Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/166,536

IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT SETS INFORMATION RELATED TO TRANSFER DESTINATION, METHOD OF CONTROLLING IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 09, 2023
Priority
Feb 21, 2022 — JP 2022-024736
Examiner
OYEBISI, OJO O
Art Unit
3695
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
363 granted / 722 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§103
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In view of the amendment filed on 06/19/26, the examiner has withdrawn the previous 101 rejection and the prior art rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-6, 9-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The independent claims are amended to recite “wherein, in a case where the scanner scans a second original different from the first original and where a third character string located at a position corresponding to the first position information in second image data generated by scanning the second original coincides with the first character string, the communicator transmits a transfer instruction for causing the server to transfer a transfer amount indicated by a fourth character string located at a position corresponding to the second position information in the second image data to a transfer destination indicated by the third character string.” The examiner searched the specification but failed to find support for the newly recited limitations, above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OJO O OYEBISI whose telephone number is (571)272-8298. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, 9am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Behncke can be reached at 571-272-8103. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OJO O OYEBISI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 08, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 19, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12725162
TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING CARD TESTING ATTACKS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12646108
IMAGE-BASED FINANCIAL PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12614230
SWAP CROSSING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12580910
SYNTHETIC GENOMIC VARIANT-BASED SECURE TRANSACTION DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 9m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567056
SECURING TRANSACTIONS
6y 8m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+11.8%)
4y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month