Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/159,603

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING EMERGENCY SERVICE AND PRIORITY SERVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 25, 2023
Examiner
DEAN, JR, JOSEPH E
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
653 granted / 750 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 750 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/31/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Won (US20210250890)/also see provisional application No. 62/ 972, 912 . Per claim 1, Won discloses a method of an access and mobility management function (AMF) entity in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: receiving, from a unified data management (UDM) entity, an update notification message (paragraph 0597-0599, i.e. In case j, e.g., upon reception of UE parameters update data [see, e.g., 3GPP TS 23.502] from the UDM to be forwarded to the UE, the AMF can or shall: a) set the Payload container type IE to “UE parameters update transparent container”; and b) set the contents of the Payload container IE to the UE parameters update data [see, e.g., 3GPP TS 23.502] received from the UDM). including first information for updating a user equipment (UE) with a multimedia priority service (MPS) priority corresponding to an access identity 1 (paragraph 0351, i.e. the network informs the UE that the use of access identity 1 is valid in the RPLMN or equivalent PLMN by setting the MPS indicator bit of the 5GS network feature support IE to “Access identity 1 valid”, in the REGISTRATION ACCEPT message. Based on operator policy, the AMF sets the MPS indicator bit in the REGISTRATION ACCEPT message based on the MPS priority information in the user's subscription context obtained from the UDM) ;transmitting, to the UE , a configuration update command message including second information validating the access identity 1 for the MPS priority based on the first information; and receiving, from the UE, a registration request message based on the second information (paragraph 0353, i.e. during ongoing active PDU sessions that were set up relying on the MPS indicator bit being set to “Access identity 1 valid”, if the network indicates in a registration update that the MPS indicator bit is reset to “Access identity 1 not valid”, then the UE can or shall no longer act as a UE with access identity 1 configured for MPS unless the USIM contains a valid configuration for access identity 1 in RPLMN or equivalent PLMN and paragraph 0354, i.e. d) the network informs the UE that the use of access identity 2 is valid in the RPLMN or equivalent PLMN by setting the MCS indicator bit of the 5GS network feature support IE to “Access identity 2 valid”, in the REGISTRATION ACCEPT message. Based on operator policy, the AMF sets the MCS indicator bit in the REGISTRATION ACCEPT message based on the MCS priority information in the user's subscription context obtained from the UDM. Per claim 2, Won discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the update notification message is received from the UDM entity without a transmission of a request message to the UDM entity, see paragraph 0597-0599, i.e. In case j, e.g., upon reception of UE parameters update data [see, e.g., 3GPP TS 23.502] from the UDM to be forwarded to the UE, the AMF can or shall: a) set the Payload container type IE to “UE parameters update transparent container”; and b) set the contents of the Payload container IE to the UE parameters update data [see, e.g., 3GPP TS 23.502] received from the UDM). Per claim 3, Won discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the UE determines whether an access identity 1 is valid based on the second information(paragraph 0355,i.e. The MCS indicator bit in the 5GS network feature support IE provided in the REGISTRATION ACCEPT message is valid until the UE receives a REGISTRATION ACCEPT message with the MCS indicator bit set to “Access identity 2 not valid” or until the UE selects a non-equivalent PLMN. Access identity 2 is only applicable while the UE is in N1 mode). Per claim 4, Won discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the registration request message includes a parameter of establishment cause indicating a priority service (paragraph 0399-0401, i.e. the UE is configured for high priority access in selected PLMN; the REGISTRATION REQUEST message is as a paging response; or the UE is establishing an emergency PDU session or performing emergency services fallback). Per claim 5, Won discloses the method of claim 4, further comprising: transmitting, to the UE, a registration accept message (paragraph 0248 without authentication in at least one of a network slice admission control (NSAC) procedure or a network slice-specific authentication and authorization (NSSAA) procedure. Per claim 6, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 1 (except from the UE perspective instead of an AMF, see response to Applicant's argument section). Per claim 7, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 3. Per claim 8, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 4. Per claim 9, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 5. Per claim 10, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 1, see paragraph 0132, for controller, and paragraph 0134, for transmitter and receiver. Per claim11, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 2. Per claim 12, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 3. Per claim 13, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 4. Per claim 14, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 5. Per claim 15, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 1, see paragraph 0132, for controller, and paragraph 0134, for transmitter and receiver. Per claim 16, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 3. Per claim 17, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 4. Per claim 18, refer to the same rationale as explained in claim 5. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH E DEAN, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-7116. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH E DEAN, JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 25, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604357
USER EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587597
Alert Ringtone for Urgent Messages
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588081
CARRIER SPECIFIC APERIODIC GAP FOR CAPABILITY SHARING FOR MUSIM OPERATION FOR DUAL TX/RX DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579547
Identification Of Malicious Activity Based On Analysis Of Travel Path Of A Mobile Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572180
DISPLAY PANEL SUPPORT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 750 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month