Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/161,328

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTOSENSITIVE MEMBER, ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTOSENSITIVE MEMBER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 30, 2023
Examiner
SULLIVAN IV, CHARLES COLLINS
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
57 granted / 86 resolved
+1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 86 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed 12/16/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-3, and 5-23 remain pending. Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11, and 13-23 are amended. Claim 4 has been cancelled. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/16/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues Ogaki formula (1-5) does not cover Formula (1) of the amended Instant Claims. Specifically, Applicant notes Rf1 and Rf2 both representing perfluoroalkyl group having 3 carbons each, noting many of the specific examples of formula (1-5) have more than 6 carbon atoms between the perfluoroalkyl groups. While Examiner agrees the specific examples are not an exact match to the formula (1) of the amended claim, it would be an obvious variant to one of skill in the art. Examples of the perfluoroalkyl groups in formula (1-5) teach examples with 1-6 carbon atoms in the location equivalent to Rf2 in the instant claim 1, (Ogaki page 13). Applicant further argues Ogaki formula (Rf12-9) has R20 (corresponding to R12) as a single bond, and the equivalent Rf1 having 2 carbon atoms and Rf2 of 4 carbon atoms. Examiner notes (Rf12-9) does not specifically detail the value of R20, it only provides an example of the combination of Rf1-O-Rf2 of the Instant Claim. Examiner agrees (Rf12-9) no longer anticipates the amended claim. However, in view of (Rf12-1) through (Rf12-17) a perfluoroalkyl group interrupted by an oxygen atom with 3 carbon atoms on each side of the oxygen would be obvious variation to one of skill in the art, requiring only routine experimentation. Applicant further argues Ogaki notes formula (1-5) is responsible for the high affinity with fluorine atom-containing resin particles, and one of skill in the art would recognize a longer perfluoroalkyl chain after oxygen, closer to the tip of the Rf12 group would provide greater interaction with the fluorine containing resin particles. Examiner notes that while Ogaki does mention formula (1-5) is noted for its affinity to fluorine atom containing resin particles, Ogaki specifically mentions the importance of the oxygen interrupting the perfluoroalkyl group. (Ogaki [0077]). Furthermore, Ogaki includes examples with the perfluoroalkyl group interrupted by multiple oxygen atoms, and example Rf12 groups with as little as 1 carbon atom after the oxygen atom, (Rf12-1) and (Rf12-12). The length of the part of the perfluoroalkyl group after the oxygen, equivalent to Rf2 in the Instant Claims, is not limited by Ogaki. Ogaki does not teach away from a perfluoroalkyl group with a section equivalent to Rf2 in the Instant Claims with 3 carbon atoms, the preferred formula (1-5-13), page 15 possesses only 3 carbon atoms after the final oxygen atom. Claim Objections Applicant is advised that should claim 2 be found allowable, claim 3 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Following the amendments, claim 2 and claim 3 have substantially identical limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-7, 10-11, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogaki (US 20080199795). Regarding claim 1, Ogaki discloses an electrophotographic photoreceptor comprising a surface layer which includes a polymers having a specific repeating unit, as well as fluorine atom containing resin particles (abstract, [0014]). Ogaki further discloses the surface layer includes a binder resin, and the polymer having the specific repeating unit has a portion having a high affinity for the resin particles and a portion having an affinity for the binder resin ([0099]). Ogaki further teaches the polymer contains repeating structural units represented by at least one of (1-1) to (1-6), with (1-5) taught to be a similar repeating unit to Applicant’s formula (1) in the pending claims 1 and 3 ([0015]-[0016], [0025] [0036], [0068]-[0072]). PNG media_image1.png 126 386 media_image1.png Greyscale Ogaki further discloses R1 is a hydrogen atom or a methyl group, and R20 is a single bond or an alkylene group ([0016]). Ogaki further discloses Rf12 is a fluoroalkyl group interrupted with oxygen, which reads on the Rf1—O—Rf2 of the Instant Claims 1 and 3 ([0016]). Ogaki further discloses several specific examples of Rf12 which may be used in formula (1-5) which covers a range of carbon atoms before and after the oxygen atom (page 13). While no specific example are specifically 3 carbon perfluoroalkyl, oxygen, and 3 perfluoroalkyl as claimed, one of skill in the art would recognize the definition of Rf12 would cover such a group, and it could be produced with routine experimentation ([0071]-[0072], page 13). Ogaki further discloses by using the repeating structure represented by (1-5) with a fluoroalkyl group interrupted with an oxygen atom improves dispersibility of the fluorine atom containing resin particles in the surface layer ([0077]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to test possible Rf12 fluoroalkyl groups to determine which best disperses the fluorine containing resin particles. Regarding claims 2 and 3, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the polymer is further produced using formula (a), comprising linking group Y and terminal group Z. Linking group Y is preferably formula (c), and terminal group Z is preferably a (meth)acrylic group represented by formula (b-1) or (b-2) ([0091]-[0100]). PNG media_image2.png 101 291 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 53 276 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 122 276 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 84 268 media_image5.png Greyscale The structural units making up the polymer do not contain acidic groups known to have a pKa value of 3 or less. Regarding claim 5, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the weight average molecular weight of the polymer is preferably 1,000 to 100,000 ([0102]). Regarding claim 6-7, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the content of the fluorine atom containing resin particles is 0.1-30 mass% with respect to the protective layer and the content of the polymer having the specific repeating structural unit is 0.05-5 mass% of the charge transporting substance and the binder resin ([0229]). Therefore, the content of the polymer can range from 0.05/30 to 5/0.1, or 0.0017 to 50 mass% with respect to the fluorine atom containing resin particles. Regarding claim 10, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the fluorine atom containing resin particles are preferably tetrafluoroethylene resin particles ([0175]) Regarding claim 11, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the average particle size of the tetrafluoroethylene resin particles is 0.15µm (aka 150nm) ([0276]). Ogaki further discloses other Examples, comprising average particles sizes of 0.14-0.17 µm ([0304], [0305]). Regarding claims 18-20, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses polycarbonate or polyarylate is used as the binder of the surface layer ([0214]-[0217]). Ogaki further discloses use of charge transport substance (CTM-2), which reads on applicant’s formula (3) of pending claim 19. PNG media_image6.png 134 288 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claims 21 and 22, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses a process cartridge and electrophotographic apparatus each having the electrophotographic photosensitive member ([0003], [0013], [0018]-[0020]). Ogaki further discloses the process cartridge is integrally supported and detachably attached to the main body of an electrophotographic apparatus ([0018]). Regarding claim 23 Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses a method of manufacturing the electrophotographic member ([0003], [0013]). Ogaki further teaches the method comprises forming the surface layer using a coating solution containing the polymer having repeating structural units represented by formula (1) ([0017]). Ogaki further discloses the charge transporting layer coating solution (aka surface-layer coating solution) is prepared by dispersion with the addition of the fluorine containing resin particles ([0217]-[0219]). Ogaki further discloses the solution is prepared, applied using dip coating, and dried to form the charge transporting layer ([0274]-[0278]). Claims 8-9 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogaki (US 20080199795) as applied to claims 1-7, 10-11, and 18-23 above, and further in view of Iwasaki (US 20200257212). Regarding claims 8-9, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki does disclose the polymer having the specific repeating unit also has a repeating unit meeting formula (a), with the terminal group Z represented by formula (b-1) or (b-2) ([0091]), which reads on Applicant’s formula (2). However, Ogaki does not disclose how many times (b-1) or (b-2) is repeated. Iwasaki teaches a similar photoreceptor comprising a surface layer that contains fluorine containing resin particles and a fluorine containing graft polymer (abstract). The fluorine containing graft polymer has a fluorinated segment (FA) and a non-fluorinated segment (FB) similar to that of Ogaki. The non-fluorinated segment (FB) reads on the Applicant’s formula (2) in pending claim 8, wherein YA1 is an alkylene group, YB is an ester group bounded on either side by an alkylene group and an ester group that corresponds to the applicants formula (2A) ([0133]-[0134]). PNG media_image7.png 278 210 media_image7.png Greyscale Iwasaki further teaches fn is an integer of 1 or more ([0134]). Iwasaki further teaches the fluorine containing graft polymer is used as a dispersant to enhance the dispersibility of the fluorine containing resin particles ([0009]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to ensure the photoreceptor of Ogaki uses a fluorine containing graft copolymer comprising a non-fluorinated segment comprising the formula (FB), as taught by Iwasaki, to improve dispersibility of the fluorine containing resin particles. Regarding claims 12-13, Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses Ogaki does not disclose the binder resin as a cured product of a hole transporting compound having a polymerizable functional group. Iwasaki teaches the charge transport layer contains a polymeric charge-transporting material ([0229]). Iwasaki further teaches the charge transport material is preferably a triarylamine derivative having the structure of formula (a-1), which reads on the claimed structure (CT-1) in pending claim 13 ([0231]-[0237]). PNG media_image8.png 56 180 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, modified Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the content of the fluorine atom containing resin particles is 0.1-30 mass% with respect to the protective layer and the content of the polymer having the specific repeating structural unit is 0.05-5 mass% of the charge transporting substance and the binder resin ([0229]). Claims 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogaki (US 20080199795) in view of Iwasaki (US 20200257212) as applied to claims 8-9 and 12-14 above, and further in view of Yamamoto (JP 2014038139). Regarding claims 15-16, modified Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki does not disclose a triazine based compound used in the binder resin. Yamamoto teaches a photoreceptor with a desired elastic deformation ration in the surface layer to prevent peeling of the photosensitive member ([0004]-[0012]). Yamamoto further teaches peeling is prevented by using a surface layer with a charge transport polymer that is formed by reacting a charge transporting compound having an alcohol or alkoxy group with guanamine or melamine compound ([0061]-[0063]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to ensure the photosensitive member of modified Ogaki produces the binder by reacting the charge transport material with a guanamine or melamine resin, as taught by Yamamoto, to prevent peeling of the surface layer. Regarding claim 17, modified Ogaki discloses all limitations as set forth above. Ogaki further discloses the content of the fluorine atom containing resin particles is 0.1-30 mass% with respect to the protective layer and the content of the polymer having the specific repeating structural unit is 0.05-5 mass% of the charge transporting substance and the binder resin ([0229]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES COLLINS SULLIVAN IV whose telephone number is (571)272-2208. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Huff can be reached at (571) 272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1737 /MARK F. HUFF/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1737
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 15, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 15, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 16, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578665
TONER PRODUCING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570847
METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE RESIN PARTICLE DISPERSION, METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRESSURE-RESPONSIVE RESIN, METHOD FOR PRODUCING TONER FOR ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPMENT, AND COMPOSITE RESIN PARTICLE DISPERSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12554209
TONER PARTICLE WITH AMORPHOUS POLYESTER RESIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12523944
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12504700
TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+21.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 86 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month