Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/164,485

Wear-Resistant Compositions Including Crosslinked Aromatic Polymers and Methods for Improving Wear Resistance Using the Same

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 03, 2023
Priority
Feb 03, 2022 — provisional 63/306,257
Examiner
MCDONOUGH, JAMES E
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Greene Tweed Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
1022 granted / 1432 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1432 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group III, claims 39-44, and polyarylenes as the species in the reply filed on 3/2/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no undue burden to search all claims. This is not found persuasive because the different groups related to different inventions, and there is nothing of record to show them as obvious variants, as such there would be an undue burden to search all claims from all groups. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 1-38 and 82-83, 85-86 and 88 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 3/2/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 39-44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Drake et al. (US 20140284850) Regarding claims 39-43 Drake discloses a method of controlling the cross-linking rate of a cross-linking compound for use in cross-linking an organic polymer (claim 26). Drake discloses that the polymer is an poly(arylene ether) (i.e., a polyarylene – aromatic polymer matrix material) (claim 34). It is noted that the instant specification discloses that the polymer may be a polyarylene (instant specification paragraph 0017), and is the specifically elected polymer. Drake discloses a method heat molding the cross-linked organic polymer to forma heat molded article (claim 63). With respect to the preamble limitation on being - for use in a high end PV end application in which it is subject to a frictional force or used in a tribological system - is an intended use. See Rowe v. Dror, 112 F.3d 473, 478, 42 USPQ2d 1550, 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1997) ("where a patentee defines a structurally complete invention in the claim body and uses the preamble only to state a purpose or intended use for the invention, the preamble is not a claim limitation"). With respect to the limitation of – when cross-linked, remains operable at a PV of at least about 75,000 psi-ft/min – it is noted that this is a property of the formed composition. When the reference discloses all the limitations of a claim except a property or function, and the examiner cannot determine whether or not the reference inherently possesses properties which anticipate or render obvious the claimed invention but has basis for shifting the burden of proof to applicant as in In re Fitzgerald, 619 F.2d 67, 205 USPQ 594 (CCPA 1980). See MPEP § § 2112- 2112.02. Regarding claim 44 Drake discloses that the organic polymer may include an additive such as carbon fibers, glass fibers, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or graphite (para 0028). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES E MCDONOUGH whose telephone number is (571)272-6398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-10. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 5712721177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES E. MCDONOUGH Examiner Art Unit 1734 /JAMES E MCDONOUGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637587
SELF-DISINFECTING COATING FOR SURFACES
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636700
CONDUCTIVE COMPOSITION FOR BONDING, BONDING STRUCTURE USING SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630716
FORMULATION COMPRISING CARNAUBA WAX AND AT LEAST ONE PARTICULAR SORBITAN MONOESTER
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624233
DNA based biodegradable resin composition
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622871
DNA-based electrochromic hydrogel and electrochromic device comprising same
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+11.1%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1432 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month