Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/165,885

FOLDING WAND WITH FLUID CONDUIT PASSING THROUGH AXIS OF ROTATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 07, 2023
Examiner
PHAM, TUONGMINH NGUYEN
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gojo Industries Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
335 granted / 492 resolved
-1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
517
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 492 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Pending claims 1-20 are addressed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dobias (US 20130193232). Regarding claim 1, Dobias discloses an applicator for dispensing a fluid, comprising: a housing (50, 51; fig. 1); a pump (fig. 6: 72) disposed within the housing; and a wand (29) extending in a first direction between a first end (at 86) and a second end (90), the wand rotatably coupled to the housing between an open position (fig. 3) and a closed position (fig. 1), wherein: regardless of whether the wand is in the open position, the closed position, or between the open position and the closed position, a conduit (62) extends from the pump to the first end of the wand such that the fluid flows in the first direction enroute to being dispensed from the second end of the wand (as long as trigger 39 is pressed to open the pinch valve, flow is allowed through the conduit 62 regardless of wand position; par. 57), the wand defines an aperture (opening at 86 where 62 extends through) through which the conduit enters the first end of the wand such that the conduit extends in a second direction non-parallel to the first direction to enter the first end (see annotation below), the wand (29) defines a duct (tubular space inside the wand 29) extending between the first end of the wand and the second end of the wand (see fig. 3), and the conduit (62) extends inside the duct of the wand between the first end of the wand and the second end of the wand (see fig. 3, extension of 62 is shown in dashed line inside wand 29), and the conduit remains in the aperture when the wand is in the open position, the closed position, and between the open position and the closed position (see figs. 1, 6 and 23). PNG media_image1.png 620 500 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Dobias discloses the applicator of claim 1, wherein: the wand comprises a curved surface which defines the aperture (curve surface at 86 and 96, see fig. 1), and the curved surface cooperates with at least one of a housing curved surface or a housing curved edge (edge adjacent 86 and/or protruding members 94) to move between the open position and the closed position (see figs. 1, 10, 23). Regarding claim 6, Dobias discloses the applicator of claim 1, comprising: a nozzle (90) attached to the second end of the wand, wherein the conduit extends between the pump and the nozzle to deliver the fluid from the pump to the nozzle at the second end of the wand (see figs. 3 and 6). Regarding claim 7, Dobias discloses the applicator of claim 1, wherein the wand is rotatable through an angle of about 180 relative to the housing (see figs. 1 and 3). Regarding claim 10, Dobias discloses the applicator of claim 1, wherein the first direction is perpendicular to the second direction (see fig. 23). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 8, 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The most relevant prior arts include Bochmann (US 3901449), Lovitt (US 5097540) and Dobias (US 20130193232). The combination of the prior arts teaches various features of the claimed invention, as presented above but fail to teach or suggest, other limitations of claims 3-5, 8, 9 beyond teachings addressed for rejected claims shown above. Claims 11-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The most relevant prior arts include Bochmann (US 3901449), Lovitt (US 5097540) and Dobias (US 20130193232). The combination of the prior arts teaches various features of the claimed invention, as presented above but fail to teach or suggest, other limitations of claims 11 and 16 beyond teachings addressed for rejected claims shown above. Claims 12-15 and 17-20, depending from claim 11 and claim 16, are therefore also allowed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUONGMINH NGUYEN PHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-0158. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM - 5PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at 571-270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUONGMINH N PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599795
VALVE STATION FOR A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594446
COMPRESSED AIR FOAM SYSTEM WITH VORTEX MANIFOLD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589404
Temporary Protective Device for Fire Protection Sprinklers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582047
APPARATUS FOR AERIAL TOOL CONFIGURATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576419
Protective Cover and Installation Tool for Fire Protection Sprinklers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 492 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month