Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/162,962

SECONDARY TRANSFORM DESIGNS FOR PARTITIONED TRANSFORM UNITS IN VIDEO CODING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 01, 2023
Examiner
VAZQUEZ COLON, MARIA E
Art Unit
2482
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

72%
Career Allow Rate
409 granted / 565 resolved
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 pending
600
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pp.7-9, filed November 24, 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 4, 15, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly considered prior art. In regards to the amended formerly independent withdrawn claims, these amended claims contain newly added limitations and these newly added limitations have change the scope of the claims and would require further search and consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 15-16, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 2017/0094314) in view of Zhao et al. (US 2020/0084447, hereinafter “’447”). Regarding claim 1 Zhao discloses a method of coding video data, the method comprising: determining that transform unit (TU) partitioning is used for a first coding unit (CU) of the video data; based on the determination that TU partitioning is used for the first CU, refraining from applying a secondary transform to a TU of the first CU; and coding the TU of the first CU without applying the secondary transform (video encoder may skip signaling of the NSST index for a current TU if there is no non-zero coefficient transmitted for the current TU; skipping encoding of data indicative of the NSST index for the current TU if there is no non-zero coefficient encoded for the current TU – [0152]; this disclosure may refer to the index indicating the selected non-separable secondary transform as a non-separable secondary transform (NSST) index – [0150]). However, fails to explicitly disclose based solely on the determination that TU partitioning is used for the first CU, refraining from applying a secondary transform to a TU of the first CU. In his disclosure ‘447 teaches based solely on the determination that TU partitioning is used for the first CU, refraining from applying a secondary transform to a TU of the first CU (‘447 teaches that based solely on the determination that a specific partitioning is used for the first CU, refraining from applying a secondary transform to partition of the first CU – [0111-0113]; ‘447 also discloses a CU can be partitioned into transform units TUs – [0003]; the Examiner notes that under the broadest reasonable interpretation, ‘447 teaches refraining from applying a secondary transform to a TU partition of a CU based solely on the determination that the TU partition is used for the CU). It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the teachings of ‘447 into the teachings of Zhao because such incorporation minimizes the complexity of the process (paragraph 23). Regarding claim 2 Zhao discloses the method of claim 1, wherein coding comprises encoding and wherein refraining from applying the secondary transform comprises refraining from signaling the secondary transform (skipping encoding of data indicative of the NSST index for the current TU if there is no non-zero coefficient encoded for the current TU – [0152]; this disclosure may refer to the index indicating the selected non-separable secondary transform as a non-separable secondary transform (NSST) index – [0150]). Regarding claim 3 Zhao discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the TU of the first CU is not a same size as the first CU (Fig. 2 shows an example where a CU includes ten TUs, labeled with the letters a to j, and the corresponding block partitioning. Each node of the RQT may actually be a TU – [0099]). Claim 15 corresponds to the device performing the method of claim 1. Therefore, claim 15 is being rejected on the same basis as claim 1. Claim 16 corresponds to the device performing the method of claim 2. Therefore, claim 16 is being rejected on the same basis as claim 2. Claim 17 corresponds to the device performing the method of claim 3. Therefore, claim 17 is being rejected on the same basis as claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6, 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA E VAZQUEZ COLON whose telephone number is (571)270-1103. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM-3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTOPHER S KELLEY can be reached at (571)272-7331. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARIA E VAZQUEZ COLON/ Examiner, Art Unit 2482
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 21, 2025
Interview Requested
Jun 24, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12593061
DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, CODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593053
MOVING IMAGE DECODING/ENCODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574626
TRACKING CAMERA AND OPERATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574534
TRANSMISSION DEVICE FOR POINT CLOUD DATA AND METHOD PERFORMED BY TRANSMISSION DEVICE, AND RECEPTION DEVICE FOR POINT CLOUD DATA AND METHOD PERFORMED BY RECEPTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568313
VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+13.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner