Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/166,275

SPECTROSCOPIC SIGNAL DETECTION DURING A LASER PROCEDURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 08, 2023
Priority
Feb 25, 2022 — provisional 63/268,525 +1 more
Examiner
LUAN, SCOTT
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gyrus ACMI, Inc. D.B.A. Olympus Surgical Technologies America
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
422 granted / 649 resolved
-5.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 649 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Response to Arguments In view of the Appeal Brief filed on 3/9/2026, PROSECUTION IS HEREBY REOPENED. Applicant’s argument has been fully considered but it is moot in light of a new ground of rejection. See discussion below. To avoid abandonment of the application, appellant must exercise one of the following two options: (1) file a reply under 37 CFR 1.111 (if this Office action is non-final) or a reply under 37 CFR 1.113 (if this Office action is final); or, (2) initiate a new appeal by filing a notice of appeal under 37 CFR 41.31 followed by an appeal brief under 37 CFR 41.37. The previously paid notice of appeal fee and appeal brief fee can be applied to the new appeal. If, however, the appeal fees set forth in 37 CFR 41.20 have been increased since they were previously paid, then appellant must pay the difference between the increased fees and the amount previously paid. A Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE) has approved of reopening prosecution by signing below: /NIKETA PATEL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3792 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brinkmann et al. (WO 2016201092 A1, 2016-12-15) (hereinafter “Brinkmann”) in view of Goldring et al. (US 20220011162 A1, 2022-01-13) (hereinafter “Goldring”). Regarding claims 1-12, Brinkmann teaches a system for spectroscopic signal detection, the system comprising: a spectrometer (e.g., 404); a light source emitter (e.g., 501) configurable to emit a first signal toward a target; an aiming light source emitter (e.g., 401) configurable to emit a second signal having a visible spectrum toward the target; and a first optical component (e.g., 408) for attenuating or removing noise associated with the second signal from a third signal, in response to the first signal, from the target back to the spectrometer (as recited in claim 1); wherein the spectrometer is coupled to a surgical fiber (e.g., 403), and wherein the first optical component includes at least one of a filter or a polarizer located in a first signal pathway between the surgical fiber and the spectrometer (e.g., [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], Fig. 5) (as recited in claim 2); wherein the first optical component includes at least one of a filter or a polarizer located in a second signal pathway between the aiming light source emitter and at least one of the surgical fiber or the spectrometer (e.g., [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182] and Figs. 4, 5) (as recited in claim 3); further comprising: a third optical component (e.g., 406) for attenuating or removing noise associated with at least one of the second signal or the third signal, wherein the second optical component is located in at least one of a first signal pathway between the surgical fiber and the spectrometer or a second signal pathway between the aiming light source emitter and at least one of the surgical fiber or the spectrometer (e.g., [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 4); wherein the second optical component includes a filter or a polarizer (as recited in claim 5); wherein the first optical component includes at least one of filter or a polarizer located in an optical path between the target and the spectrometer (as recited in claim 6); wherein the aiming light source emitter includes a laser diode (e.g., [0153], [0169]) (as recited in claim 7); wherein the light source emitter includes a Light Emitting Diode (LED) (e.g., [0105], [0169]) (as recited in claim 8); wherein a rejection frequency of the first optical component is based on a wavelength of light emitted from the aiming light source emitter (as recited in claim 9); wherein the system is configured to be coupled to an in-vivo-insertable therapeutic or diagnostic endoscopic system (e.g., [0171]-[0173]) (as recited in claim 10); further comprising: a controller, coupled to the aiming light source emitter, configurable to pulse the aiming light source emitter on and off, wherein the spectrometer is configured to collect or analyze at least one of the first signal or the third signal when the aiming light source is pulsed off (e.g., [0116], [0153], [0175]) (as recited in claim 11); wherein the spectrometer is configured to pulse the aiming light source emitter for allowing a change in a wavelength of light emitted from the aiming light source emitter to a different wavelength (e.g., [0012]-[0015]) (as recited in claim 12). See, e.g., [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], Figs. 4-6 and associated text. Brinkmann does not expressly teach a second optical component located at an output of the aiming light source emitter to prefilter the second signal as it is emitted from the aiming light source emitter to remove at least one source of noise from the second signal before it reaches the target. Goldring teaches filtering of aiming light and the motivation of improving signal-to-noise ratio. See, e.g., [0015], [0100]-[0105]; [0100] (“The visible aiming beam 20 and the optical beam 30 may be partially or completely overlapping, aligned, and/or coaxial.”); [0105] (“In some configurations, the spectrometer module 160 may comprise a plurality of optical filters configured to inhibit transmission of a portion of the aiming beam 20 reflected the sample material S . . .”); [0220]-[0221] (disclosing improving signal-to-noise ratio by inhibiting stray light); [0229]-[0232] (disclosing avoiding sources of noise in the measurement beam). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Goldring with the invention taught by Brinkmann such that the invention further comprises a second optical component located at an output of the aiming light source emitter to prefilter the second signal as it is emitted from the aiming light source emitter to remove at least one source of noise from the second signal before it reaches the target (as recited in claim 1) in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement beam. Regarding claims 13-20, as discussed above, Brinkmann teaches a system for spectroscopic signal detection, the system comprising: a spectrometer; a light source emitter configurable to emit a first signal toward a target; an aiming light source emitter configurable to emit a second signal having a visible spectrum toward the target; an optical component located at an output of the aiming light source emitter to pre-filter the second signal as it is emitted from the aiming light source emitter to remove at least one source of noise from the second signal before it reaches the target; and a controller, coupled to the aiming light source emitter, configurable to pulse the aiming light source emitter on and off, wherein the spectrometer is configured to collect or analyze at least one of the first signal or a third signal, in response to the first signal, from the target when the aiming light source emitter is pulsed off (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 13); wherein the spectrometer is configured to collect or analyze at least one of the first signal or the third signal when the aiming light source emitter is pulsed on (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 14); wherein the spectrometer is configured to pulse the aiming light source emitter for allowing a change in a wavelength of light emitted from the aiming light source emitter to a different wavelength (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 15); a method for spectroscopic signal detection during an in-vivo-insertable medical procedure, the method comprising: emitting a first signal from a light source toward a target; emitting a second signal from an aiming beam emission source toward the target; pre-filtering the second signal emitted from the aiming beam emission source using an optical component located at an output of the aiming beam emission source as the second signal is emitted from aiming beam emission source to remove at least one source of noise from the second signal before it reaches the target; receiving, in response to the first signal, a third signal from the target at a spectrometer; pulsing the aiming beam emission source off for a period of time; collecting the third signal received during the period of time; and analyzing the collected third signal using the spectrometer (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 16); further comprising: attenuating or removing a portion of the third signal received from the target (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 17); wherein the portion of the third signal is attenuated or removed using at least one additional optical component in at least one of a first signal pathway between a surgical fiber and the spectrometer or a second signal pathway between the aiming beam emission source and at least one of the surgical fiber or the spectrometer (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 18); a method for spectroscopic signal detection during an in-vivo-insertable medical procedure, the method comprising: emitting a first signal from a light source toward a target; emitting a second signal from an aiming beam emission source toward the target; pre-filtering the second signal emitted from the aiming beam emission source using an optical component located at an output of the aiming beam emission source as the second signal is emitted from aiming beam emission source to remove at least one source of noise from the second signal before it reaches the target; receiving, in response to the first signal, a third signal from the target at a spectrometer; attenuating or removing noise associated with the second signal from a third signal; and analyzing the collected third signal to determine a characteristic of the target (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 19); wherein the attenuated or removed noise has substantially the same wavelength as the second signal before pre-filtering (e.g., [ [0136], [0147], [0181]-[0182], [0105], [0153], [0169], [0171]-[0173], Figs. 4-6 and associated text) (as recited in claim 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT T LUAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1860. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm, M-F (generally). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Jackson, can be reached on 571-272-4697. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Scott Luan /SCOTT LUAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Sep 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 26, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 08, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Mar 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702359
MEDICAL PATCH
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703115
DETACHABLE MANIPULATOR AND SURGICAL ROBOT COMPRISING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697181
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING MOTION OF KINEMATIC CHAINS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697252
Probes Having Fiber Taper and Fluid Collection Channel for Ophthalmic Laser Treatment
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697074
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING A FOOD COMPATIBILITY DATUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+12.4%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month