Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/164,107

FILTER ARRANGEMENTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 03, 2023
Priority
Aug 03, 2020 — provisional 63/060,133 +1 more
Examiner
POPOVICS, ROBERT J
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Netafim Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 747 resolved
-10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 747 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election of 22 December 2025 Applicant’s election without traverse is acknowledged: PNG media_image1.png 730 926 media_image1.png Greyscale Claims 11-14, 23 and 24, being drawn to non-elected species, are withdrawn. Claims 1-10,15-22 and 25-28 will be examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10,15-22 and 25-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1. A filter arrangement comprising a cleaning mechanism for cleaning at least one screen filter of the filter arrangement, the cleaning mechanism comprising: a flush chamber; a central hollow core that extends through the flush chamber; and suction nozzles fitted to the core; wherein: the core extends between opposing axial ends that are located outside of the flush chamber; and the opposing axial ends are exposed to substantially similar pressures, at least during a cleaning operation of the cleaning mechanism. In claim 1, with respect to, “the core extends between opposing axial ends”, it is unclear to what “opposing axial ends” refers. The “opposing axial ends” of what? It is unclear how the conditional, process, recitation, “the opposing axial ends are exposed to substantially similar pressures, at least during a cleaning operation of the cleaning mechanism” limits the claim. It is unclear what structure this language intends. This language does not serve to precisely define the present structural attributes of interrelated component parts of the claimed filter arrangement that facilitate the claimed exposure. It is unclear what operational process conditions or metrics define a “cleaning operation”. It is unclear what range of pressures is intended by “substantially similar”. In claims 1-3,5-7,9-11,16-17,19-20,22,25 and 27, the recitation “the core” lacks clear positive antecedent basis. In claims 2-5,12,19-21 and 27, it is unclear if an additional “cleaning operation” is being referenced or specified, or how the “cleaning operation” differs, if at all, from the one previously introduced in the claim from which these dependent claims depend. In independent claim 25, it is unclear what is intended by “at least one helical rail configured to guide a cleaning operation”. It is unclear what operational process conditions or metrics define a “cleaning operation”, or how it is “controlled” by the “at least one helical rail”. While it is under stood how the rail could control movement of nozzles, it is not clear how it could control the operation. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “helical rail” (of claims 21-22) in combination with a “turbine”, must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Allowable Subject Matter Those claims only rejected under 35 USC 112 would be allowable if the 112 rejections were overcome. The prior art does not teach, “the core extends between opposing axial ends that are located outside of the flush chamber” and “the opposing axial ends are exposed to substantially similar pressures at least during a cleaning operation of the cleaning mechanism.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT JAMES POPOVICS whose telephone number is (571) 272-1164. The examiner can normally be reached from 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSEPH DEL SOLE can be reached at (571) 272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT J POPOVICS/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 12, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637183
Waterborne Waste-Disposal Vessel
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623170
Liquid Purification System
5y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12595197
CONTAINER, CARTRIDGE, KIT AND METHOD FOR SLOW RELEASE OF ALGAECIDE IN SWIMMING POOLS
4y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589841
WATER SURFACE FLOATER COLLECTING SHIP
2y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583762
SCREENING DEVICE FOR USE IN COARSE MATTER SCREENING WELLS OF A WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+23.0%)
3y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 747 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month