Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/162,976

COMPOSITION COMPRISING A BENZOATE SALT OF 5-METHOXY-N,N-DIMETHYLTRYPTAMINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 01, 2023
Priority
Jun 12, 2020 — GB 2008964.5 +13 more
Examiner
COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY
Art Unit
1624
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Beckley Psytech Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
1208 granted / 1617 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1617 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Claims 81 and 101-109 are pending in the application. This action is in response to applicants' amendment dated March 12, 2026. Response to Amendment Applicant's arguments filed March 12, 2026 have been fully considered with the following effect: With regards to the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph rejection, labeled paragraph 7) in the last office action, the applicant’s amendments and remarks have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicants stated that “ansolvate” does not appear in ipsis verbis in the as-filed application. The applicants further stated that “ansolvate” is an art-reconized term that refers to a crystalline form that does not contain repeating solvent molecules (e.g., water) within its crystalline lattice, that is to say, an ansolvate is a crystalline form that is desolvated. However, the ansolvate form is also known of the anhydrous form which is the solvent-free state of a compound, typically obtained by removing all solvent molecules (e.g., water) from a hydrate or solvate. Desolvated solvate is the product formed when solvent molecules are removed from a solvate (hydrate or organic solvent inclusion compound). Further desolvation does not necessary remove all of the solvate and thus desolvation would not necessarily yield an ansolvate where there is no solvent in the product. Zhang states that a crystalline form may contain a single entity (the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) molecule) or multiple entities, including the API and other adducts, crystals containing only the API molecule are usually called anhydrate or ansolvate. The additional adduct to the API in the crystal could be a solvent, a neutral guest, or a counter-ion and the crystal form would be defined as a solvate, a cocrystal, or a salt, respectively. Zhang further states that a solvate is not a polymorph of an anhydrate, as they have different chemical compositions, while an amorphous form is not a polymorph neither as it is not crystalline. Claim 81 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention, for reasons of record and stated above. In view of the amendment dated March 12, 2026, the following new grounds of rejection apply: Election/Restrictions Claims 101-109 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected by original presentation in the final rejection mailed November 24, 2025, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election is being treated as a final election without traverse. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRENDA L COLEMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-0665. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6 (flex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey H. Murray can be reached at 571-272-9023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRENDA L COLEMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 26, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637463
TRICYCLIC KINASE INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637429
NOVEL OXIDIZED LAPPACONITINE DERIVATIVE AND USE THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636310
THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR SHORT TEAR BREAKUP TIME-TYPE DRY EYE AND EYE DROPS CONTAINING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630565
DNA-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR
4y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629359
STRUCTURAL ANALOGUES OF METHYLPHENIDATE AS PARKINSON'S DISEASE-MODIFYING AGENTS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1617 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month