Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/165,569

ACTUATORS FOR MEDICAL DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 07, 2023
Priority
Feb 08, 2022 — provisional 63/307,757
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 832 resolved
-6.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
869
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 832 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The Amendment filed 3/6/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-9, 16, 21-30 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9, 21, 23 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “wherein the actuator is slidable between a plurality of different positions of the actuator along a circumference of the handle body, so that a central longitudinal axis of the actuator is moveable relative to the handle body” in Lines 10-12, wherein the actuator is formed of movable and fixed components, therefore it’s unclear how movement of the central longitudinal axis is being determined by movement of the actuator. It’s the examiner’s understanding that button is slidably movable with respect to the internal and external bodies to transition the central longitudinal axis of the button from a first position to a second position parallel to the first position. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16, 22, 24, 26-30 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-9, 21, 23 and 25 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 September 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740688
ENDOSCOPE AND TREATMENT TOOL ELEVATING MECHANISM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12708251
ENDOSCOPE ATTACHMENT MECHANISMS AND METHODS OF USE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12702283
MEDICAL INSERTION EQUIPMENT SYSTEM, CAPSULE, AND MEDICAL INSERTION EQUIPMENT DISINFECTION METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690753
VIDEO ENDOSCOPE WITH FLEXIBLE TIP
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678038
Pannable Endoscope
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+18.3%)
4y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 832 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month