn to claim 8), and wherein R1 is -OH (as drawn to claim 9) (“The nonaqueous electrolyte contains a nonaqueous solvent, an electrolyte, at least one hydroxyalkylsulfonic acid”, P30; “2-hydroxyethanesulfonic acid”, P33; see entire disclosure and especially P30, 33, 42); and wherein the electrolyte additive is present in the aqueous electrolyte at a concentration equal to, or greater than, 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to less than, or equal to, 40 wt % (“The concentration of the hydroxyalkylsulfonic acid in the nonaqueous electrolyte is, for example, from 0.01 to 10% by mass”, P34). Claims 1 and 27 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mizuno et al (US 20230110251 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 27, Mizuno discloses an aqueous electrolyte composition comprising an electrolyte additive of Formula A, or a salt, zwitterion, cation, or anion thereof: PNG media_image2.png 112 122 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein: R is L-R1, L-Y+, C3-C8cycloalkyl, C3-C8heteroarylalkyl, or C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; L is a linear C1-C6alkylene, branched C1-C6alkylene, C3-C8cycloalkylene, or C3-C8heterocycloalkylene; wherein L is optionally substituted with one to four -OH; R1 is selected from -OH, C1-C4alkoxy, -C(O)OR2, -NR2C(O)R3, -NR4aR4b, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, -S(O)R5, C3-C8cycloalkyl, and C3- C8heterocycloalkyl; R2 and R3 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, C2-C6alkenyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; wherein R2 and R3 with the exception of hydrogen are independently optionally substituted with one to four R6; R4a and R4b are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen,C1-C6alkyl, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, -CR7R8R9, -CH2C(O)R10, cycloalkyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and arylC1-C4alkyl; or R4a and R4b are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6; R5 is -OH, C14alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl; R6, when present, is independently, in each instance, selected from C1-C6alkyl,-NH2, halogen, -OH, hydroxyCl-C4alkyl, and -C(O)OR11; R7, R8, and R9 are independently, in each instance, selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, -CH2C(O)R10, and hydroxyC1-C4alkyl; R10 is selected from -NH2, -OH, and C1-C4alkyl; R11 is selected from hydrogen and C1-C4alkyl; Y+ is selected from -N+R12R13R14, C3-C8heteroaryl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen, and C3-C8heterocycloalkyl containing at least one quaternary nitrogen; and R12, R13, and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen, C1-C6alkyl, aryl, arylC1-C4alkyl, cycloalkyl, hydroxyC1-C4alkyl, and -CR7R8R9;or R12 and R13 are taken together with the nitrogen to which they are attached to form a 6-membered heterocycloalkyl or 6-membered heteroaryl optionally substituted with one to four R6 (as drawn to claim 1), wherein the electrolyte additive is selected from PNG media_image20.png 262 520 media_image20.png Greyscale (as drawn to claim 27) (“The phosphazene compound (A) contained in the non-aqueous electrolyte solution…contains at least one of…a phosphazene compounds represented by the following Formula (2)”, P53; “In Formula (2), each of Y− and Z− independently represents an anion in which a proton is removed from an inorganic acid or an active hydrogen compound”, P55; “The active hydrogen compound is not limited as long as it can yield an anion excluding a proton, and the active hydrogen compound may be…a compound having an active hydrogen atom bonded to an oxygen atom”, P57; “Examples of the compound having an active hydrogen atom bonded to an oxygen atom include…sulfonic acids having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms”, P60; “Examples of the sulfonic acids having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms include … 3-pyridinesulfonic acid”, P63; see entire disclosure and especially P63); and wherein the electrolyte additive is present in the aqueous electrolyte at a concentration equal to, or greater than, 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to less than, or equal to, 40 wt % (“wherein a content of the phosphazene compound (A) is from 0.1% by mass to 2.0% by mass with respect to a total amount of the non-aqueous electrolyte solution for a battery”, P18). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Mary Harris whose telephone number is (571)272-0690. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am-5 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at (571)272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARY GRACE HARRIS/Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12567615
LIQUID COOLING DEVICE AND BATTERY PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562439
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555820
INORGANIC SOLID ELECTROLYTE-CONTAINING COMPOSITION, SHEET FOR ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS FOR SHEET FOR ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12500248
SEPARATOR FOR FUEL CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12494501
STACK CASE AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING STACK CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month