Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/167,447

SOYBEAN VARIETY 5PGPZ13

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Feb 10, 2023
Examiner
STEPHENS, REBECCA JOHANNA
Art Unit
1663
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
131 granted / 198 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
235
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 198 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims The claims filed 16January2026 are acknowledged and have been fully considered. Claim 17 is cancelled. Claim 21 is new. Claims 1-16, 18-21 are pending and examined on the merits herein. Claims 1, 4-5, 7, 12, 16, 18, 20 are currently amended and claims 2-3, 6, 8-11, 13-15, 19 are original. Priority There is no priority claim of record. Claims 1-16, 18-21 maintain, and claim 21 has, an effective filing date that is the same as the actual filing date of this non-provisional application: 10February2023. Withdrawn Objections and/or Rejections Objections and/or rejections made of record in the nonfinal office action dated 16October2025 that are not otherwise discussed herein are withdrawn. In particular: RE ¶ 4: The objection to the specification is withdrawn in view of the amendments thereto; RE ¶¶ 6-10: The objections to the claims are withdrawn in view of the amendments to the claims; RE ¶¶ 11, 13-14: The indefiniteness rejections are withdrawn in view of the amendments to the claims; RE ¶ 15: The Written Description rejection of claim 17 is withdrawn in view of the claim amendments (claim 17 is now cancelled); RE ¶ 16: The Written Description rejection of claims 18-20 is withdrawn in view of the claim amendments; and RE ¶ 17: The provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection over Appl. No. 18167364 (now US Pat. No. 12465008) is withdrawn in view of the Terminal Disclaimer filed 16January2026 (approved 30January2026). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 - Indefiniteness The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 16 and 20 REMAIN rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. These claims recite a “commodity plant product”, but that term has neither a well-recognized meaning within the prior art nor a limiting definition in the specification. The one time it is recited in the specification is at ¶184 on page 55. Without more information from Applicant, it is not clear what is within, or outside of, the term “commodity plant product” (does a seed qualify? Does any plant part qualify?). This issue is compounded by the fact that claims 18 and 20 say that the “commodity plant product” comprises a cell while the one mention of “commodity plant product” in the specification (¶184 on page 55) suggests that a “commodity plant product” is a protein concentrate, protein isolate, soybean hulls, meal, flour, or oil—products that do not contain cells. Response to Applicant’s Remarks: Applicant traverses this rejection and asserts that, in any event, the amendments to the claims render it moot. This is not persuasive. Please amend claims 16 and 20 to provide a clear, limited definition of “commodity plant product” such as adding to the claims that the “commodity plant product comprises protein concentrate, protein isolate, soybean hulls, meal, flour, or oil” (specification at ¶184 on page 55). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rebecca STEPHENS whose telephone number is (571)272-0070. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amjad ABRAHAM can be reached at (571) 270-7058. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REBECCA STEPHENS/Examiner, Art Unit 1663 /MATTHEW R KEOGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599070
GENETIC LOCI ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASE RESISTANCE IN SOYBEANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599089
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 23010103
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595487
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF C4 PLANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590315
Compositions and Methods Based on QPT Engineering for Producing Tobacco Plants and Products Having Altered Alkaloid Levels
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588645
TOMATO VARIETY NUN 09400 TOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+31.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month